The Summary CNN Doesn’t Want You to See

The HDOH has indirectly confirmed that Obama’s Factcheck COLB is a forgery because

1) they have made a statutory admission that his BC is amended, which is required to be shown on a legitimate COLB but is not shown on the Factcheck COLB, and

2) They have said that Oahu BC’s have always been given the BC number by the HDOH on the “date filed”. The Factcheck COLB has a “date filed” 3 days earlier than the Nordyke twins’ but was given a number later than theirs. This statement by Okubo rules out past explanations (hospitals numbering the BC’s or being given blocks of numbers, or BC’s sitting in piles at the HDOH for days before being numbered). This means that either the “date filed”, certificate number, or both have been altered on the Factcheck COLB.

Because Obama’s genuine BC is amended, Hawaii law (HRS 338-17) says that it has no legal value unless it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and they rule the BC to be probative. Obama has fought lawsuits to make sure that his BC could never be presented as evidence, even though it is the only way he can have any birth facts legally determined.

The 20th Amendment of the Constitution says that if a President elect “fails to qualify” by Jan 20th, the Vice President elect is to “act as President” until a President qualifies.

Because the required procedure to legally determine Obama’s birth facts has never happened we know that Obama could not have “qualified” by January 20th, and anybody who certified his eligibility documentably perjured him/herself since even his age has never been legally determined and could disqualify him from eligibility for the Office of President.

The President elect becomes President automatically at noon on Jan 20th, but there are 2 Constitutional requirements that must be met before a sitting President can “act as President” or exercise the Presidential powers: he must take the oath of office and he must “qualify”. Doing one of the 2 is not enough and in no way impacts the need to meet the other requirement.

Obama has “failed to qualify” and the only person the 20th Amendment allows to “act as President” is Joe Biden, until a President qualifies. All this is known simply because his birth certificate has been amended and he has never presented it as evidence so it could possibly gain legal evidentiary value.

These claims are documented here. For the wider angle view on why this matters, and my motivation in addressing these issues, see

here

Advertisements

30 Comments

  1. Mrs. P
    Posted August 10, 2010 at 1:31 am | Permalink | Reply

    Thanks for sending me this update via e-mail. I have e-mailed it to all of my conservative friends. This needs to go viral!! We need to get the illegal resident out of the White House……along with all of his little libtard followers who are helping to cover this up ASAP!!

    • Posted August 10, 2010 at 1:43 pm | Permalink | Reply

      You’re welcome. And thank you for passing it around. These are facts which the public needs to know – which Congress needs to know.

      This is the actual post that I tried to post in a response to a CNN article on different ways Americans have thought their President was a crook down through history. I tried every combination I could think of to make it post, including getting rid of the link. They simply would not let me post it. I think the word “forgery” might have tripped their censor feature.

      Pretty bad when the news media have written “forgery” out of the conversation, even though the HDOH has actually confirmed that Factcheck is a forgery. I have notified all the news media companies I could think of to let them know the HDOH has confirmed this, but every one refuses to report it.

      I’m working on a post which will actually show that their refusal to correct the statements they have made about the Factcheck COLB and about what the HDOH has actually said, which they now know to be untrue, is a violation of the Federal General False Statement Act, which makes it a federal crime to DECEIVE the federal government in matters within their jurisdiction (for instance, Congress which decides whether to legally contest Obama’s ability to nominate SCOTUS justices, etc). Deceiving includes what you say and what you know but refuse to say – and that is gonna hit these media companies in the gut if we’ve got any law enforcement left in this country.

      May have to wait until we get a Republican Congress, but this stuff is adding up, and they should know in advance that their deception is a crime and the public will one day know it.

      Keep passing the word around. People are beginning to realize just how badly we are surrounded by crooks in high places.

  2. Larry
    Posted August 10, 2010 at 6:21 am | Permalink | Reply

    Short and Sweet.

    Thanks, BDZ. Always good to have your thoughts and efforts.

    • Posted August 10, 2010 at 1:45 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Thank you. I wanted a summary that people could understand without digging into all the nitty-gritty. Hopefully this can go viral and people can know the actual facts. I appreciate what everybody is doing to get the word out in spite of a media more interested in ridiculing than in actually addressing facts.

  3. cynkading
    Posted August 12, 2010 at 3:02 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Good morning,
    I will be happy to spread this far and wide. 🙂

    • Posted August 12, 2010 at 3:23 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Thank you. At this point you guys’ word of mouth is all we have, to educate the public. But a powerful force it is! =)

  4. thinkwell
    Posted August 14, 2010 at 2:57 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Hi BdZ,

    I have followed with interest your theory that an unholy evil alliance of Soros and Islam are using threat of contrived financial meltdown to coerce the otherwise loyal members of SCOTUS and many in Congress into their seemingly perplexing silent and passive acceptance of Obama and his enablers. Your interpretation of that being the reason for Bush’s uncharacteristic pre-election, bail-out panic is completely believable. It passes the smell test, IMO.

    The more I think about it, the more I come to believe that our salvation (if any) will be coming through citizen grass root actions at the State rather than the federal level. Thank goodness for Jan Brewer and other like-minded brave souls. Personally, in order to live free, I’d rather live in post melt-down poverty (or not live at all) rather than than submit to the tyranny of a capricious all-powerful regime and/or the shackles of shariah law.

    I am not suggesting giving up efforts through the federal court system to expose the naked fraud of the most destructive and anti-American President ever. I just think that it is important to recognize that the “fix may be in” too firmly at the federal level at this point (although there is always the chance that certain individuals in positions of power will wake up and being willing to risk career and perhaps their very lives in order to defend our wonderful American experiment). By all means continue the probative attacks on all fronts because who knows where the defenses of evil will crumble, but apply the most effort where it is most likely to do the most good.

    At the same time it is important to keep up the pro American, pro Freedom “buzz” because people need to know that they are not alone and that their individual actions are not yet meaningless. There is still time to win back America.

    Godspeed.

    • Posted August 14, 2010 at 4:05 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Point well taken.

      I do think that all the actions at state levels eventually only exist at the discretion of SCOTUS. Arizona’s enforcement law being a case in point. SCOTUS is eventually going to have to decide that. By one stroke of the SCOTUS pen, all the effort in Arizona could be “wasted” from a legal standpoint. SCOTUS has made some decisions that were not what Obama wanted, but I fear that if anything comes up that actually threatens his ability to make his coup complete, SCOTUS will be told what they have to do if they don’t want Soros/Islamists to make another run on the bank.

      The vulnerability in that plan for Soros is that for it to work, they have to let the people who make the decisions know that they have to make a particular decision, and that means that for every angle we press, somebody would have to become aware of a corrupting influence. So that, for instance, Judge Denise Lind would have to be told that she can’t allow Lakin discovery. At that point Denise Lind knows there is foul play and could become one of the brave patriots to stand up and reveal that. Probably only the very top people in command of the branches of government would need to know that Soros/Islamists would destroy the entire Western world’s economy if the coup was hindered. At the time the original run on the bank occurred that would have been President Bush, SCOTUS, and the leaders of Congress (Pelosi and Reid). It probably included Bernanke and Paulson as well, who immediately began to schedule and hold conferences on Sharia-compliant finance.

      We know that Obama threatened the media heads as well, both BEFORE and after the election – the ASSUMPTION being that Obama would be elected and appoint an FCC head to harass and shut down media companies. Under normal circumstances the media could easily have said, “We’ll report this threat and you’ll never get elected because you’ll be sitting in jail, sucker!” But even Fox News submitted as if Obama’s election was inevitable. I can’t help but wonder if the media heads were made privy to information which led them to believe that resistance would be futile – Fox probably being the only media company which would even have considered resisting anyway.

      I think what it all means is that a Republican Congress needs to repeal the damaging laws passed by this coup and pass a law which would neuter anybody’s ability to sabotage the stock market, contest Obama’s veto of those measures on grounds of the 20th Amendment forbidding him from having the presidential power of veto, put a stay on the execution of the laws they are attempting to repeal, and bind up the issue in court until noon January 20, 2013 at which time SCOTUS needs to issue their decision that Obama was not qualified to veto the legislation and stating that the law repealing the Obama administration laws and the law preventing financial sabotage would go into effect immediately, ordering the stock market closed until the protections of the law were operable (somebody should have that developed and ready to install immediately).

      All that would require a very coordinated, deliberate effort on the part of many people. Actually, if Joe Biden pledged to not veto a law protecting the world economy from sabotage, this wouldn’t even have to wait until Jan 20, 2013. It could happen at any time. Biden would immediately be authorized to “act as President” and there would be nothing Soros could do about it, if Biden was willing to stand firm and if SCOTUS had already issued a ruling that the stock market must be closed until the protections were implemented. Actually, if the law itself said that the stock market would be closed until the protections were implemented it would be better. Then SCOTUS could just rule that the law was effective immediately. It would require a liberal justice or the Obama-appointed justices to recuse themselves because of a conflict of interest.

      Somebody said that Biden seemed hesitant to take the oath to defend the Constitution. Biden isn’t the brightest bulb in the pack but I do think he means well and loves this country. And somebody also said that Justice Stevens muttered under his breath to Biden after swearing him in, “Congratulations, Mr President”. I’d REALLY like to hear any unedited recording made by somebody who recorded the inauguration live, to see and hear that. Those clues, if accurate, lead me to think that both SCOTUS and Biden may have been forced into doing what they hate in playing out that farce that day. If so, then they may well be willing to do what it takes to get America out from the hostage situation we’re in. But it would require a Republican-controlled Congress hitting the ground running in January 2011. A lot would have to be ready all at once.

      • SapphireSunday
        Posted August 17, 2010 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

        “Biden isn’t the brightest bulb in the pack but I do think he means well and loves this country.”

        Butteredezillion, we’re on the same wavelength here. I used to think the same of Biden. I cannot explain what we see from him now, but for some kind of blackmail.

        Your theory about the Soros/Islamist threat to the economy rings true and is far preferable to my erstwhile theory, much more frightening, which held that the Russian suitcase nukes fell into the hands of the Saudis, who, being our great friends and allies, placed them in large cities throughout the US and then instructed Congress and SCOTUS to allow them to select our next POTUS and to go along with their takeover of the US, to subjugate us, to steal our resources, to redistribute our wealth, and to install communism and/or an Islamic regime.

        As for Biden, I did also once think he was a patriot. I remember seeing him at hearings. He seemed like a patriot to me. But then his son was involved in silencing Larry Sinclair and he inexplicably was chosen as VP. So has he been co-opted and completely corrupted by power? I hope not. I hope he has a plan. And that he’s waiting for the other shoe to drop.

        Thanks for all your hard work in the cause of freedom.

      • Posted August 17, 2010 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

        For a while I could barely even think of flying the flag any way but upside-down. I felt so betrayed by the conservative justices on SCOTUS, most of all. Their meeting with Obama before the inauguration when they had a potential eligibility suit pending, their “evading” the issue (as Clarence Thomas brought up, unsolicited and initially seriously although he later brushed it off as if a joke), etc…. seems so wrong and angering. The more I see, the more I think they are being held hostage and hate it.

        I asked someone at FR for documentation regarding whether the SCOTUS justices have ever actually signed off on any of the eligibility suit “decisions” they are claimed as making. I was given a list of pages from Orly’s site to look at, which this person says show that none of the justices have ever signed anything as required. I haven’t looked at those pages yet because I’ve had problems with viruses from Orly’s site in the past and I need my computer to be functional right now. I intend to print out the links and head to the library to see what I can find in those links.

        If it’s true that the SCOTUS justices are aware that clerks are signing off for them and pretending that SCOTUS actually carried out a legal decision regarding these cases, and they are willing to have clerks pretend to speak for them so that they can “evade” the issue, that would suggest to me that they don’t want to be on the LEGAL record but won’t put up a stink when they know the whole Constitutional process is not even being followed. That, to me, would suggest that something totally screwy is going on, the SCOTUS justices know it, and there is some reason they allow it to continue.

        Here is what I was sent, in case anybody else is able to check this out before I’m able – which will probably be sometime next week:
        Reference links:
        Justice Thomas hasn’t signed any orders:

        http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12615
        http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12495

        And this: No Justices, neither Alito nor Thomas has signed any orders:

        http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12969

        This link shows the lack of any “Log-In”

        http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=12481

        And today:

        http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=13078
        Writ Of Certiorari filed today

        http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=13078

        Hope this helps clear things up…

  5. thinkwell
    Posted August 14, 2010 at 5:56 pm | Permalink | Reply

    I think you may be underestimating the power of the States under the Constitution. We suffer under what is approaching tyranny because the federal government has usurped powers far beyond that which the Constitution enumerates. I look to see one or more sovereign States call the federal government’s bluff by asserting their rightful independence up to (but fully within) the boundaries set forth by the Constitution. For example, Arizona could simply declare the federal court’s decision striking down most of Arizona State immigration law as Constitutionally overreaching and therefore null and void. This should be done in State court under full due process of law.

    Arizona would then ignore the illegal federal mandates. This would put the federal government in the position of having to use deadly force to get their way and I doubt that they would have the nerve because many of the other States and a large portion of the people would then rise up in solidarity against the feds. Obama would have to willing to risk civil war and, although he is probably sociopathic enough to callously cause the deaths of hundreds or thousands of “his countrymen” that he seems to despise so much, I think he is too much of a wimp and weakling to risk it.

    We the People should call his bluff wherever and whenever we can. And we have to be willing to risk hardship to do it. That stated, your point about taking out Soros’s weapons of mass financial destruction first is well taken. As Patten said, “The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.”

    About Islam, I believe it is fundamentally different from all other major religions in that it was born of evil, rather than merely tragically temporarily misguided. Its prophet Muhammad was a ruthless, evil child molester who founded an ungodly cult that condones and encourages deceit and murder to further its goal of tyrannical submission of all peoples to Islam. It is rotten at its core and beyond reformation or redemption, IMO.

    Our American value of religious freedom demands that we give its followers the right to their beliefs, but at the same time we should openly acknowledge it as a potentially dangerous cult and treat it with deliberate ongoing close scrutiny as a known subversive organization. In particular, its finances should continually be under the microscope. Constant vigilance. — tw

    • Posted August 14, 2010 at 6:36 pm | Permalink | Reply

      All good points.

      It may well come to whether the states would be willing to go that far. They may not have any other option if they want to remain free.

      Every other religion brings shame on itself when its followers are hypocrites, not practicing what they preach. Islam only gains respectability by those who are “moderates” – that is, who reject the non-abrogated teachings of Islam.

      What people need to understand about Islam is the doctrine of abrogation. If 2 sayings of Mohammed disagree, the one that is binding is the one that came latest. IOW, Mohammad had permission to change his mind. He started out thinking the world would be won to over to Islam by talk, but by his later years he said the world would have to be convinced by the sword. People who talk about Islam being a “religion of peace” quote the earlier references and most people – I think probably even some moderate Muslims – don’t realize that the earlier reference of peace was later abrogated by a saying of violence.

      When Prince Charles gathered Muslims of all stripes together to rebuke terrorism a few years ago, he could not get ANYBODY – from any grouping within Islam – to say that Islam rejects the execution of non-Muslims. Those in Islam who know their teachings all agree that non-Muslims are to be executed.

      And the goal of Islam is against the US Constitution. We tend to think of Islam as dangerous because of the violence. But the violence is just means to an end – the suppression of any other belief besides Islam. Of course, they prefer if people convert willingly. But in direct contradiction to the US Constitution, anybody who refuses to convert to Islam is to be killed or taxed into slavery and submission.

      In the Muslim world, sharia trumps everything else. That is why it happened that in Afghanistan – which had a Constitution guaranteeing freedom of religion – a man was still convicted of the crime of converting to Christianity. Condi Rice didn’t understand how this could happen, but it’s because a Constitution means nothing to a nation of Muslims, because Sharia is supreme.

      Incidentally, that is why Muslim countries can make the promises that the UN requires in order to be on the Human Rights Commission, etc. They know that no matter what they agree to for the UN, Sharia trumps UN, Constitution, or anything else. So they can agree to anything in the world, knowing nothing that conflicts with Sharia will get anything but the shaft.

      Notice that the US Constitution has been getting the shaft big-time beginning with the electronic run on the bank. Even before he was elected, Obama had said that the Constitution is problematic because it’s so “limiting”. These days Obama doesn’t even PRETEND that the Constitution limits him. He knows that under sharia NOTHING limits him.

      When we deal with these people we are fools if we don’t realize this. They have a doctrine of taqiyya – that any lie or deception (even doing unclean things to hide that you’re Muslim) is allowable and even holy, if it is intended to further Islam. That’s why the 9-11 perps used whores before 9-11. It was a cover for them. Signing a UN treaty is cover for them. Attending a supposedly Christian church is cover for them.

      Trust anybody who has openly said it is good to lie, and you’re a fool. America needs to wake up and stop being fools while there’s still time.

      I don’t think it’s coincidence that the administration funded by communists and Islamists is now being caught lying at every turn. I don’t think it was coincidence that the guy who stood with convicted terrorists to say that he strongly supports the building of a mosque at Ground Zero is the same guy who told the Egyptian ambassador that he was and still is a Muslim who supports the Muslim agenda (presumably worldwide sharia and the destruction of the US and Israel).

      You may be right, TW. This may well come down to whether the states are willing to live under the lawless regime of a (probably non-citizen) Muslim communist practicing taqiyya, or whether they will fight.

  6. Valentine
    Posted August 17, 2010 at 7:30 am | Permalink | Reply

    Butter & TW,

    TW, you said “Our American value of religious freedom demands that we give its followers the right to their beliefs…”. True, but we do not have to give Islam the status of “religion”. In my opinion, it does not qualify. It has much more in common with questionable para military groups, with (as you said) cults and with ideologies – bad ones. Disqualify Islam as a religion and you remove their tax exempt status and, more importantly, what some fools view as their respectability.

  7. Mrs P
    Posted August 18, 2010 at 12:09 am | Permalink | Reply

    “Lia”Obama’s Adopted Sister Died Suddenly

    http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/08/07/liaobamas-adopted-sister-died-suddenly/#more-4155

    This is a very interesting article, the comments are pretty interesting too. Hope you can find some useful information to use in your quest to dethrone the illegal resident in the White House.

  8. Kanbun
    Posted August 30, 2010 at 4:29 pm | Permalink | Reply

    You make many interesting points. Although, none of it matters because nobody is going to do anything about it. This guy will run for re-election (and quite possibly win), and there won’t be a peep about his constitutional status.

    I must say that your point regarding his “birth certificate” being amended seems to play into his supporters argument. The fact is there is no birth certificate in evidence. Only a COLB, which is NOT a birth certificate. That the COLB might have been amended might be interesting in the context of how Hawaii officials have acted, but even if it wasn’t amended it proves nothing. That aside, we should be concerned that a) there is no birth certificate, and b) that even if born in Hawaii, BHO is not constitutionally qualified because he cannot be a natural born citizen if one parent (his father) is a foregin national.

    Lastly, a fact to relate to the fools that want the COLB to buttress the claim that BHO is “natural born”. It is a known (and documented) fact that his half sister Maya was born in Jakarta, Indonesia. However, she too has a Certificate of Live Birth (COLB-the document being misrepresented as a birth certificate) from Hawaii. Gee, ya think Mom had a plan?

    • Posted August 30, 2010 at 4:52 pm | Permalink | Reply

      The HDOH doesn’t claim there is a Hawaii birth record for Maya Soetoro. Take that for what it’s worth, since they’ve been dishonest with so many other things already.

      I don’t believe that Obama will be able to run again. Every state has a window of time for people to contest the placement of someone’s name on the ballot. That window had closed for the 2008 election before people realized the problems with Obama’s documentation, but there’s not a chance that he’s getting his name on the ballots in every state in the USA without his eligibility issue being addressed.

      At this point, anybody who has suffered particular injury (that the courts can remedy) as a result of Obama acting as president when the Constitution only allows Joe Biden to do so has standing to sue the government for Obama’s illegal use of the Presidential powers (to act as CIC, to appoint cabinet members, to nominate SCOTUS justices, to issue presidential orders, to sign or veto bills, to replace US attorneys, to convene courts-martial, etc) So this isn’t just limited to people who had stakes in the ELECTION. The 20th Amendment does not allow Obama to do any Presidential acts. Everything he has done from Jan 20th onward is on the table for a lawsuit.

      Now, I do believe that what Justice Clarence Thomas said (initially seriously though he later made it appear as a joke) is true – that they’ve been avoiding this issue. Exactly why they are avoiding it deserves further scrutiny. I don’t believe that Thomas would really think it funny that they are avoiding their Constitutional duty. It would be totally contrary to everything the SCOTUS justices have vowed to do. I also don’t think it’s an accident that the SCOTUS justice (Stevens) who called Joe Biden “Mr President” after swearing him in chose to retire from SCOTUS not too long afterward. And I don’t think SCOTUS’ private, confidential meeting with Obama while cases about him were pending was an accident, nor the actual official oath being given in private. I don’t think it’s an accident that Nancy Pelosi gave a standing ovation for Obama in place of where Cheney was supposed to ask for objections to the electoral vote certification (which Cheney never actually did).

      I think we’ve got example after example of people who take their job seriously doing just enough so there is the appearance that they went along with what they were supposed to do – without them actually certifiably doing it. I think we’ve got people like Cheney, Thomas, Stevens, Roberts, GW Bush, etc agreeing to publicly go along with the charade because Soros and the Islamists told them they would make another electronic run on the bank (like the one that led to Congress’ declaration of temporary martial law in 2007) that would destroy the entire western economy if the necessary charade didn’t take place so the communist-Islamist coup could be effected.

  9. Kanbun
    Posted August 30, 2010 at 7:30 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Again, you make many excellent factual points. However, your point that there are so many people that aren’t taking their jobs seriously is precisely why nothing will happen. There is no way that any politician is going to make an issue of this – it only took one objection to stall the electoral vote count – they just aren’t going to do anything. I believe that the only way that anything will happen is if the media does their job. Even those media that are not sympathetic to BHO refuse to do anything and quite often ridicule folks that bring up his eligibility. I believe this is a fairly simple thing, and rests on “natural born citizen”. Of course, if you think the COLB is a birth certificate, imagine how the left would try to define “natural born citizen” if attention was appropriately directed there. The birth certificate is a red herring. It doesn’t matter if he was born in Hawaii (although there is no objective evidence that he was). His father wasn’t a citizen, and he has dual citizenship to this day. There are four Supreme Court cases that define natural born citizen, three of them quote “The Law of Nations”. Congress defined natural born citizen in the US Code in 1790 (later removed). This guy just isn’t constitutionally qualified.

    Unless the media reports the facts and places this is the public discourse as a legitimate issue, BHO will run for re-election and nobody is going to do anything to stop it. I don’t want to hear anything about the constitution from folks that can’t bring themselves to hold BHO’s feet to the fire on his status.

    • Posted August 31, 2010 at 12:28 am | Permalink | Reply

      My hope is that this will ultimately be dealt with on two fronts – the law enforcement front, and the Constitutional front. I believe SCOTUS can and will rule on this if we can put protections in place so that Soros can’t destroy the entire capitalist economy by making a run on the bank. And I think more and more people are realizing the crimes that have been committed in order to perpetrate this hoax.

      And one of the crimes I want to focus on very soon is the crime of concealment – when somebody tells a half-truth (leaving out the full story) in order to deceive. When the subject of their deception is under the jurisdiction of any of the 3 branches of federal government – legislative, judicial, and executive – then concealment is a federal crime.

      There is no doubt at all that Obama, Biden, Gibbs, Brennan, Pelosi, Joe Sandler, Robert Bauer, Fukino, the liars at Factcheck, etc have broken the General Federal False Statement Act (18 U.S.C. 1001, which is the only crime Blago has been convicted of at this point). They’ve also almost certainly committed perjury, obstruction of justice, forgery, and/or misprision of each of those felonies as well.

      The media may not think that they can be held responsible for false reporting but they can – and hopefully will. I have notified various media entities of the facts – as have other people commenting on articles. When someone in the media refuses to correct their factual errors or omits relevant facts of which they are aware, on an issue which is under the jurisdiction of the federal government…. that violated the Federal General False Statement Act.

      I intend to hold the media’s feet to the fire on this particular issue. They no longer have the luxury of ignoring the facts.

      We need SCOTUS to rule on the meaning of “natural born citizen”. And ultimately they are the ones who can see that the 20th Amendment is enforced. Depending on what their decision would be on how the 14th Amendment plays into the “natural born citizen” issue, the birth place could matter. In any event, the facts claimed on the birth certificate itself absolutely matter, because that is where we get any claims of who Obama’s father is, how old Obama is, and where he was born – all of which play into the eligibility issue.

      The fact that Obama posted a forgery rather than reveal that he has nothing legally valid in Hawaii should infuriate the entire American public. It’s not about nutty conspiracy theories. It’s about documented fraud on the part of both the US president (and all his lawyers and administration) and the Hawaii Department of Health (not to mention the Passport Office, the Selective Service, and Social Security offices as well).

      People who don’t give a rip about where Obama was born or what “natural born” means still ought to care that laws are being broken all over the place and that the public is unable to find anybody in government, media, or law enforcement who will make the laws stick.

      I believe the outcry is reaching a point where something’s got to give. The public is no longer asleep; we know the government, media, and law enforcement entities are full of crooks and we’re not going to just assume that they aren’t screwing us.

  10. jayhg
    Posted September 14, 2010 at 9:48 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Butterdezillion, you are a nut. You are all over the web using your “Hawaii has said the birth certificate is a forgery” and THAT IS A OUT RIGHT LIE…….but you keep on and since folks think you are crazy, this just gloss over it and let you be. Every now and then, someone will ask you and you will spout more crazy about some “glamorized” denial. You’re crazy, plain and simple, and you need medical attention before you go postal on your husband and children.

  11. Posted September 30, 2010 at 7:52 am | Permalink | Reply

    so, where is the summary announced in the headline,
    am I missing omething ?

    • Posted September 30, 2010 at 3:28 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Considering all the information that is available, this IS a summary.

      I could shorten it this way: Obama has no legally valid BC from Hawaii so there is no way he could have legally “qualified” by Jan 20th as required by the 20th Amendment. Therefore, the Constitution only allows Joe Biden to “act as President”. Every action Obama has done using the presidential powers has been unlawful.

  12. Posted October 3, 2010 at 6:36 am | Permalink | Reply

    who says this ? Just you ? Is it confirmed independently ?
    What says the constitutional supreme Court ?

    • Posted October 3, 2010 at 12:44 pm | Permalink | Reply

      The Supreme Court has refused to look at the issue. That’s why we have a problem.

  13. teacher
    Posted February 15, 2011 at 7:43 pm | Permalink | Reply

    No one will see this, as it’s months after the last post, but can’t help expressing my disgust at people with an agenda who write in and ridicule and then admit, upon questioning, that they have done no research, have no facts, don’t know who runs fact-check, con’t know what a natural-born citizen is, etc. I’m a teacher, and I can tell ya, kids today are brought up with this “Well, that’s YOUR opinion” thing whenever anyone in the know makes a statement. They really believe what they, with their limited knowledge, think is as valid as the facts from someone who has studied the issue for years.

    Would be funny if not so depressing.

    • Posted February 15, 2011 at 7:54 pm | Permalink | Reply

      That’s what I was thinking last night, too, when somebody told me about Bill O’Reilly saying that people like me are “pinheads”. I’d bet a lot of money that a “pinhead” like me could blow him away in a presentation of basic facts.

      A person is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.

      They will never let this issue be about the facts, because the facts are against Obama’s claims. That’s why in October of 2008 Obama’s lawyers told the major media heads of TV and talk radio which precise facts they were not allowed to mention, on pain of having their companies annihilated via FCC investigations after the election.

  14. Americacan
    Posted March 7, 2011 at 3:45 am | Permalink | Reply

    If only Beck would present this story to America the way he details all his other evidence about Obama. How long do you think it would take to collapse their system? Why the hell is everyone protecting this guy?

    • Posted March 7, 2011 at 1:06 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I’m going to give 2 answers – one that is documented and one that is my hypothesis:

      First, the documented one. The media is protecting this guy because Obama’s lawyers threatened the media companies with FCC annihilation after the election if they reported on the eligibility issue – once before the election and once after, although by now I suspect they may have gotten “reminders” since the last documented instance. The media companies passed that on to their on-air personalities by saying that their careers would be over if they allowed anybody on their shows to talk about it, and strongly implying that their health, lives, and the health and lives of their family members would be in jeopardy as well.

      The Chicago way. More info at http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13373 . Audio of the investigator at
      [audio src="http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour1Aug0709.mp3" /]
      http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour2Aug0709.mp3 and
      http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour3Aug0709.mp3 .

      The second answer is my hypothesis, based on everything I’ve seen, and is really a further explanation of why Obama’s people could assume that Obama’s presidency was inevitable, even though the courts still could have ruled against his eligibility and the media heads could have told him to pound sand and then reported the extortion and put Obama and his thugs in jail. Clearly Obama had something over the media and the judges, for them to be so certain that Obama’s election was inevitable. There’s a thread at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2684174/posts that talks about the possibility that the electronic run on the banks in early September, 2008 had been planned well in advance by Soros and Congressional democrats. My theory, which I briefly describe in that thread, takes that story one step farther and suggests that Obama’s people told (in order) GW Bush, John McCain, Dick Cheney, Judge Surick, the media, Chief Justice John Roberts, the rest of the SCOTUS justices, each of the eligibility judges as their turn each came up, and (possibly, not sure about this one) each of the republican leaders as they came to a critical fork….. that if they did not concede to the demands, Soros and his banking allies with communist and/or Islamist goals who had perpetrated that first run on the bank would do a bigger run, collapsing the entire free world economy and creating the crisis that would finally destroy America and turn her communist/Islamist.

      I know it sounds crazy, but when I look at the timing of various events, judicial betrayals and ethical breaches that don’t make sense, stuff like Judge Surick having his “decision” faxed to him from somebody else and him willingly passing it off as if it was his own in a reversal of the earnestness he had previously shown (as well as seemingly deliberate ethics violations by judges, such as Roberts inviting Obama to SCOTUS for ex parte communication when multiple cases against Obama were pending, Judge David Carter in the middle of a case about Obama and right before totally reversing his judgments and demeanor hiring as clerk a guy from the law firm that had represented Obama, etc), Pres Bush’s sudden reversal from silence on the economic situation to saying the entire western world would be destroyed if they didn’t pass TARP – on the exact same day that McCain was called by Obama and suspended his campaign and wanted the debates canceled (basically conceding defeat)….. there’s way too much to document in one place. I had intended to do a major post on the evidence that makes me think this is what happened, but for right now I’m in the middle of working on Nebraska’s eligibility bill, which could actually give a way for all these theories to eventually be legally investigated. So that’s my priority.

      It sounds crazy, but without this missing piece of the puzzle, nothing makes sense. With it, everything makes sense. It has predicted behavior, and new information so far has always fit the theory (such as someone in the above thread talking about a CIA operative saying they had found on revolutionaries’ computer in Colombia talk that the revolutionaries had been assured that Obama’s election was a done deal – back when Hillary was the front-runner, which also supports what the Hillary folks have been saying about the primary also being rigged).

      It also explains Beck’s behavior. O’Reilly is a sell-out; he’s doing nothing for conservatism as far as I can tell – not on the eligibility issue or anything else, so he hasn’t just sold out on the eligibility issue. Beck, though, is a different story. Having been told that he and his family could be killed if he reported on the eligibility issue, he armed himself with a bullet-proof vest, got security for himself (and possibly his family, though I don’t know anything in particular about that), and began to expose Soros’ thuggish behavior. I believe he knows that Soros and his buddies made the electronic run on the bank in Sept 2008 because the threats to Beck personally hinged on that action of Soros. And Beck is fighting the ROOT of the eligibility issue – what has made the eligibility issue taboo for everybody and this usurpation possible – even though he publicly has to ridicule the issue.

      When people called in to his show to try to force him to cover the issue they didn’t realize that he had been threatened. That story didn’t come out until later. They didn’t realize that his silence on the matter was the best he could do on that particular issue. But he DID respond to their concerns in the only way he could: by attacking the root of the problem. And ultimately, the eligibility issue will not be able to be resolved until that bigger conspiracy is exposed so it no longer has power over us. And getting our financial house in order so that we are not vulnerable to the Soros manipulations that have toppled national economy after national economy is absolutely critical. That is what is really at stake in places like Madison, and is why the thugs, inside the administration and allied to the administration, are increasingly showing their true colors without worrying about what people think about them. We’re reaching the point where electoral politics doesn’t matter. What matters is whether the economy can remain so vulnerable that Soros and his communist/Islamist allies can continue to hold America’s leadership hostage by the threat of another run on the bank.

      We are in a very, very serious situation. This is what Cloward-Piven and the Soviet plan to subvert America have been working on for a long, long time – pushing toward the economic and electoral crisis that will destroy America and allow the communists to take over. The communists have allied themselves with the Islamists. Soros has said that capitalism and America are the enemy and that he is afraid America will win the war on terror because then she and capitalism would be strong – IOW, he sees terrorism as a way to keep America and capitalism at bay and perhaps overthrow them. Obama himself is the union of communism and Islamism; look at who has bankrolled him and who his allies are. And folks like Farrakhan – who is applauding the union protests and saying that Egypt is coming to America, an Islamic uprising – are allies to both Islamists and communists. It is the union of the two beasts that want to destroy freedom in America and the world.

      Beck is diligently going after those beasts. He is a friend in this battle, definitely. His family needs him to ease off the eligibility issue, and I’m sure he hasn’t allowed himself to even hear the evidence about Obama’s ineligibility because that would only make it harder to do what he’s forced to do, so he may actually be ignorant about all this evidence as well. But he is going after the roots of the movement to totally destroy the US. When all this finally comes out, Beck will be seen as lifting one side of the rock that has been trying to crush America, and the eligibility folks will be seen as lifting the other side of the rock. Because it took both sides of that rock. Without the threat of another run on the bank, Obama could not have been elected, and without Obama being elected they didn’t have a way to hold the Islamists into the alliance to MAKE the run on the bank. (I believe that is why Hillary couldn’t be allowed to win; she IS a “natural born citizen” and as such – and as a feminist – she could not agree to the Islamist/terrorist wing of the plan, which was essential to having the kind of money to make the kind of threat necessary).

      Both Beck and the eligibility folks like you and me are doing what we can, and together we will get America out from under this rock. Beck is not ridiculing the eligibility issue any more, as far as I know. I think the ridicule was a response to people trying to force him to do what his kidnappers told him he couldn’t do unless he wanted his family dead. The people who pressured him had no way of knowing he was being kidnapped; now that we know, we can see that he is still fighting to get Obama out of power, but doing it the only way allowed him.

      When we realize what is really going on, we know who we can count on for what parts of the battle. Neither the liberal media nor Fox are free to help us straight-out on the eligibility issue, even if they wanted to. We need to look for other ways of getting the word out there. And that’s why the blogs and grassroots, word of mouth efforts have to be used – and they are being effective.

      When we realize how critical the failure of the US economy is to Obama and his allies/handlers’ plans, we know what kind of pressure and some of the threats that may be made in places like Wisconsin and in DC. We realize what the judges are facing, and perhaps can modify the plans so that SCOTUS won’t hear the critical eligibility cases until AFTER the economy has stabilized to a point where the justices don’t think a Soros/Islamist run on the bank could be effective. We can recognize that Congress is working in a delicate situation similar to an aneurism, where there is a critical threat that has to be removed (the extreme vulnerability of the US economy) but any move that causes the aneurism to travel to the brain (Soros et al to decide to make a run on the bank again) would be fatal.

  15. Tom
    Posted March 31, 2011 at 8:30 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Actually, Obama never took the Oath of office, either – Remember he stumbled over the words… that was no accident. He is hedging against the possibility that he will be accused of taking the Oath when he knew he was ineligible.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: