Long-Form Forgery for Dummies

Longform Forgery for DummiesThis has to be as a PDF so you can magnify the images.

The only non-manipulable image of Obama’s long-form that would have to show the certifying seal is an alleged photograph of the certified long-form. Unlike scans or black and white photocopies, actual photos always show evidence of a seal, as I document here through photographs of my own daughter’s death certificate.

But the alleged photo of Obama’s certified long-form shows no sign of a seal.

That proves that what he showed reporters was NOT the certified copy he received from the HDOH. It had no seal, and the reporters totally spaced off what any one of us who researches this stuff would have immediately checked, since it is the only part that gives the paper any legal value.

Obama had certified copies from the HDOH and he chose to present to the entire world something else, while CLAIMING it was what the HDOH sent him. Presumably it was a print-out of the manipulated PDF. If no manipulation had been necessary Obama could have simply shown the media the actual certified copy, as he CLAIMED to do. The absence of the seal gives it all away.


Somebody said there is a seal that can be seen if you adjust the contrast and brightness. I set both these images for the highest contrast, set them both at -20 for brightness, and lined them up so the cross-hatches are the same size. Compare for yourself. The link is at the bottom.

I left this in Word because that’s the program I have where I can adjust contrast. I am not technologically sophisticated – and in a world where stuff can be manipulated digitally I think it does some good to look at what is actually in front of our eyeballs. If we have to magnify to this degree to see even a HINT of a tiny squiggle somewhere then you can bet your bottom dollar that no reporter looked at this with their naked eyes and saw a seal. A seal that requires this kind of manipulation defeats the whole purpose of a physical raised seal – which is to have an immediately visible sign that the paper in front of you is the same paper that the HDOH sent from their office.

I am a housewife with four kids and a husband to tend to and no computer expertise. In 5 minutes or less I could take a photo of the whole death certificate and post it on my blog with varying angles, close-ups of the seal, etc to give a convincing proof that the document I have is authentic. But with all the resources and personnel at Obama’s disposal this is the best he can come up with? Come ON, people. There is no excuse for this crap.

With Contrast

For those who get a hassle with a Word document, here’s the file as a PDF: PDF with-contrast

UPDATE 2: For those who say the photo isn’t really a photo but is just a jpg version of the same scan used in the PDF, here is a comparison of the PDF with the jgp of the “photo”.  Comparison of Degrading Quality

Because the quality degrades, it is a good bet that whether this claimed “photo” is a photo or a scan, it is a photo or scan OF THE MANIPULATED PDF. And we’re still left with no PHOTO of an ACTUAL CERTIFIED COPY.

This whole thing is so senseless. The HDOH sent a paper document with a seal. If you want to convince people that you’ve got a paper document with a seal the best way is to let them see, hold, photograph, and videotape it. Refusing to do that and instead making scans of it in a format where the content of it can be manipulated is the worst thing they could do, if they wanted to make their case for authenticity. It’s the perfect thing to do if they want to increase suspicions while thumbing their nose at people for having questions in the first place. 

There is not one media person who saw a real certified birth certificate, and the only things they or we have been given are manipulable images. The media is ridiculing US because they were too stupid to know how to verify the authenticity of a birth certificate. Incredible. Absolutely incredible.


  1. Posted May 5, 2011 at 2:36 am | Permalink | Reply

    The whole argument rests on a claim that there is a photo of the long form to compare, but what is identified as a photo is obviously not a photo because a photo would not have perfectly uniform lighting and be perfectly perpendicular to the document. It’s a scan. Even though the Huffington Post uses the word “photo” in their article, all they are showing is the same scanned PDF the White House released, only reduced in size to fit on their page.

    “Dummy books” should be written by experts for dummies. A dummy for dummies is the blind leading the blind.

    • Posted May 5, 2011 at 5:04 am | Permalink | Reply

      This is not the same as the PDF scan. The PDF has a faint circle that could be a seal. This doesn’t. And this one specifically says PHOTO. The file is a jpg, not a PDF.

      I’ve got a full-page scan of the death certificate that has uniform lighting over the whole thing, except for the edge and that’s only because it is curled from being in the same position for a long time. I would post it except I don’t want the personal information for my husband and me disclosed.

      Even if it was a scan, there would still be the problem that you’ve got two different versions – one with a seal and one without. And the only image we’ve got where there is even a hint of a seal is a document that is specifically in a manipulable format.

    • Louis
      Posted May 6, 2011 at 6:56 pm | Permalink | Reply


      But that’s not so, says Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator.
      “You should not be so suspicious about this,” Tremblay told FoxNews.com, dismissing the allegations.

      HERE IS THE UNBIASED “EXPERT”, GIVING A REVIEW OF A BOOK TITLED:(Yes We Did! An inside look at how social media built the Obama brand)


      P.S. Dr. Conspiracy, you wouldn’t happen to be Jean-Claude Tremblay?

  2. kelley
    Posted May 5, 2011 at 5:19 am | Permalink | Reply

    the guy is a total fraud, through and through. End of story.

  3. Tony
    Posted May 5, 2011 at 2:03 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Sometimes is better to let people think you are an idiot, than to open our mouth and remove all doubt. What a waste of sperm, your dad should have used a condom.

    • Posted May 5, 2011 at 3:04 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Tony, I try to run a classy place. But I let comments like that stand because they illustrate so well the difference between those who engage with the evidence and have real content to add to the discussion and those who don’t.

  4. NJ_Tom
    Posted May 5, 2011 at 5:40 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Check the work posted by Miss Tickly and others on FR. Easy to see that it’s a forgery – scanned check boxes with scanner artifacts will never be identical – but there are several instances of cloned check boxes that support the theory that the Nordyke twins’ LFBC was used as the basis of the forgery.
    Also easy to spot is the fact that some parts of the pdf are pixelated at 1/4 the size of the rest. You absolutely can NOT scan a document at two different resolutions simultaneously. The higher resolution components have to have been pasted in – and it’s NOT the result of turning OCR on. (the current, favored explanation of all the layers in the pdf).
    The forgery is, in fact, SO CRUDE, that it must have been done deliberately. So, the questiopn is, what are they trying to accomplish? They know the MSM will never report it, but perhaps it’s intended to encourage us Eligiblilty Questioners to stick with Trump, so that he goes for a third-party candidacy. Any ideas?

    • Posted May 5, 2011 at 6:45 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Yes, I’ve seen some of the analysis. Good clues as to how the PDF has been manipulated.

      The very fact that it was scanned into a format that ALLOWS manipulation would negate the value of the PDF anyway, even if there weren’t these many other signs of tampering.

      The only way to authenticate that the document was even the same as what the HDOH sent was through the seal – a non-manipulated paper document with a raised seal on it.

      I think this blatant forgery was their way of telling us little people that they are invincible, that nothing we do or learn can ever touch them. Same message they’re giving by the pathetic way they’re handling the Osama Bin Laden story. They’re doing this because they can, and to show us that no matter how blatant their contempt for the truth, laws, and the people, they will get away with it. It’s basically spitting on us and it makes me think they have no fear of another election ever holding them accountable.

      The next few weeks will tell us a lot.

  5. Ari
    Posted May 5, 2011 at 6:53 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Get some help, kid.

  6. Tommy Thompson
    Posted May 6, 2011 at 4:40 am | Permalink | Reply

    Butter, one of our members posted this comparison of several letters on the long form PDF file. As mentioned above, the letters were either copied and pasted into place or cloned. This would be impossible if this image Obama posted was photo of a real document. http://i595.photobucket.com/albums/tt35/p5151/1ss50.jpg

  7. Tommy Thompson
    Posted May 6, 2011 at 4:45 am | Permalink | Reply

    I forgot to mention that this is just the tip of the iceburg. There are many more identical letters. Plus in Stanley’s signature the name Dunham is in two parts. The “D” is in totally different resolution than the “unham” part. I estimated approximately 500 individual pixels in the letter “B”. To have all 500 pixels line up EXACTLY the same in two locations in this document is virtually impossible…to have it happen in multiple locations is beyond impossible.

  8. Tommy Thompson
    Posted May 6, 2011 at 6:10 am | Permalink | Reply

    Butter, I looked at the long form at 1600% and 800% and there is NO sign of any seal…you’re right about that. That is extremely important as is the proof that this image has been manipulated. Notice here that the D in Dunham looks different than the rest of the letters. That is because they were created at two different times.

    • Posted May 6, 2011 at 12:46 pm | Permalink | Reply

      If you change the contrast and brightness there are a couple little squiggles in the place where a seal would be. But if we have to do that kind of manipulation to observe anything and then it’s just a few squiggles then this is NOT a photograph of a seal, and anybody looking at the document with the naked eye would not be able to detect anything at all. Could be a photograph of a printout of the manipulated PDF. Or a jpg of the manipulated PDF.

      I’ve sent an e-mail to the author of the article where it is said to be a photograph, asking details on who photographed it and when. I will report what I find.

      Somebody should collect all the anomalies on the PDF which show the manipulations that have been done.

  9. Tommy Thompson
    Posted May 6, 2011 at 6:12 am | Permalink | Reply

    Butter, here’s another example: Look at the “R”…this can only be created by editing.

  10. NoBama NoMore....
    Posted May 6, 2011 at 5:39 pm | Permalink | Reply

    So what’s the Real Deal with the latest version of BHO’s birth certificate?

    Well, back in the day when BHO was just an Illinois State Senator, maybe around 2000, and he first thought about someday considering a presidential bid, he realized that he could not produce a bona fide Hawaii birth certificate. So the Chicago machine went into action.

    First they would need someone inside the Hawaii DOH to destroy the original document on file and any computer references to him. No problem, these are Chicago operatives.

    Next they would need to hack into the Hawaii DOH database and add the required information to allow the production of a computer generated COLB. Either that or have someone in Hawaii with access to the database just add it in there.

    They also knew that sooner or later they might have to produce a REAL birth certificate that could stand up to forensic testing. No problem, just create the document using someone else’s birth certificate and change everything to suit your needs.

    Then begin the enhanced aging process by using alternating UV lighting, darkness, humidifiers and dehumidifiers and other specialized processes, to make it appear to be over 40 years old. Well this process takes time, maybe about 10 years.

    So that brings us 2007 or 2008 when he orders the COLB from Hawaii, which probably looks legitimate, but wanting to mess with the heads of the newly formed “Birther” movement, he manipulated the document to make it appear that it was altered even though it wasn’t.

    So that brings us to 2010, time to plant the artificially aged birth certificate into the bound books at the Hawaii DOH. Since everyone in government in Hawaii is in BHO’s pocket, that was probably not that hard to do. The birth certificate gets planted and now he just has to wait for the right time to spring it. He probably wanted it to continue to age a little more in Hawaii, but Donald Trump was stirring the pot so much that he had to release something.

    No problem, have the registrar of records in Hawaii pull the planted document and make a copy of it and send it to the WH. So far so good, but lets mess with the American people again and manipulate the document, take stuff out and put it right back in again. Nothing is actually changed, it just looks that way. Everyone who studies the document through Adobe Illustrator will cry out “It’s another forgery”.

    It’s still early in 2011. Plenty of time.

    Meanwhile more time is wasted by the American public, and the document continues to age some more.

    So pretty soon it will be mid 2012, in the heat of his reelection campaign, and the birthers and the conspiracy theory people are just about beside themselves. Even his republican opponent has mentioned it a time or two. Time to make the BIG move and destroy all the credibility of all his opponents.

    Make a trip to Hawaii and bring along any entity that wants to see the REAL thing be exposed to the light of day. Media, Congress person, Senator, opposition lawyers, and a Supreme Court Judge or two just for good measure. Have an outside video production crew film the entire event. Walk into the DOH building, have the registrar open the bound book and remove the birth certificate and hand to a team of three independent forensic experts and let them begin their analysis and testing. Show this live on every TV station in the world and on every internet server that wants to show it.

    Then Mr. President, cross your fingers and tell the world, “There it is, I told you so. All these nutjobs are dead wrong. Now lets get on with my reelection”.


    • Posted May 6, 2011 at 6:25 pm | Permalink | Reply

      The question of why such an obvious forgery is the perplexing one. I think demoralizing us is one reason.

      You’ve suggested that he’s buying some time. Could be, although I think Abercrombie wouldn’t have come out in the LA Times and NY Times at Christmas time with such bravado if he wasn’t planning on actually coming out with the forged BC. Something stopped him then; I suspect 2 things: his DOH Director, Neal Palafox, balked at stealing somebody else’s BC# and inserting the forgery (which is why Abercrombie had to make him resign and why the spokespeople for Abercrombie and the HDOH both lied by claiming Abercrombie hadn’t asked him to resign, and why the AG had to pretend that there was a billing fraud investigation of Palafox when he knew there wasn’t and Palafox would have had to be informed if there had been) AND there was talk of state eligibility bills expressly granting legal standing for “the common people” to challenge eligibility in court and subpoena the embedded transaction logs which would show tampering with the records.

      Abercrombie said it was “actually written down” in the state archives. Fukino said Obama’s birth record was “half-typed, half-handwritten”. That doesn’t fit what Obama has shown.

      Obama argued in court that he shouldn’t have to disclose his BC because it would be too “embarrassing”. But that doesn’t fit what Obama has shown either.

      The HDOH has indirectly confirmed that the BC was amended in 2006. That doesn’t fit what Obama has shown.

      By Obama claiming this BC was from the HDOH, he’s setting himself up for forgery charges if they eventually come up with a document that actually fits the statements given over the past 3 years. Of course, right now they should all be getting questions about why what Obama presented doesn’t match what they’ve said over the past 3 years, but that only happens when you actually have a functioning media and law enforcement. And this whole fiasco has revealed that we don’t. Not even close.

      Somebody suggested it could be a diversionary tactic to keep us from noticing something else he or his handlers are doing. I’d say look for it to be something they can blame somebody else on – a “terrorist” attack or a “natural” disaster, both of which can also be manipulated.

      I find it hard to believe that anybody could be this incompetent at handling the story of Osama Bin Laden. It smacks of diversion also. Not the actual raid on Bin Laden necessarily but the circus surrounding the stories we were told about it; the story changes every other minute. Both that and the forged BC hurt Obama’s long-term credibility but they would serve the purpose well if he knows he doesn’t have to worry about the long-term because he’s got something big up his sleeve that he wants to hit us with before we can protect ourselves.

      I know this sounds crazy, but we’re dealing with the same people who most probably orchestrated the financial crisis that has set the world aflame – especially in the Middle East. Soros has said that he doesn’t want America to win the war on terror because then America and capitalism will be strong, and he views those as the world’s greatest evils. This guy Soros seriously thinks he’s God and he is allies now with the Islamists such as Ahmadinejad who believes the Middle East uprisings are a sign from Allah that he is supposed to usher in Armageddon and the return of the 12th Imam.

      I guess we’ll have to wait and see but I fear that the contempt Obama/Soros has for America will be shown in ever more extreme and wanton ways. All the technology the US has is at the disposal of these madmen who hate the US. A very, very sobering thought. I hope if there are any military people reading this, they grasp what I am saying here. Nothing is impossible to Obama as long as he has the audacity to use the technology we have. As he gets more blatantly belligerent towards the American way and realizes that his credibility is totally shot, he will increasingly have nothing to lose. And then all bets are off.

  11. charlene
    Posted May 6, 2011 at 5:53 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Butter, As always, very well done.
    I keep asking, why,with the technology available , did they put out such a sham? I believe u answered the question! Total arrogance. They know the lsm can not report the facts that fly out,in a 2 ND graders face, showing the forgery & manipulation. TTO @ Obama soetoro exposed can make a BC that we could accept. Why can’t the wing nits in the West Wing? Answer
    .. They have no desire. They not only laugh at us, who only seek truth, you can bet they are also laughing at the ” gullibles” Gullibles need no reason to believe, they just do! They call us names and love pulling the tired old race card. We had the Trump card, where is he in all this now? I have been out of the loop recently. Is Trump giving up or is he busy verifying?
    You have always maintained expert insights and have remained cool when challenged by those who are still asleep. Keep on, you will succeed. Truth will always conquer!

  12. Tommy Thompson
    Posted May 7, 2011 at 4:42 am | Permalink | Reply

    NoBamaNoMore, that’s a lot of wild assumptions. I would suggest the answer is much more simple. So many people wanted to see Obama become the president that they completely ignored all reason. There was no well thought out plan…just a simple lie that was ignored. Fukino was simply asked to verify Obama’s eligibility but instead of coming out and saying…I’ve seen his original birth certificate and he was born at one of hospitals here in Hawaii in 1961, she carefully made the statement that she had looked at Obama’s “birth records” according to state law. Then later under what appears to be a tremendous amount of pressure she begin making other statements to back up what her bosses and president wanted her to say. Her first simple statement could mean a lot of different things…maybe she saw the registraion form that was filled out by Madeline Dunham…who knows? One lie has led to another…there is no complex plot behind all of this. The release of the supposed long form birth certificate has got to be one of the most stupid things ever. It’s not a photo of a birth certificate in a bound book…it’s a creation in a photo program…that’s a fact. If he actually did have a birth certificate with the same information it would be too late. What he has offered is a fraud…pure and simple.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: