Either Judge Leon is a fool, or he’s corrupt, or he’s been bought. In Strunk’s case he ruled that:
1) a search of records from 1978 and later was a “reasonable search” for records from before 1967.
2) The following proof is not enough to overcome the “presumption of good faith”
a) the fact that the claims in the “cable” submitted with an affidavit are disproven by government records (retention schedule changes and destruction records that would have to exist if the claims were accurate, but don’t exist)
b) the fact that the DOS attorney deliberately removed critical words when quoting Jacobsen’s affidavit, in order to reverse the meaning of what Jacobsen actually said.
I’d like to know exactly what kind of evidence WOULD be enough to convince this knot-head judge that maybe somebody is lying and perpetrating a fraud on his court.
Folks, this country has no rule of law. The judges are just as lawless as the convicts. We are Iran.