I have a new major post up – the first in a series of posts about the birth announcements. This one is called “What’s Wrong with the Announcement Stories” . The summary: I believe somebody at the Advertiser made copies and distributed them to various people with instructions to pass them off as legitimate.

Welcome, everyone, including World Net Daily readers. If you’re looking for the article about the Hawaii Democratic Party refusing to certify Obama’s eligibility, it is here. I hope you’ll stay and look around. =)

An index to the subject matter on this blog is here.

Or – if any of these are of interest – some handy links to help you make sense out of this place =)

“The Summary CNN Doesn’t Want You to See” at https://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/08/09/the-summary-cnn-doesnt-want-you-to-see/ – a summary of how we know Obama did not “qualify” by January 20, 2009.

“Red Flags in Hawaii” at https://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/ – the main post linking to evidence that Obama’s birth certificate has no legal value

“The Whopper That Got Away” at https://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/08/26/the-whopper-that-got-away-4/ – evidence that the Passport Office didn’t destroy passport applications from 1920-1967, as they claimed in an affidavit.

“Certificate of Nomination Summary”  https://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/09/09/certificate-of-nomination-summary/ – why Nancy Pelosi and Alice Travers Germond signed a different certificate of nomination for Hawaii than for other states.

Now, back to the regularly-scheduled broadcasting – “About” – why any of this stuff even matters…..


News reports stated that in Mexico, drug lords killed a rival member and sewed his face onto a soccer ball. The difference between Mexico and The USA is law enforcement. In Mexico law enforcement is sold to the highest bidder. If America ever reaches that point, guard your children because anything can happen to them and you can’t do a thing to stop it.

Obama’s eligibility is and always has been about law enforcement, because our entire system of law enforcement of already-existing laws has utterly failed. This has nothing to do with politics.

It doesn’t much matter whether the guy with his face sewn on the soccer ball was a democrat or republican, or whether he favored or opposed healthcare reform or any other political issue. If there is nobody willing to enforce a law, that law doesn’t exist. Period. Why argue about what laws get made and by whom, if the laws we have are enforced like Mexico’s?

That is the issue here. You can say, as did our Senators a few years ago regarding perjury and obstruction of justice, “Tee-hee. It’s just about sex. It doesn’t matter.” Or in this case you can say, “The birthers are crazy. Move on.”

The subject of the investigation is irrelevant; the fact that law enforcement refuses to investigate is the issue. When lawless people get control of a system and manipulate what gets enforced, you’ve become Chicago. Or Mexico. Today the subject not being investigated is the violation of open records laws and government cover-up of known forgery. Those crimes have allowed a person into office who has committed extortion (threatening anyone who would report on Obama’s eligibility, as well as lawyers for car dealers) and who violated bankruptcy law to steal money from secured investors and give it to unions instead. For a wider-angle view of his actions so far (with links) see herehere,  and here. (I gave up on keeping score after 6 months).

You can laugh at extortion & government cover-ups of forgery and perjury if you think it’s just about – tee-hee – birthers, but I’m telling you right now: If law enforcement doesn’t matter, then welcome to Mexico. I hope your children have a good time kicking your face when they see it sewn onto a soccer ball. Because by refusing to address this you are consigning your children to that kind of world.

Seriously think about “The Dark Knight” – which gave my kids nightmares for weeks. Watch it again so you can clearly remember what lawlessness looks and feels like. If, like me, you would die before willingly handing your kids’ future over to lawlessness, then keep reading at  https://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/


  1. Steven Whitener
    Posted February 2, 2010 at 10:59 am | Permalink | Reply

    Removed for inappropriate content

  2. yo
    Posted February 8, 2010 at 3:19 pm | Permalink | Reply

    I just saw on another blog a post that was attributed to you that talked about obama’s ammendment having to be between some certain dates. I don’t see your post for it here, but the article said you hadn’t posted it yet.

    I comment your work and it’s logic. My only thought is that it all depends on the hawaii doh accurately following it’s procedures and being truthful in all their answers to requests for info. And there’s the rub.

    I have come to the point where I don’t have much faith in what the haw doh is saying. We can’t trust them for accuracy. Remember, they put out that reslease saying obama is a nbc. Now the post and email tells us the haw attorney generals office won’t confirm that they ever told the doh that.

    All the speculation has some value but i’m just not going to believe any of it until i see the vital records. Your logic is impeccable, but it depends on the doh being truthful, and it this point their credibility is shot.

    • Posted February 8, 2010 at 11:10 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Right. And that’s what they want us to think. They want us to realize that they could just as easily be lying as telling the truth and we will never have any way to know the difference.

      But law enforcement would. The DOH has had over 4 months in which to change their answer to the correct one if they were “mistaken” to Terri K. Their answers have been appealed in many cases. If they’re telling the truth it’s bad news for Obama. That should force an investigation of Obama and Factcheck, on the legal presumption that government officials are truthful. If the investigation found that the DOH was untruthful those workers should lose their jobs – for incompetence if nothing else. If it found that the DOH was truthful, then Obama should lose his job.

      Government officials all over the country need to know that they can’t make questions or their duty go away just by stinking up the place so that nobody can trust any of their answers. When answers can’t be trusted it is DEFINITELY time for an investigation, to insure that the credibility and integrity of the system is maintained or regained.

      I’ve given up trying to figure out what is in Obama’s records. There are way too many ways that the DOH and Obama could worm their way around anything they wanted to. But by pointing out what it means if we take the DOH at their word I hope to show that it is WAY past time for a criminal investigation of this matter. The American people deserve answers and officials that will do the job right.

  3. yo
    Posted February 8, 2010 at 3:22 pm | Permalink | Reply

    I made a type above. I meant to say in the second paragraph that i commend your work, not comment. sorry

  4. susan elaine
    Posted February 28, 2010 at 2:05 am | Permalink | Reply

    Just want to let you know that I follow your blog and very much appreciate the hard work you do to research and post this. You are a patriot.

  5. yo
    Posted April 10, 2010 at 12:36 pm | Permalink | Reply

    I keep coming back to the very thing you’ve hit upon in this post.
    If they overlook the law on eligibility, why in the world would anyone be surprised that they overlook the law in health care reform or anything else.
    Eligibility is the starting point. Alas, even brilliant legal minds like mark levin won’t go along with us on this, though.

    As for new info, it seems that thepostemail is saying that the hawaii doh won’t confirm to them that obama has index data, etc for aug 4, 1961 (if i read their post correctly). But, as some of us recall, leo d seemed to have stopped his entire hawaii investigation after the hawaii doh confirmed to him that they had index data for obama for aug 4, 1961, and that it was not added later, but on that date.

    We’re never going to get the truth on hearsay. We need the records.

    • Posted April 10, 2010 at 1:05 pm | Permalink | Reply


      I’ve seen the UIPA request and response that Leo got and I’m not convinced that it was airtight. It seemed to me that they phrased their answer more as a Glomar response. I’ll check that again. My own suspicion is that they did have an application by then but it was not completed until 2006. The issue is what conditions have to be met before they say somebody has an index record. If you look on the form to request a BC copy, the “For Office Use” portion lists several indices they are supposed to check off when they’ve looked there – including Pending or No Records. I’m wondering if they have to have somebody on SOME KIND of index list if they’ve got ANY papers on them at all.

      Unfortunately, the HDOH is simply not answering any questions and they say they don’t have records describing any of their processes, protocols, and standards – even though they are required by law to have that on hand for public inspection. We really are dealing with a situation of utter lawlessness. They are blatantly crapping all over the laws and the people who are supposed to hold them accountable are thumbing their noses at us all. It’s a game of “chicken”. The way to force it would be through a lawsuit but why we would expect a Hawaiian judge to break from the Hawaiian standard of total corruption?

    • Posted April 10, 2010 at 1:45 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Yes, I’ve just looked at the UIPA request and responses that Leo got. I’d post them here except that the copies I’ve got are barely readable and will be even worse if I upload them. Basically Leo asked to see whatever documents they have, pre-dating Aug 9th, that contributed to the decision to say that his record had been “filed” on Aug 8, 1961.

      Okubo’s response was, “I do not possess the record you requested”, apparently with a Notice to Requestor with just the “Unable to provide” box checked and not the clarification as to why it could not be provided – whether because the record doesn’t exist, or because disclosure is prohibited.

      Leo wrote back for clarification to the DOH and cc’ed to the OIP. Cathy Takase then swooped in to save the day by saying that Okubo clearly believed that the only records she would have that would be responsive would be birth records and associated documents, which are protected from disclosure. Takase said Okubo should have cited the law stating that vital records and associated documents are protected from disclosure.

      The way that Takase worded her response was basically, “You are being denied access to the records, if any, because they would be birth records which are exempt from disclosure.” So what she said was basically that the very existence of documents pre-dating Aug 9th is protected from disclosure. She said it was a denial of access, but the way she worded it was a GLOMARIZED denial of access. At least that’s how it looks to me. Leo’s an attorney and thinks otherwise so maybe I’ve got it wrong, but I’ve dealt with these people extensively and know that they’ve used a lot of ways to Glomarize their responses other than putting in the clear “if any” statement.

      And as I understand it, if Aug 8 is a piece of information on the birth record, they truly are unable to disclose it, or anything which would reveal what date IS on the BC – unless the disclosure is through an authorized means, such as a non-certified abbreviated birth certificate (COLB) – which is authorized for release to anybody who asks for it. But alas! They refuse to acknowledge that 338-18(a) only forbids disclosures that are NOT authorized by law or administrative rules. The non-certified COLB is authorized by the admin rules for release to anybody so it never falls under the HRS 338-18a that they keep citing as their reason to deny access.

      So my understanding is that Okubo botched the response and Takase flew in to save the day by giving a proper Glomarized response. Leo’s basis for asking was Obama’s disclosure of a COLB using the Aug 8, 1961 date. When I asked Takase directly whether an item already disclosed by the DOH has lost its privacy interest she said:

      “You ask: “And if they have revealed this to me, then have the privacy concerns for that record been waived through the DOH’s announcement to me.”
      No. An agency cannot waive an individual’s privacy rights or, applicable here, protection afforded by statute. ”

      The truth of the matter is that OBAMA published the information – which is different than the DOH disclosing it and which DOES negate the privacy interest. What both Leo and I used as the basis for our requests was the fact that the DOH had disclosed informaton. There’s an OIP Opinion Letter which says that if an agency wrongfully discloses protected information, the privacy interest in that information has not been waived, but if the PERSON specifically gives the information in a published document the privacy interest is waived. So Obama’s privacy interest in the Aug 8, 1961 filing date was waived when he posted the COLB on the Fight the Smears site and (as the DOH now says on its web page) when he posted it on the Factcheck site.

      But why should Hawaii obey that rule, since they won’t obey anything else? Which gets us back to the original issue: lawlessness.

  6. yo
    Posted April 10, 2010 at 7:45 pm | Permalink | Reply

    It is indeed. Utter lawlessness. And wearing it like a medal, shoving it in our faces, and laughing about it, to boot.

    I’ve just about given up that we’re going to actually get to the truth by research. I do have hope that maybe just one single state legislature may pass a law requiring the bc for the 2012 election. It should be interesting watching obama’s people, including the press, try to get around such a law. Given how much time they have, i really wouldn’t put it past them to manufacture documents. If they’ve gone this far, who would stop them from doing that.

    Or, a one in a million shot of somebody in the haw doh, or hacker, just unlawfully getting the goods. Once again, it would be funny watching the press spend all day, and night, screaming about the unlawful act that had been committed……on the part of the hacker, not obama, even if his records turn out to be baloney!

  7. George
    Posted April 16, 2010 at 4:03 am | Permalink | Reply

    Keep up the great work. You are absolutely right that the failure to follow the Constitution re: eligibility is the “original sin” that compromises the entire Obama Presidency and demonstrates that we really don’t know the limits of how far they’ll be willing to go in contravention to the Constitution. This is the essential battle for the basic foundation of our country, and if we lose it, it’s all over for America. Lt. Colonel Lakin has taken a brave stand, and he should be supported.


  8. LibertyBelle
    Posted April 24, 2010 at 10:40 am | Permalink | Reply

    Did President Obama really spend huge sums of money (up to $2 million in some accounts) to prevent his birth certificate information from being released?

    Isn’t it interesting that Congress spent time and money investigating and ruling whether John McCain was a “natural born” citizen, but not Obama. There are only three qualifications for the office of President, and we still do not know if President Obama is qualified.

  9. Posted April 25, 2010 at 11:42 pm | Permalink | Reply

    I don’t laugh at the “birther” issue. I take it seriously…however, even on my own blog I have not addressed the issue because I see too many roadblocks for this movement to ever take hold. I hope I’m wrong about that.

    If you can prove Obama isn’t a naturalized citizen, you’ll need to challenge his Presidency in the courts…which is where I see the block. The courts will either A) Protect Obama by dismissing it, or B) Not want to upset our nation and just not hear the case.

    I wish good luck to the birthers, but I just don’t see any progress ever happening beyond the point it is at.


    • Posted April 26, 2010 at 12:02 am | Permalink | Reply

      The court it should be tried in as a criminal court. And it shouldn’t come from citizens begging a chance to be heard; it should come from law enforcement doing their jobs.

      If that’s too much to ask, this country is hurting in ways that no law and no election will ever fix.

      I think we need to stop accepting the politicization of law enforcement and of the courts. If government, media, and law enforcement are too afraid (or corrupt) to do their jobs then what we have is anarchy where outcomes are decided by the mob with the most raw power. Period. We are Anbar Province, 2006.

      I think Arizona has been allowed a glimpse of what that means – looking across the border at beheadings, faces sewn onto soccer balls, and people leaving everything behind when the drug lord says they will die if they stay – and that has given them the courage to do what the whole nation needs to do. If we don’t confront those who break our laws we will be overtaken by them, and at that point what’s written in the laws makes absolutely no difference. A law that is unenforced doesn’t exist, in all practicality.

      It’s time for law enforcement to take the laws seriously, while they still (hopefully) can.

      I appreciate your wellwishes, Scott. I hope there is progress because if there isn’t it means that lawlessness carries the day once again.

      • Posted June 23, 2011 at 8:02 pm | Permalink

        Law Enforcement is thoroughly corrupt. Google began to “personalize” search results, so you may not get the same results I get doing this search, but if you search for cop charged pedophile, you should scroll through 10 pages of search results and still be finding cops of the USA who were recently charged with pedophilia, either molestation or pornography. Beyond that cops are nearly universally on steroids. Did you notice how much more immense cops are than the general population? They’re big as the football players these days. They pick up old men and break their necks throwing them to the ground. Beyond there being roid addict pedophiles, the cops are dealing every manner of illegal drug, doing illegal drugs and protecting drug distribution networks. If you search on youtube for police brutality videos, you’ll find thousands of videos of people being brutally assaulted by cops, that the person did nothing obvious to deserve the beat down they got. Some people are winning judgements against these brutal cops, but now the cops are smashing cell phone cameras and claiming it’s illegal to record them and claiming their vehicle camera’s were not on at the time of their alleged abuses. So, you’re definitely right about the cops not being up to the task of demanding justice, they are as much criminals as the politicians or the judges. I hope you’re not breathing the Fukushima air, there’s been 3 meltdowns going on at Fukushima for nearing 4 months and TEPCO is talking about a 10 year plan to “decommission” the reactors. They should have thrown sand bags on the reactors the first day the meltdown occurred. Instead they didn’t even announce for 3 months that the melt down had occurred in the first week. So, the cops are out there breathing nuclear radiation, thinking iodine is going to save them from hot particles in the lungs, but it’s not. Beyond wearing a gas mask all time spent out doors, you should get some bentonite clay and activated carbon. You can eat powderized activated carbon to get toxins out of your body. You’d probably need a blender to powderize it. You can put it in water. A bit of borax is effective also, to remove nuke radioactive material from people. Food grade hydrogen peroxide will slough off any tissue that’s cancerous. Plus check your PH regularly, you should be about 7 on the PH scale. Avoid veges that have a big surface area like broccoli and cauliflower, at least til you hear the thing has been sand bagged. Animal foods are also very bad as they the animals eat off the tainted ground. It’s probably going to get worse about the time all the cops realize how hard they got screwed over. I’m expecting nuke war in the not very distant future. As I see it the very top guy, the fleshy man god of Earth is trying to murder everybody. Don’t live in a city and if nuke war happens dig in DEEP. Then make a complex of tunnels, join your whole neighborhood underground, brace the overhead. You could also get a boat and sail the seas, that’s my plan if I’m able to get it all together. You would definitely want to seal your boats cabin and filter the air intake at HEPA efficiency. Thanks for your reporting!

  10. DiogenesLamp
    Posted May 8, 2010 at 1:36 am | Permalink | Reply

    We should urge and support our state legislators to pass laws requiring a REAL birth certificate with a signature from a WITNESS TO THE BIRTH, or Obama won’t be allowed to place his name on the ballot.

    If the election boards were doing their jobs properly, they wouldn’t have let him on the ballot in the first place. We have proof positive of the incompetence rampant in 50 states election board offices. We need to fix this problem by getting each state legislature to act.

    • Posted May 8, 2010 at 3:47 am | Permalink | Reply


      All of the talk before the election about the DOH not being able to provide a copy of Obama’s birth certificate except with his permission was shown to be a bunch of crap when somebody (Lt Gov Aiona?) forced the DOH to post the administrative rules as required by law. There we read that the DOH is authorized to give a certified copy of the BC if necessary for a government official to effect a transaction (such as placement of a name on the ballot) on behalf of the person.

      Hawaii law and rules agreed all along with those of us who said there’s got to be a way for government officials to be authorized to see the documentation on people who need to be eligible for a government service. It was right there in the DOH rules – wherever Fukino hid those rules so nobody would know she was lying through her teeth the whole time.

      This whole mess was able to happen because Fukino broke the law by hiding the rules. I wonder what her asking price was.

      • Posted June 8, 2010 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

        Perhaps she did not have an asking price, so much as an offer she couldn’t refuse, from either the U.S. attorneys or thugs listed (or not listed) on AG Eric Holder’s organizational chart.

      • Posted June 9, 2010 at 2:45 am | Permalink

        I once suggested to Janice Okubo that she could get in a witness protection program. It apparently rattled her, because she responded to that e-mail with a response to a totally different request.

        Something is going on – that’s apparent. It’s a shame we have no law enforcement in this country. Sigh.

  11. bruce
    Posted May 22, 2010 at 9:38 pm | Permalink | Reply

    bongo and his band of radical commies have declared war on the american people if you don’t believe me just look at the mob of seiu and acorn thugs attacking people in maryland.these thugs were escorted and protected by thugs from the D.C. seiu police which is why local police would not clear criminals from peoples homes.the cops all sided with bongo and help him steal our liberties cops can not be trusted because they are now the enemies of freedom.

    • Posted May 22, 2010 at 10:23 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I think some cops can be trusted, but as long as we don’t know which ones are which, it’s problematic. They cannot afford to violate the public trust, but what I’ve seen all over with this – and what the public is seeing in a host of areas – is that the people we are supposed to be able to trust ARE violating our trust, and thumbing their noses at us and the law in the process – and legally we can’t seem to do a thing about it because they are the watch-keepers. The foxes guarding the henhouses.

  12. yo
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 3:08 pm | Permalink | Reply

    check this out, butter.

    • Posted June 3, 2010 at 3:27 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Yes, I’ve seen that post. Ladysforest does excellent work. I recommend everyone to see that post. There is more that will be coming out also. Hopefully soon.

  13. Mrs. P
    Posted June 8, 2010 at 10:54 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Tim Adams Chief Elections Clerk exposes Obama Birth Certificate Scandal “Obama was not born in HI”

    Wow!! Could this be the break that we need to get Ovomit out of office?? We can only hope and pray this is not a hoax.

    • Posted June 9, 2010 at 2:42 am | Permalink | Reply

      My computer won’t let me download what is needed for me to watch videos online. Do you know if there’s a write-up of this subject somewhere, or could you summarize for me please? Thanks!

  14. Mrs. P
    Posted June 9, 2010 at 3:23 am | Permalink | Reply

    This is where I found the article


  15. Posted June 9, 2010 at 5:16 pm | Permalink | Reply

    I have not been able to confirm the existence of a Tim Adams as “Chief Elections Officer in 2008.”

    Furthermore, there is no context provided, and no proof offered. Just an anonymous voice on an Internet radio calmly claiming that “everyone knew that Obama was not born in Hawaii and did not have a long-form birth certificate.”

    YEAH, right!

    Color me skeptical. Rather than blindly posting this, which is what liberals do, we should be asking, at a minimum

    “WHERE was Obama born?”

    “WHERE is the proof of his birth?”

    “WHERE is the proof that Tim Adams is legit?”

    Edited as requested by the poster – Nellie

    • Posted June 9, 2010 at 6:07 pm | Permalink | Reply

      We do need to take anonymous claims with a shaker of salt. I can’t view Youtube so I don’t even know exactly what this claim is. I let the comment and link remain so people can check it out if they like, but I haven’t checked it out and make no claims about its accuracy. I think the original poster here was also wondering if there’s any validity to it. If anybody has any information that would help people decide whether they think it’s either valid or a hoax, that would be helpful.

      Edited out housekeeping – Nellie

  16. yo
    Posted June 9, 2010 at 7:15 pm | Permalink | Reply

    citizenwells is reporting that he has found the adams thing to be a fraud.

    On another note, a more obvious note, Obama has made it crystal clear as to why the founders wanted a natural born citizen to be required to hold the office of president.

    The disheartening thing is that 30-40% of the country wants him to be president for exactly the kind of attitudes that the founders were afraid of.

    • Posted June 9, 2010 at 7:41 pm | Permalink | Reply

      It is disheartening, isn’t it? A nation that doesn’t deserve to be free will certainly get what they deserve.

      God, have mercy on us!

  17. yo
    Posted June 10, 2010 at 11:05 am | Permalink | Reply

    Now wnd.com is reporting that the adams story is true. Adams really was an elections officer in hawaii and says it’s an open secret in hawaii that obama was never born there.

  18. Epistemologist
    Posted June 15, 2010 at 2:40 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Interesting discussion by military legal experts on the LTC LAKIN case from a military legal professional forum.


    • Posted June 15, 2010 at 3:27 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Thanks for that link. I’ve got several irons in the fire and had forgotten about that discussion. And I have to remove my browsing history every couple days to hinder interference. As I’ve looked at Article 92, I’m coming to understand the situation much better with Lt Col Lakin, and I’m realizing that the issue is not as complicated as the lawyers try to make it out to be. Here’s what I submitted (we’ll see if it gets posted):

      Looking at http://usmilitary.about.com/od/punitivearticles/a/mcm92.htm , under the explanation for the elements, the element of lawfulness is described this way:

      “(c) A general order or regulation is lawful unless it is contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders or for some other reason is beyond the authority of the official issuing it. See the discussion of lawfulness in paragraph 14c(2)(a).”

      It seems to me that this states directly that an order issued contrary to the Constitution is an unlawful order. The Constitution doesn’t waive the natural born citizenship requirement simply because somebody certifies an election. The Constitution forbids anyone who is not a natural born US citizen from being the Commander-in-Chief. If Obama is not a natural born citizen, then his orders are – as the description mentions – “contrary to the Constitution”.

      The authorization for the use of force against those who perpetrated 9-11 was given to the president. Someone who is not the valid president cannot issue a lawful general order moving our troops into combat operations on foreign soil. Without a valid presidential order, Lakin’s commander has no more authority to deploy him to Afghanistan than he would have to deploy him to Iran at the current time. His orders to Lakin would be – as the description above states – “beyond the authority of the official issuing it.”

      It seems to me that this description makes clear that the constitutionality of an order is not a political issue but a legitimate qualifier for the lawfulness of an order – an issue the military has a duty to resolve. Since the military cannot resolve issues of Constitutionality on their own, they would have to ask the civil courts to decide this – which keeps the military within its boundaries of not deciding the law. If the military refused to refer this to a civil court for a decision the military would be over-stepping their authority by deciding the law on their own.

      To date, all courts have refused to address the issue because they say that nobody has “standing” – that nobody is personally harmed if a usurper is acting as president. All this case would do – if it is handled rightly – is force the civil courts to address the question because – yes – somebody DOES give a damn whether the Constitution is trashed. Without a valid CIC there are no lawful orders for combat operations. All Lakin’s case is intended to do is to force the civil courts to acknowledge that it does INDEED hurt “somebody” if the Constitution is trashed.

      What most folks don’t know is that the HDOH has already confirmed – in 2 different ways through official communications – that the Factcheck COLB is a forgery. They have made a statutory admission that Obama’s birth certificate has been amended (which must be noted on a genuine COLB but isn’t noted on Factcheck) and have confirmed that the certificate numbers were always issued by the state registrar on the “date filed” (making the Factcheck “date filed” incompatible with the Nordyke twins’ certificates, since Obama’s was supposedly given a number 3 days earlier but the number given was 2 later than the Nordyke twins’). Documentation for all this is at https://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/

      Hawaii law says that an amended birth certificate doesn’t qualify as prima facie evidence. HRS 338-17 says that the probative value of a late or amended BC must be determined by an administrative or judicial person or body when presented as evidence. The facts of Obama’s birth CANNOT be determined simply by Nancy Pelosi looking at Obama’s birth certificate (even though the HDOH has confirmed that nobody in the DNC or Hawaii Democratic Party has ever even ASKED to see Obama’s documents) because she is legislative – not administrative or judicial.

      And every judge to date has refused to look at the BC. Obama is – literally – an undocumented worker. According to law he’s not even supposed to be able to receive a federal paycheck until his documentation is verified.

      So we know that anybody who certified Obama’s eligibility (and the only one who even claims to have done that is Nancy Pelosi) absolutely committed perjury in doing so – because the facts of Obama’s birth can only be determined by a judge looking at the BC itself when it is presented as evidence. And we know that has never happened.

  19. yo
    Posted June 21, 2010 at 12:01 am | Permalink | Reply

    Adams has now stated on an abc news affiliate the same things he has stated previously. There is no birth certificate. His superiors told him. He also knows firsthand there is no hospital records.

    When the Doh said in their public statement that they had reviewed the vital records, did they say that there was a birth certificate?

    I always thought that there was a birth certificate that had damaging information. I’m flabbergasted. There is a good possibility that there is no birth certificate at all!

    • Posted June 21, 2010 at 12:30 am | Permalink | Reply

      For sure there’s no hospital birth certificate. If what I suspect is true, he has a late birth certificate that was only completed in 2006. That would mean that the EVVE System would have a void flag on his record so that if anybody did a basic check on him it would come back saying they don’t have a valid BC for him – because what he’s got is not sufficient for prima facie evidence. Fukino has said that they have looked at the original birth certificate. She’s also indicated that there is more than one document which makes up Obama’s birth record. My guess is that the “original birth certificate” is a late birth certificate that has no doctor’s signature at all – based entirely on the testimony of Madelyn Dunham, with the necessary medical information finally provided in 2006 by a page in Obama’s medical file, from Obama’s Chicago doctor (with the information originally coming from the Kenyan BC, but that wouldn’t be noted in the medical file in Chicago).

  20. tdr
    Posted June 22, 2010 at 9:25 pm | Permalink | Reply

    but you do believe he had a colb of some sort correct? different of course from the one online. i dont know how to tell you how much you are doing for this country and how you will probably not receive any recognition for the work you do. but when this thing finally breaks those of us who have been following it will know how it came about. thanks.

    • Posted June 22, 2010 at 9:51 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I believe he has a birth certificate now. I believe he would not show up in a verification database as having one though, because the one he’s got is not sufficient for prima facie evidence.

      If I can give my kids any kind of future, that’s all the reward I could ever ask for. The people who are willing to be visible in real life deserve any credit they get because that visibility comes with a price in one’s real life. Stephen Pidgeon knows about that, as do the other people leading the legal battles. Lt Col Lakin. We all have a vital role, including the people who spread around the information that we know (especially since we can’t count on any national media telling the truth about this subject). Lord willing, with our united efforts we can get our country back! =)

  21. yo
    Posted June 24, 2010 at 2:33 pm | Permalink | Reply

    More Tim Adams stuff here:

    I’ve come to the conclusion that with a senior elections clerk from Hawaii saying these things, and with Obama using a ssn that has all the earmarks of fraud, and nobody will even talk about it, much less investigate, that we are approaching the end times. The great falling away before the tribulation.

    Is there a more reasonable explanation?

    • Posted June 24, 2010 at 11:06 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I know of no more reasonable explanation than that.

      I continually have to remind myself that what is right will win. The liars and crooks who gloat and prance now will one day bow. We’re studying Revelation in Bible class at church and the one part that jumps right out at me – especially since dealing with this corruption – is the part where it talks about Satan being given power to conquer the saints. The line that stands out is this: This calls for patient endurance on the part of the saints.

      That’s got to be the understatement of the century.

      I’m not always so patient, but as long as the Lord gives me strength I will endure. The outcomes are in God’s hands. If it’s time for this world to end, it will end – and it will be for the best that it ends. Since I don’t know what time it is I’ll keep playing as though there’s still some time, but I can’t help but feel an urgency because things are moving so fast and all the foundations besides the Lord seem to be shaking and falling.

      The treachery goes deeper than anything I’ve revealed here yet. Just today I uncovered a federal agency falsifying their records. Seems very, very likely that they knew to do it because they’ve been monitoring my communications on blogs and e-mail. They know I’m on the right track. They know I know what could reveal Obama’s crimes. The question is whether they will go so far as to destroy all the documents which would prove it. Unless they’re lying they’ve already destroyed 3 documents which would prove it and hidden in Hawaii another.

      Another Hawaii employee let slip something that speaks deeply to the treachery and who is really calling the shots in Hawaii. Taxpayer money can buy anything.

  22. yo
    Posted June 25, 2010 at 3:45 pm | Permalink | Reply

    I see yet another analogy to the bible in all this.

    The religious Jews pre-Christ thought that Moses law could save them. It couldn’t. All it did was provide a way for the high priests of the law to confirm what they themselves did and to condemn what the common man did. Without the changed heart Jesus provides, it did nothing but highlight their sin. But, that law was used by the priests to obtain power and money.

    Now, we have another group of high priests. The secular bunch that are high priests over the law and the constitution. That law can’t save us either. It will just be used as a battering ram to get what the secular high priests want, just like the religious Jews did two thousand years ago.

    When Obama was running for the US senate, his opponent had sealed court divorce records. A newspaper sued, and the records were unsealed because of the ‘peoples right to know’ in something as important as an election. Well, the state of hawaii birth records also have a provision that says that there is an exception for the peoples right to know (like in and election) We didn’t get to use it did we? The high priests are using the law like a battering ram to get what they want and to deny us what is right.
    It’s history all over again.

    We can’t be saved by the law. It will only be used by the high priests of the secular law to accomplish their agenda. Only when the hearts of enough people are changed will anything happen. And that’s where we get into the great falling away talked of in the bible before the tribulation, which by the way happened before the change of every dispensation in the bible. The peoples hearts look to be turning away from righteousness right now. Everyone wants money and power and they don’t care whether it comes from the rich or from borrowing China. Just ‘show me the money!’


    • Posted June 25, 2010 at 7:13 pm | Permalink | Reply

      That would explain what we’re seeing.

      I do think there are people who had no idea of the lawlessness they were inviting into the leadership of their country, or what it would mean. I think there’s some buyer’s remorse. Whether it’s enough, or soon enough to still be effective in rooting out the lawlessness, I don’t know. I’ll keep plugging away but ultimately it depends on how late in the game we already are.

  23. thinkwell
    Posted June 25, 2010 at 10:02 pm | Permalink | Reply


    If you would like legal help from SP (letters, whatever) I can always contact him again in person if need be and am willing to pick up the costs of several hours of his services.

    Haven’t heard from him since the last in person meeting (never got any feedback on the letters). At that time he asked, “what specifically would you like me to do?” My answer was to read the letters with an eye to any possibilities of useful legal action. If have some specific legal action that could possibly be of help, I am willing to bring it to him.

    May you fully succeed in your righteous work.

    • Posted June 26, 2010 at 2:43 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Did you receive an e-mail from me that I sent last night from my daughter’s computer? It’s very important.

      Does WordPress send notifications of new posts? If so, does a person have to subscribe for that? Maybe it would be good for you to subscribe to a particular thread so I can always contact you without using my e-mail (which, BTW, I now know is absolutely being monitored) and you will immediately know that I’m trying to contact you. The more we can neuter their interference in our communication, the better.

  24. tdr
    Posted June 26, 2010 at 12:50 pm | Permalink | Reply

    this probably is a good visual of eveything you were reporting from what i understand from your postings.

    what can i say? i really never thought everyone would be this complicit but then again i know hawaii wants its sovereignty and although i cant find it right now i did read that the house passed a bill giving native hawaii’s sovereignty. the question is does this also mean immunity? its the only reason i can think of for these really blatant acts of refusal to comply with statutes.

    • Posted June 26, 2010 at 1:40 pm | Permalink | Reply

      For the last several months my computer won’t let me download what I need to be able to watch Youtube. We’ve tried everything.

      I think we’re seeing the effects of sticks and carrots. Obama doesn’t know how to use sticks and carrots with people like Iran – possibly because (as he told the Egyptian ambassador) he is a Muslim who supports the Muslim agenda. But he sure knows how to use sticks and carrots on his own people. His lawyers scared the living daylights out of all the media heads by threatening to revoke their FCC license if they reported on Obama’s eligibility problem. I think the folks in Hawaii have probably received similar communications. That’s the stick.

      The carrots is another story. UIPA allows an agency to disobey Hawaii disclosure laws if obeying them will jeopardize federal funding. Three weeks after Leo Donofrio put up his first post saying that Terri K has proof that Obama’s BC is amended, Obama issued an executive order to give federal aid to Native Hawaiians and Pacific-Islanders. That’s been the pet project of Fukino forever – to help Native Hawaiians. Executive orders would absolutely be overturned if Obama was found to be ineligible. Thus, disclosing anything that would expose Obama’s ineligibility would jeopardize federal funding. Obama made that funding absolutely dependent on his own status as president.

      I want to find out when that provision was added to UIPA.

      Given some recent developments I am almost positive that this is the legal rationale that the Hawaii agencies are leaning on to cover their backsides legally. Only thing is, though that provision may (in a very crooked, perverted way) allow them to break their own disclosure laws, it doesn’t change the fact that if they know of a felony and don’t report it to law enforcement they commit misprision of felony. They know that Obama has both forged and perjured himself, and that Pelosi has perjured herself. And it doesn’t allow them to LIE about records not existing or ILLEGALLY DESTROY permanent records.

      So at this point they are totally relying on the fact that nobody in this corrupt government will ever investigate. If we can get the republicans to take the House and convince Darrel Issa that the pervasive filth and lawlessness which put Obama in office needs to be investigated, we may have a chance. Of course, by then what he will find out is that all the evidence in Hawaii and elsewhere has been destroyed. But there’s still evidence right here.

      • tdr
        Posted June 26, 2010 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

        i have always believed they will fall from within. they cannot control everyone nor can they eliminate everyone. maybe what we are seeing here is pure evil thinking they can control what they believe to be the ignorant. the progressive goal of dumbing down america through political correctness and rewriting history may have been a failure. it is possible that there is a groundswell of people who now know they are not alone and that despite all the attempts at controlling our minds, people inherently know when something is not right. it is part of our psyche.

        the problem with the eligibility issue is it will expose the whole cabal. these guys have a great thing going in dc. total control freaks with unlimited power and unlimited funds. i keep wondering what the quid pro quo is for this cover-up. it must be good for every elected official to make an idiot out of themselves and worse.

      • Posted June 26, 2010 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

        It is a cabal, as you say, and I hope there is a groundswell of people who realize we’re not just talking about a tiny technical detail about one person. We’re talking about a whole system that is rotten to the core. There are some who simply refuse to see it; they’re beyond help. But I’m hopeful that more and more people are waking up. The people we have to wake up at this point are the people in government who are high enough to do something but low enough that they still care what the people know and think. I think the state level is probably where we need to focus. Governors who order their state AG to investigate, for instance.

  25. tdr
    Posted June 26, 2010 at 12:59 pm | Permalink | Reply

    bd and yo’

    i know that many think that this is the biggest crime in history yet if you study real history, not recorded, this level of corruption has always existed. for at least the past hundred years those progressive leaders like fdr would do anything to eliminate our freedom as sovereign people. and they did many things to ensure there power. everyone talks about the MSM yet these news organizations have always been in the tank for their progressives. only now with the internet can we know and communicate without a filter and yes there is alot of misinformation out there but there is alot of truth. you might see these times as the most exciting times in history where every person can collectively fight corruption.

    • Posted June 26, 2010 at 1:59 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I actually do feel that it’s an exciting time because of that. I had given up on this issue when Obama was inaugurated, realizing that nobody in the republican party had the gumption to do anything about it. When Donofrio posted about the work Terri K had done it was liberating. Finally, there was something I could do, if only to find out for myself whether Hawaii actually has proof of a Hawaii birth.

      I think right now we are seeing the fastest, most blatant unconstitutional takeover of power that America has ever faced. The separation of powers is totally gone, with Obama claiming executive power to do everything he wants. Right now he’s “deciding” whether he can declare all illegals suddenly legal – this after ICE has already said they won’t enforce the law when
      Arizona refers illegals to them. The checks and balances are totally gone because Obama is ruling by czars who are not approved by Congress. We’ve seen the takeover of banking, General Motors, and healthcare – and the energy industry, internet and other free speech, amnesty for anybody who walks over our non-existent border (as a bribe for a vote for the D’s), and cap and trade to destroy private-sector industry are close on their heels. And in the meantime we are giving up on a missile defense shield for Europe, allowing Iran to get nukes, promoting terrorists within our military, destroying our own nukes, and selling all our allies down the river.

      And all this while the media actively forges documents and lies about everything, the courts insist that nobody has “standing” to hold government accountable for crimes the government has committed, and everybody in law enforcement refuses to enforce the laws – OPENLY and DEFIANTLY refuses to enforce laws even.

      It’s definitely an exciting time, but Obama and Co are doing everything in their power to make it so that even if we CAN get information after he gets to decide which blogs get shut down, we can’t counter the vote of the illegals and we can’t enforce laws even if we can get them passed. He’s definitely going after the foundations of this nation. Unless we get some people in law enforcement who are earnest about their role in keeping America free, Obama’s coup will be complete before we can ever do anything about it – short of open revolution, which would be an excuse for him to institute martial law.

  26. tdr
    Posted June 26, 2010 at 9:23 pm | Permalink | Reply

    did you get my last comment in moderation?

  27. yo
    Posted June 28, 2010 at 11:50 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Got this:
    “There is a small textural difference between COLBs issued to those who were born in hospitals with full documentation and those who were given Hawaiian birth status through an affidavit process:

    And be sure to see this documented evidence that AKA Obama’s COLB is different than other COLBs
    AKA Obama COLB Filed But Never Accepted”

    from an article here:

    Did we ever get that nailed down for sure that filed vs accepted is as this guy has stated in the quote above?

    • Posted June 30, 2010 at 3:36 am | Permalink | Reply

      The most we were able to get from the HDOH regarding “filed” and “accepted” was Okubo’s statement that the terms were all eventually rolled together into the term “filed”. It doesn’t necessarily match the Rules of Practice and Procedure, which define “date filed” as the date that something is physically received in the office. And they refused to clarify any of their procedures regarding their different indices (pending, no records, Hawaiian BC, delayed BC) or how they let anybody know which index their index data is from, what notations would be on those BC’s (which are presumably “filed” somewhere), etc.

      So they claim there is no difference in the terminology at this point, with the implication being that anything they receive in their office is accepted (given a number). But the “For Office Use” portion of their BC request form shows that isn’t necessarily so. They aren’t required to answer questions, although they are required to explain the terminology on their forms. Like everything else that is required of them, however, they simply refuse to do it and that’s the end of it. So that’s where we’re at on that.

  28. yo
    Posted June 30, 2010 at 6:58 pm | Permalink | Reply

    The haw dept of homelands changed their requirement of needing a long form birth cert to prove citizenship—–after it became an issue for obama.

    The haw doh changed certification of live birth to certificate of live birth—–after it became an issue for obama.

    And now they tell us that they merged filed and accepted——-and since we don’t know exactly when, it’s probably a safe assumption that they started doing it after people noticed that obama’s wasn’t accepted.

    Is there anything these people won’t do to protect him?

    • Posted July 5, 2010 at 11:00 pm | Permalink | Reply

      If there’s anything they won’t do I haven’t found it yet.

      • satindolz
        Posted August 27, 2010 at 1:06 am | Permalink

        Hello everyone. I’m usually on Free Republic as Satin Doll, and used to be on Texasdarlin as emcruchon, so some of you may already be familiar with my cant.

        About the lawlessness: this is so typical of the government when they’re trying to hide infomation. In the case of Obama I suspect the Republicans during the Reagan Administration made a grave error in using Obama and his mama on CIA Ops. That is why his records are so hosed.

        Look at Indonesia. He supposedly left there at age 10. So why should the Democrats send someone to buy up all the available photographs and pay bribes to repress all records pertaining to the Soetoros? Well, obviously the secret of Obama lies in Indonesia, that’s why.

        The Republicans are cooperating as they are protecting someone powerful. So who is it? My guess is below.

        Here’s a clue: Obama worked for the CIA in Afghanistatn, 1981 to 1983 (how else do you think a person born in Kenya could get U.S. citizenship? It was a reward for being a spook). Who in the White House during 1981 – 1983 was the CIA Wizard?

        Then Vice President George H.W. Bush, who had been Director of the CIA during President Gerald Ford’s administration. Bush Senior is the guy who gave us the infamous “weaponss for hostages”, remember? And he has sons who, like their brother George Dubya, want to live in the White House.

        Obama must have something powerfully destructive secrets-wise to keep those guys at bay!

  29. Larry
    Posted July 3, 2010 at 10:46 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Dear BDZ,

    Just got back from the grocery store.
    It seems to me this is as close to the MSM as the eligibility issue has come:

    Front cover of the new Globe magazine:


    “Obama Presidency Illegal!

    It’s illegal for Barack Obama to serve as America’s President! That’s what critics are saying after a government records official revealed Obama was NOT born in the U.S. and there is NO birth certificate in Hawaii to prove his claims that’s he’s a “natural born” citizen as required by the Constitution! Find out all the explosive details – only in GLOBE!”

    They call the online COLB a forgery!

    The supermarket tabloids did very well with the John Edwards and Al Gore scandals. Let’s hope this moves things further, too.

    Best wishes.

    • Posted July 5, 2010 at 10:59 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Pretty sad when the Glober and National Enquirer have more journalistic integrity than the entire rest of the media put together.

      Maybe any global warming we’re having here is because Hell is freezing over. lol.

  30. jd
    Posted July 31, 2010 at 5:21 pm | Permalink | Reply

    This is a really interesting site. I doubt if I can add any information, but I do have a question. I read awhile ago that when Obama was a Senator he travelled to Russia and was detained because of things on his passport. Has anyone ever tried to get information from his passport?

    Also, another blogger Stevex09.wordpress has looked into this a lot.
    And I read that when Obama ran against Alan Keyes in Chicago, Obama said in a debate that his place of birth did not matter as he was not running for president. The only other thing I know is that Nancy Pelosi changed the wording on the paper she signed declaring Obama eligible to run for president.

    • Posted July 31, 2010 at 6:23 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I’ve forgotten his name now, but there was somebody who filed a FOIA request to see the passports of Obama, Ann Dunham, and Lolo Soetoro. Obama’s passport records are confidential because he’s still alive; Dunham’s and Soetoro’s are supposed to be released but the DOJ is delaying action on it.

      At this point Obama’s passport probably has the birth certificate that he used until 2006 (when his Hawaii BC was completed) replaced with the Factcheck forgery. His passport files were breached 3 different times, which required the higher-ups in John Brennan’s company to disable their normal security protocols 3 different times. As you know, Brennan – far from being punished for enabling those breaches – was rewarded with a position as Obama’s Director of National Security.

      There is a chance that Russia still has the original, unaltered passport though. Which would give them great bartering power to push for stuff like….. America’s nuclear disarmament…… the US overlooking Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities…

      That is why it is truly a national security risk for the United States to have a crook in office. Whoever owns his secrets owns the entire USA. Look at who contols Obama’s puppet-strings and you probably know who has custody of his real story. Right now Kenya, Hawaii, the Islamists, and Russia come immediately to mind.

      I tried to access the tape of the debate in which Obama allegedly said that but was not able to get to it. Others have said they listened and it was not on there. So either he didn’t say it or the tape has since been cleaned up, just like much on the internet has disappeared or been “cleaned”. Hard to tell which is the case.

      Eventually I’ll probably post on it here, when some other things quiet down, but Pelosi signed a different certification for Hawaii because the Hawaii Democratic Party broke with their usual protocol and refused to certify that Obama is Constitutionally eligible – possibly because one of the attorneys the HDP has relied on to represent them in the past is William H Gilardy, Ann Dunham’s lawyer in the Dunham-Soetoro divorce. He has probably seen the birth certificate that Obama used for everything before 2006.

      I’m almost certain that Obama did not have a completed BC in Hawaii until he amended the incomplete BC (that Madelyn Dunham had filed in 1961) by adding the missing medical information. Since Hawaii had no completed record for him until 2006 he had to use a different BC before then. That is probably why ALL his records have been off-limits; they have the BC he used before 2006, and it was not a US birth certificate.

  31. SapphireSunday
    Posted August 1, 2010 at 9:25 pm | Permalink | Reply

    You probably know this already but the Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro et al passport file has been released., such as it it.

    We can guess now why the DHS and Napolitano’s political appointees were intercepting every FOIA request and then investigating the requestors.

    In any case, SAD did have a passport in 1965, probably before then but they conveniently lost/destroyed/could not find/didn’t look hard enough/deliberately lied about not having the application for the passport that she received in ’65.

    This is all at Mario Apuzzo’s blog. And the documents are at Scribd. Discussed widely on Free Republic.

    There are a few new curiosities. For one, Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) is mentioned on the passport renewal application, but then the name is crossed out. It’s unclear whether she wanted to include him or exclude him from her new passport and changed her mind, or what. Ditto for what (Soebarkah) means.

    SAD was also confused about where and when she got married to Lolo Soetoro. It was either Molokai on 3/15/65 on Maui on 3/5/64. (Or maybe it was the butler in the library with a penknife.) Seriously, somebody suggested that her marriage to Obama wasn’t yet dissolved by 3/5/64, which might explain her being “confused” about the date. Was she a bigamist, too?

    There’s also an interesting page where she swears her correct and true name is Stanley Ann Soetoro and that she’s not known by any other name except Stanley Ann Dunham and that she’s shown on U of Hawaii records as Stanley Ann Dunham. What happened to Anna Obama? And then she goes on to sign that sworn statement as S. Ann Soetoro. And she can’t spell indefinite, which is interesting, given she’s supposed to be a genius, just like her son.

    While everyone is focused on SAD’s passport files, they’ve also released nearly 100 pages of Lolo Soetoro’s dealings with the immigration agency. There is a trove of interesting and (of course) contradictory stuff in there. It’s been redacted in some places. My guess is that one redaction is little Abdallah Soebarkah’s bc.

    These papers will keep people like Dr. Polland busy, because even I spotted a 3-page letter from Lolo to the government where he inexplicably used two different typewriters. One for the first and last page and a different one (or a different font) for the second page. If he was using an IBM Selectric, he’d have to change the ball to accomplish that trick!

    There’s also a letter that’s duplicated in the file (or seems to be at first glance) YET there’s a glaring typo on one copy that doesn’t seem to exist on the other.

    Interesting exchanges concerning whether or not Lolo and S. Ann were fibbing to the government about her alleged very serious stomach problem that might require surgery and also about how her mental and physical health would suffer if she had to be separated from Lolo for any length of time. (Poor baby.)

    There was a long delay between when these papers were requested and when they were released. Cynical persons might suspect somebody trotted out an old typewriter and went to work, especially because there are numerous references to Lolo’s wife’s “5- (or 6-) year-old, AMERICAN CITIZEN son from a previous marriage.” SO convenient, huh?

    The agency that released the documents suggests that SAD’s earlier passport applications might have been purged in the 1980s. As with the Hawaiian DoH, their own retention rules require the documents to be saved–in the case of passport records for 100 years or more.

    In any case, someone at Free Republic has said that these papers are microfilmed before being destroyed, with the films sent to the National Archives, so Mr. Strunk needs to request those same docs from the National Archives.

    With luck, we’ll see them eventually, unless Sandy Berger sneaks them out inside his thong underwear and destroys them. Stranger things have happened.

  32. SapphireSunday
    Posted August 1, 2010 at 9:29 pm | Permalink | Reply

    “such as it is,” I meant. Sorry for MY typos! 🙂 And I meant Molokai OR Maui. Sheesh! I proofread but I don’t see.

  33. PatriotSmiles
    Posted September 28, 2010 at 2:33 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Hello from Nebraska! **Thank you for all your efforts, Butter!
    God Bless You!

    • Posted October 15, 2010 at 4:42 am | Permalink | Reply

      Thank you. Are you ready for the Texas game? Gonna wear red? =)

      Sorry for the delay posting this. I searched my inbox and see that I didn’t receive a notification of this. I wonder how many others I haven’t received notifications for. There’s a virus on my computer that’s been doing all kinds of crazy stuff but this is the first I’ve realized it (apparently) is swallowing my notifications.

  34. jayhg
    Posted September 30, 2010 at 12:00 am | Permalink | Reply

    Lady, you are good and crazy.

    • Posted October 15, 2010 at 4:43 am | Permalink | Reply

      Well, as long as I’m good I guess I can live with crazy. lol. As long as my family tolerates it. =)

      • Jayhg
        Posted March 21, 2011 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

        No, you are good and crazy…..and I feel sorry for you because folks here and on free republic are patting you on the head like they do when they are scared to upset crazy folks!!

      • Posted March 21, 2011 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

        lol. You’re funny.

      • Jayhg
        Posted March 23, 2011 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

        Not as funny as you, only you don’t know how funny you are…..you actually take yourself seriously.

  35. Gianni
    Posted October 15, 2010 at 12:40 am | Permalink | Reply

    Reflecting on some of the information coming out of the Strunk FOIA requests of Ann Dunham’s passport records, I have arrived at the following position.

    I now believe that Obama might very well have been born in Hawaii, although some still argue there could be some complications with his NBC status as a result of his non-citizen father. I’ll allow others to follow that angle.

    But look, it is clear from the Strunk requests that Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro through the Dunham marriage, and that Obama acquired Indonesian citizenship. This is clear from Obama being referred to as Soebarkah and also his name being struck out on one of the passport forms, indicating his citizenship status had changed.

    Now this is where things get good. I believe Obama may have travelled back to the United States with an Indonesian passport, and even further, he may have applied for and received foreign student aid while attending American universities. I believe this is THE reason why Obama is sitting on his records. The embarrassment of having to explain away Indonesian citizenship on his college records–even if he did not lose his American citizenship as a result of his adoption–drove Obama to engage in high levels of obfuscation and deception with regard to his hidden records. Also, it is clear this is also why he has not released his long-form birth certificate. It is not necessarily because it would show Kenyan birthplace. Rather, it would show an amended birth certificate which would have been necessitated because of his adoption and acquisition of Indonesian citizenship.

    It is obvious that this information would have been damning had Obama made it public before and while he was running for the Democratic nomination and then the presidency. It would have painted Obama as even more exotic than he let on in his carefully crafted autobiographies. Obama applied major glosses to his life story, and he was not forthcoming about what really happened as a result of his time living in Indonesia. This sort of deception is unbecoming of anyone aspiring to the highest office in the land. Nothing Obama says can be trusted. He should have been forthcoming from the beginning and let the chips fall where they may.

    • Posted October 15, 2010 at 4:57 am | Permalink | Reply

      The other day I was listening to an interview that Doug Hagmann had with Laurie Roth a long time ago. Took notes and paid close attention to the subjects that Hagmann says were “blacklisted” – that the media was not allowed to mention, on pain of having the media company dissolved via diversity and/or anti-monopoly investigations. Some of the subjects that were blacklisted were the name Barry Soetoro, any oath of loyalty, and the Indonesian schooling. Makes me think there’s something in all that which is incriminating, as you say.

      The adoption wouldn’t pose a problem for Obama though, because after an adoption a new (supplemental) birth certificate is issued and the original is sealed. It doesn’t count as an amendment and there’s no way to necessarily tell it’s from an adoption. And Hawaii allows unadoption; if a person is unadopted they restore the original birth certificate and seal up the supplemental BC.

      So whatever amendment was made was something besides the adoption.

      But all of this stuff really needs to be sorted out in a legal investigation if for no other reason than the lies and the rules and laws broken all down the line.

  36. Posted October 17, 2010 at 7:42 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Tips on writing an FOIA request (missing tips 6, 11, 14, and 15):














    • Posted November 10, 2010 at 5:57 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Sigh. Apparently this is another post that I didn’t get a notification for. I wish I knew exactly what or who was eating my e-mails.

      Anyway, sorry this is late to be approved. I was here to approve another one and that’s the only reason I saw that this was awaiting moderation.

      Thank you for the links. Those look like they could be very helpful. And I can use all the help I can get! =)

  37. Your NameMary L.McGee
    Posted November 9, 2010 at 5:39 am | Permalink | Reply

    I was born on july 18, 1944, at Kapiolani Maternity Hospital. I have an original birth certificate. It is black with white writing and lists the time of birth, the doctor’s name and all other vital info…..I also have a small grn card, laminated, which shows I was born in Hawaii, just like the one that has been produced concerning Obama…..Where is the black bc for him, like mine? I went to Punahou School and graduated 1962. Obama graduated Punahou School 1978. The small grn laminated card was a duplicate for me to use as ID…..it was not the original, like I have, with the embossed seal, which I have used all these years for jobs,etc. I just recently sent this original birth certificate to obtain a special visa to travel to Mexico on a cruise ship.I have wondered about all this trouble over Obama’s bc for over a year now. what’s going on?

    • Posted November 10, 2010 at 6:28 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Mary, that’s a good question. The laws don’t require Obama himself to disclose his long-form but at this point the laws DO require the Department of Health to disclose it, because Fukino made a public announcement about it. The Hawaii DOH has been breaking laws and rules right and left to cover for Obama, and that is one of the biggest concerns here. If the HDOH was following the rules and laws this would have all been over a long time ago.

      As it is, if we take the HDOH at their word, we know that the Factcheck COLB Obama posted is a forgery, that Obama’s genuine BC is amended and thus is not legally valid, and that permanent records have been destroyed (1961 birth index, index to foreign births, at least one individual birth certificate other than Obama’s, etc).

      In addition, we know that administrative rules which are required by law to be on the HDOH website at all times were kept hidden from the public until November of 2009, the HDOH is SAYING they won’t disclose long-form BC’s to registrants even though their law and rules require them to and they actually do release those, the HDOH is treating Obama’s records differently than other records, and the HDOH is refusing to follow their Administrative Rules which allow non-certified abbreviated certificates to be disclosed to anybody who asks for them.

      Something is definitely fishy with Obama’s records but even if there was nothing fishy with them, there is something very, very rotten at the Hawaii Department of Health. They definitely don’t want anybody checking it out either; their initial request for the “Vexatious Requestor” Bill would have punished people who make too many requests and who report their potential unethical or criminal behavior. That bill would have gutted their open records law. That’s how far they are willing to go in order to keep people from being able to investigate them.

      And that is what I’ve been doing, and what is my major focus. This really isn’t about Obama; it’s about the rule of law, which the HDOH and almost every other government agency involved in Obama’s eligibility issue are openly defying:

      1. Obama has multiple social security numbers and the one he uses most frequently is from CT, where he has never lived.

      2. The Selective Service Administration perpetrated a forged registration for Obama.

      3. Somebody at John Brennan’s company disabled the protocols at the Department of State so that Obama’s passport file could be breached 3 times; insiders have said it was to “clean up” Obama’s files, and the guy who was in charge of the investigation about the breach – Joe Biden – became Obama’s running-mate even though Obama himself and his wife both obviously despise the guy and his gaffes.

      4. Routine checks that a law enforcement officer might do have been disabled for Obama’s records, as evidenced by the policemen who tried to check Obama’s records, were locked out of them, and got in trouble for having even tried.

      5. The Hawaii DOH is breaking every law in the books to cover for Obama.

      6. Alex Galovich and Bowen (the attorney) at The Passport Office very much appear to have perjured themselves by submitting to a judge what is a forged “cable” from the State Department, in an effort to explain why they haven’t released some of the passport applications for Obama’s mother – the ones that would pertain to where she could have been in 1961. They’ve also failed to produce the index cards for her passports in over a year’s time, when it would be a simple check of alphabetized microfilmed records.

      So it’s a mess, and what’s even more troubling than anything that might end up being true about Obama is what we already know is true about the government agencies: they have been lying and breaking laws. They spit on the rule of law and on the citizens of this country who expect the rule of law to be obeyed. That is why this issue is so serious.

  38. drkate
    Posted January 3, 2011 at 3:57 am | Permalink | Reply

    Spot on, excellent essay. It is that the law is not being enforced, by all branches of government! Thank you for your great work.

  39. Lawrence G
    Posted January 8, 2011 at 1:27 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Darrell Issa is head of the Project On Government Oversight. Ever tried contacting him?

    • Posted February 4, 2011 at 3:44 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Wow. This was posted on Jan 8th and I never received a notification. Sorry about that delay. My e-mail sometimes disappears before my very eyes.

      I did contact Issa, faxed some critical information to him and called to make sure that he would be given what I sent. So he knows. Whether he does anything about it may depend on whether we can convince him and other Beltway folks that this issue is not poison to them because most people now know there is something drastically wrong – especially after HI Gov Neil Abercrombie told Mike Evans that his people had gone into Kapiolani and Queens Hospitals with search warrants and had not found a birth certificate for Obama in either place. I’ve got the link to the audio of Mike Evans saying that, as well as the transcript of the conversation, posted now. You can find it by clicking on “February 2011” on the right sidebar.

      The media wants Abercrombie’s latest bumbling to go down the memory hole, but a lot of people had their eyes opened up by both what Abercrombie said AND by the fact that Mike Evans changed his tune the next day to say he hadn’t spoken to Abercrombie at all when audio recordings all over the country document that he indeed said he spoke directly to Abercrombie.

      Also disturbing is the fact that Abercrombie shortly afterwards asked his DOH Director (Neal Palafox) to resign, lied about it, and then was caught lying – all while the threat of an ethics violation investigation was held over the director’s head even as he hadn’t been told anything about it and the AG wouldn’t say whether an investigation was underway or imminent or not. The whole thing smacks of the Chicago way – where honest players suddenly urgently change their tune, resign amid threats of investigation, etc.

      So people are waking up, in spite of a complicit media. The DC folks need to figure out that the American people are not blind, even though a certain class of people believes whatever the corrupt media feeds them.

  40. PatriotSmiles
    Posted February 4, 2011 at 3:12 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Great news in our state of Nebraska that State Senator Mark Christensen introduced an eligibility bill! Tick Tock on barkey!

    • Posted February 4, 2011 at 3:52 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Yes! Now we need to start the hard work of convincing the committee members that this is an important bill and should passed on to the full legislature.

      We will probably have to fight the media though. They are in full-out disinformation mode. An article at http://www.svherald.com/content/news/2011/01/29/state-lawmakers-want-obama-s-birth-records regarding the Arizona bill contains the claim that Hawaii officials released Obama’s COLB. I alerted them to that factual error, explaining that it totally changes the whole story and obscures why an eligibility bill is needed, while impugning those of us who know the real story and why a bill is necessary. I requested a correction on the same day that the article was posted – on Jan 30th. Five days and another reminder later, they still have done nothing to correct it.

      That is willful lying, similar to what happened over the EXACT SAME factual inaccuracy from The Hutch News back before the election. People really need to be made aware that the media is willfully lying to them about the facts.

  41. PatriotSmiles
    Posted February 4, 2011 at 4:21 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Thank you for the link to the AZ Herald, I sent an email to their correction department, stating the need for a printed correction on the story~admittedly not as good a writer as you, LOL.

    I also contacted my State Senator, and Senator Christensen, our AG Bruning and Gov Heineman, plus about 10 other State Senators.
    Hope we can get some traction on this legislation!
    Thank you for all of your efforts and hard work!!

  42. PatriotSmiles
    Posted February 4, 2011 at 4:52 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Just got an email response back from AZ Herald, said they will handle the correction “shortly”….hope it happens!

    Hey~ GREAT WORK on FR, hope DRC or someone capable will assist you in formatting. I am a bit Amish in this area, or I would step up!
    But will try to help where I can! :}

    • Posted February 4, 2011 at 5:38 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Was it from Steven Byerly, and did it say, “Thank you for your correction. Our editorial team will handle the issue

      If so, I think it’s an auto response, which I got on Jan 30th. I replied to that e-mail by reminding them that it hadn’t been corrected yet and asking them to let me know how they intended to correct it. Crickets.

  43. PatriotSmiles
    Posted February 4, 2011 at 6:58 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Yes, exactly…you are spot on! Oh, I had my hopes set too high.
    I will follow up, but it appears ignoring will make it all go away in their minds…?? What a shame!! :{

  44. PatriotSmiles
    Posted February 4, 2011 at 9:09 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Juat contacted all members of Veterns Affairs Committee on Senator Christensen’s legislation, hope it helps!

  45. PatriotSmiles
    Posted February 4, 2011 at 9:10 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Juat~Just I must need some hot green tea, LOL!

    • Posted February 4, 2011 at 9:22 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I hope Juat contacts them too. The more the merrier. lol

      Hot green tea sounds good. Reminds me I better get started doing a BUNCH of baking for an event I said I would donate a bunch of stuff for. First pick up kids from school and then get my rear in gear so it’s all ready by tomorrow morning.

      Enjoy your tea! =)

  46. PatriotSmiles
    Posted February 5, 2011 at 12:49 am | Permalink | Reply

    Thank U so much for ALL of your awesome contributions on this front~ you have made superb strides in the quest for TRUTH about this mysterious person who is supposed to be our “Commander-In -Chief”.
    I hope you feel everyone’s gratitude for all you have exposed on this usurper! The green tea was GREAT…go antioxidants!!

    I hope Nebraska can foil barky’s plans for 2012!

  47. Posted February 5, 2011 at 2:45 am | Permalink | Reply

    If you want to bring this to a head, get me on any TV news show: Fox or MSNBC, I don’t care. I will show them, in real time, and on live TV, how Factcheck.org forged Obama’s Certification of Live Birth

    • Posted February 5, 2011 at 3:34 am | Permalink | Reply

      I wish I could. I really wish I could get you on any of those shows.

      • Jayhg
        Posted March 22, 2011 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

        butterdezillion, you can’t get anyone on ANYTHING. You have an amazingly heightened sense of your own importance – as you you and you alone have the REAL info about President Obama and jsut can’t get anyone to listen to you. That’s cause those voices in your head are lying to you, lady. Get back on your medication. Do it for your family.

    • Jayhg
      Posted March 22, 2011 at 8:28 pm | Permalink | Reply

      No you won’t. You’re already thought to be a nutcase. Don’t you realize that if there was any chance of you actually being right, all those news channel would have knocked each other over to get to you and get to you first so they get what they like best, an exclusive?!!”

      Don’t you know that is you ore butterdezillion wack-a-doodle have any REAL proof that you would be all over TV and famous!?? You are being ignored by serious folks because you and butterdezillion are clearly crazy.

    • Jayhg
      Posted March 22, 2011 at 8:31 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Why can’t you get yourself on television? Call up Fox News and tell them that you have the INSIDE REAL STORY on President Obama and his birth certificate. They hate Obama and would love it if you did. What’s the problem with you calling them and getting them to listen to you?

      The answer is that you’re a nut and even Fox won’t touch you with a 10000 ft. pole!

  48. Posted March 6, 2011 at 8:37 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Incredible work.
    Thank you for all your efforts.
    I will repost your information from time to time.
    I re- post as exactly as I can. I hope that you don’t mind. I like to keep all information original. I always post the links where I get them from.
    I just want to get as much truth about this out there.
    Thank you.

    • Posted March 6, 2011 at 9:27 pm | Permalink | Reply

      You’re very welcome.

      And thank you for getting the word out there. That’s exactly what we need. As long as the information is kept accurate anybody is free to use anything that’s here in whatever way you see best. We don’t have the big megaphone of the alphabet networks, but we do have word of mouth, and more and more people are realizing what’s going on.

      We’ll just keep on keepin’ on! =)

  49. tdr
    Posted March 23, 2011 at 1:33 am | Permalink | Reply

    hey bdz,

    great job…right as always.

  50. Charlene
    Posted March 23, 2011 at 2:02 am | Permalink | Reply

    To Jayhg,
    I have 2 questions….
    1. What are you bothering to read her blog for if she is a *wackadoodle?*
    2. Sha HAS and so has Ron provided plenty of proof, what proof do you have to contradict one of her facts?
    Just curious.

    • Jayhg
      Posted March 23, 2011 at 4:48 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I read whatever I want to read. I don’t have to explain anything to you, an anonymous poster on the internet.

      This butterdezillion person IS a wackjob and you people talk to her as if she is actually going to be the one to BRING DOWN THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. It’s patently crazy, but mostly, it’s to be pitied….and when I’m not feeling sorry for how clearly offer her rocker she is, I’m laughing at her absurb constant mantra that Hawaii has said outright, what she calls INDIRECT PROOF or glamorized or something equally crazy that PRESIDENT Obama’s COLB is amended or a forgery. Hawaii has said no such thing, but you can’t tell butterdezillion that. She has deduced all kinds of stuff and given herself all kinds of delusions of grandure.

      Oh well. I will continue to alternately pity her and you guys and be entertained by her…..and you guys patting her on the head and telling her how great she is and then laughing at her behind her back. I guarantee that is what you’re doing.

    • Jayhg
      Posted March 23, 2011 at 4:51 pm | Permalink | Reply

      And furthermore, SHE AND RON WHAT’S HIS NAME DON’T HAVE AN OUNCE OF PROOF OF ANYTHING. They just go around in circles speculating, guessing and hoping and praying and FAILING and still with each failure saying, as crazy people do, this next thing is going to be the big thing that GETS PRESIDENT OBAMA out of office.

      Of course, it’s like chasing a rainbow. You’re always RIGHT THERE, but then when you get up to it, it’s actually far away.

      Here in the United States, if you accuse me of something, YOU HAVE TO PROVE WHAT YOUR ACCUSATION. You don’t get to accuse me, and then I have to prove you are wrong. Innocent until proven guilty, people. If you want President Obama out of office, and you think he is not born in Hawaii, YOU HAVE TO PROVE IT. He doesn’t have to prove he WAS born in Hawaii.

      Damn you birfers are stupid.

  51. Charlene
    Posted March 23, 2011 at 11:42 pm | Permalink | Reply

    You are right Jay, we all pat her on the back and then laugh at her…. WHERE do you get that from? I happenn to respect hher and Ron and ANYONE who has enough brains to see that if BO had nothing to hide he would come out with some papers to prove all who distrust him that we are wrong. Gee, it would not take much. I am not going to get into with you and explain all the very basic reasons the majority of voters question his eligibilty, it is all out there for you to read everywhere.
    What I asked you for is to please give me some reason, other than the liars words, WHY we should believe he is eligible. Can you please explain that to me? To me it makes no sense for a person to believe anything he says, when he fights so hard to hide any answers.
    What did he himself read? something about the only people who hide the truth have something to hide? If nothing else he is the greatest hypocrite in US history. He is causing decent people to disagree and who knows, you and I may never have disagreed on anything. He is (another one of his greatly read words), *devisive* I do not and will not believe him legit until someone like yourself can give me any logical (key word) reason.
    Meanwhile, be nice. We all want our Country, the one it was intended to be.

  52. Jayhg
    Posted March 24, 2011 at 11:23 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Charlene, talk yourself into believing that the “majority” of people question President Obama’s birth. BULLSHIT….but you and wackadoodle butterdezellion go ahead and keep hope alive.

    I don’t have to give you any logical reason or anything else. He has shown his birth certificate when he didn’t have to do that. No other president has and that about McCain is a birther lie.

    Because the President of the United States doesn’t know you or butterdezillion or Ron are alive does not mean that he has something to hide.

    This is the United States and no one, including President Obama, has to prove butter or that nut ron what’s his name or anyone else is wrong. YOU HAVE TO PROVE THAT THE PRESIDENT HAS SHOWN SOMETHING THAT IS FORGED. You don’t get to say “THAT’S FORGED” and then he has to go about proving that it IS NOT forged. The state of Hawaii has said that this is his birth certificate. You are now free to prove that this is not true. You don’t get to say “no it’s not” and then the President of the United States has to pay attention to you and start jumping through hoops for your. HE DOESN’T!!!

    You birthers are the ones who are divisive but mostly, you’re just crazy. President Obama has not hidden anything. He did what ALL PRIOR PRESIDENTS DO once they are elected. They seal the records of the presidency while they are in office. This does not apply to stuff that’s BEFORE he became President. So if you want to see his college records, go to Harvard and ask for them. They will tell you to take your crazy ass home cause you’re, well, crazy, but that’s not President Obama’s fault.

    You have a nerve saying “be nice” when you spouted all kinds of birfer bs here. What’s nice about that?

    Go on and play with that lunatic butterdezillion. She’s is clearly not stable, has no PROOF of anything, just speculation which you guys call proof, and this is evidenced by the fact that President Obama is still in the office of the Presidency of the United States and if any part of what she and or any other birfer said was even remotely true, some one who can actually DO something would have. Haven’t you guys noticed that NOTHING you havd done or said has stuck!!!???? Why do you think that is? IT’S BECAUSE YOU DON’T HAVE ANY PROOF OF ANYTHING, YOU IDIOT! Get some proof if you want ANYONE to listen to you.

    It’s amazing that you birfers act as if you and you alone have got the goods and everyone else from the entire republican party to the latest newborn baby is in on some giant conspiracy to cover for President Obama……

    • Posted March 25, 2011 at 1:46 am | Permalink | Reply

      Summary of what you said: “You’re stupid”.

      It’s getting old. I’ll keep approving your comments but after 50 times of saying “You’re stupid” it just seems a bit juvenile.

      • Jayhg
        Posted March 25, 2011 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

        That’s not a summary of what I said, but it makes sense that this is all you would take away from it.

        You have your mind made up. You deduce, suppose and guess and then callit PROOF. It isn’t, no matter how long and convuluted your posts get.

        So “stupid” is all I got for ya. I like mentally ill, too, cause that fits very well – actually it fits better than stupid because lots people are not intelligent. They are not, however, off the rocker.

  53. charlene
    Posted March 25, 2011 at 2:49 am | Permalink | Reply

    My computer is down,using phone
    At Obama releaseyourrecords there is an article about Ike giving his Bc when the proof was asked for
    Wish I could post it.

  54. bigyaz
    Posted May 5, 2011 at 11:02 pm | Permalink | Reply


    Racist, hateful excuse for an American — and a human being. And you probably call yourself a Christian, too.

    • Posted May 5, 2011 at 11:33 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Again, I will let this stand because it shows the ways people choose to ignore the substance of the intellectual debate – the evidence. Does brown skin have any impact at all on whether there is a seal on this photo? If not, then it is totally irrelevant.

  55. Posted June 23, 2011 at 8:13 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Oh yeah! Before I got reading more of your work and got distracted writing that long comment to you, I actually came here to ask about your post at free republic:

    You said you had an article to post detailing library microfiche being altered. That’s how I found you was searching google for info pertaining to the microfiche being forged in Hawaiian libraries. Can you point me to that article please? I subscribed to this thread so you can reply as a comment here.

    And 1 more thing tap water is widely tainted with nuke debris. So avoid tap water. I wouldn’t even trust bottled water. Get a Zero Water Filter and use the Total Dissolved Solids Meter that comes with it to test your filtered water to make sure there are no contaminants.

    • Posted June 28, 2011 at 1:43 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I haven’t actually yet posted about the microfilms being tampered with, although I believe there is convincing evidence of it. The evidence is held by a combination of other people who shared with me but now seem to be withholding permission for me to use their material. They don’t trust each other or me, so even though the evidence is there it will likely never be presented.

      And even if the evidence was presented clearly, even WND and Canada Free Press are unwilling to publish it, since they wouldn’t publish the article about the stories of how the birth announcement images were acquired being documentably false. Those are the only 2 visible sources who have been willing to touch the eligibility issue at all, so if they won’t touch this then nobody will. Truth be darned.

      Divided we fall. The Obots know that, and lies, deception, and obfuscation will always divide people.

  56. Posted May 29, 2012 at 12:51 am | Permalink | Reply

    Hi Butter:

    Jerome Corsi just posted this request on Facebook [May 28, 2012, 8:49 PM Eastern] Thought you might be able to help. “Does anyone know who was the Registrar of the Hawaii Department of Health Vital Statistics Section in 1995. When exactly did George Tokuyama end as Registrar – I need to know the month and the year — and when did Alvin Onaka begin as Registrar — again month and year. It’s important.
    Jerry Corsi”

  57. darkhorse
    Posted October 6, 2012 at 6:57 pm | Permalink | Reply

    There is a Japanese mafia on that island that has been providing illegal birth certificates to Japanese citizens for years. If you expose the truth about Bari then you will expose the entire Japanese BC machine. Half of the Japs in the islands would become illegal aliens and be subject to prosecution for all kinds of felonies. This has been going on in Washington state, Oregon, and of course, California, for decades…

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: