Category Archives: Uncategorized

Altering History

Altering History

This regime should scare the heck out of everybody.

Advertisements

MCPD Responses Indicate Fuddy Did Not Die

MCPD Responses Indicate Fuddy Did Not Die

Summary: The MCPD claims that they didn’t collect sworn witness statements regarding the N687MA water landing (which resulted in the alleged death of Loretta Fuddy) because HRS 841-3 was not statutorily in effect. If Fuddy’s pulse stopped in the water as claimed, then HRS 841-3 would be in effect for Maui County if she died. If her pulse stopped on land at Kalaupapa then HRS 841-3 would be in effect for Kalawao County if she died. Neither county did the investigation that would have been required by HRS 841-3 if Loretta Fuddy had died. Both counties agreed that if Fuddy had died HRS 841-3 would be in effect for Maui County.

By saying that HRS 841-3 was NOT in effect, the Maui County Police Department confirms that Loretta Fuddy did not die.

Either the Maui County Police Department is lying and refusing to do their statutory duty of collecting sworn witness statements, or Loretta Fuddy did not die as a result of the water landing of N687MA.

FAA Response Indicates that Fuddy Crash and Death Were Faked

FAA Response Indicates that Fuddy Crash and Death Were Faked

Summary: When the FAA told me that records were destroyed within 30 days because the Fuddy crash was a “no-services” accident, they were confirming that there was no airline “accident” – which means that none of the passengers died within 30 days as a result of the crash, and there was no engine failure. Their response further indicates that they knew this to be the case even as they created documents claiming otherwise.

Either the FAA is lying and illegally destroyed records, or what they claim is true.

FAA FOIA Request and Response

FAA FOIA Request 2 and Disclosure Letter

This is my FOIA request and the FAA’s response.

 

As my request notes, this is the 2nd request I sent – the first one, filed 28 days after Dec 11th,  having been divided into 2 parts.

I was not told what parts were going to whom, or that they would be treated as 2 separate requests. Diana Pfiefle told me via email that I had a certain deadline to agree to pay $2,000 because of the recordings I requested. Before that deadline, though, I received a letter from the FAA’s legal people in DC, saying that I had 30 days to appeal the decision to temporarily deny me access. I responded within the 30 days and attached a copy of my appeal in an email to Pfeifle, saying that the snail mail was en route to the DC guy and asking her to forward my appeal so the records I requested would not be destroyed before I could respond (this was before I knew the requirements for the accident package). Pfeifle shortly thereafter told me that my request for everything except the FAA Compliance Report (which I hadn’t even necessarily requested) had been canceled because I hadn’t agreed to fork out the $,2000 (which somehow later became $1,100 because some of the recordings that existed had supposedly been destroyed, though if it being a “no services” accident meant the records could be destroyed, then they should ALL have been destroyed and not just some. I don’t  have access to those emails at the moment, or I would check to see how many hours of recordings they claimed existed initially that they claim DON’T exist now).

Incidentally, this dividing up the requests and then not telling me what responses are for what parts of the request, even when I ask directly…. is the same tactic the MCPD used, resulting in me NEVER receiving a response to my UIPA request for the rest of the emergency services CAD transcript. The MCFD said they could only give me the transcript up to 5:17, when it was said there was one person in critical condition in the USCG helicopter and they were trying to decide where to transport the victim to Maui, or to Honolulu. I’m not sure what is so special about 5:17, that the Fire Dept’s access to further communications should have been shut off right there, but I was told I had to get the rest of it from the MCPD. I requested the CAD transcript at the same time as I requested the autopsy report and the investigative record regarding this rescue call and the follow-up, but the MCPD sent just the CAD transcript part to the county’s attorneys.

 

Mandatory Occurrence Report

MOR__HCF-M-2013_1211-0009

 

This is the Mandatory Occurrence Report filed by the Investigator In Charge at the Honolulu Control Facility, reporting the Dec 11, 2013 water landing resulting in the alleged death of Hawaii Health Director, Loretta Fuddy. It was mandatory because the accident involved a commercial aircraft and there was a fatality. It was filed by the Honolulu Control Facility because, it says, the Operational Supervisor in Charge (OSIC) was in contact with N687MA – which means it CANNOT be classified as a “no services” accident as the FAA claimed when saying they destroyed records regarding this water landing.

FAA Claims Fuddy Crash Records Destroyed

Addition: the procedures the FAA is required to follow for accidents involving commercial aircraft and/or fatalities or serious injuries can be seen at http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/JO8020.16A.pdf , starting with paragraph 71 on page 27 of that PDF.

I did an interview with the Hagmann and Hagmann Report, which can be seen at http://www.frequency.com/video/hagmann-hagmann-15-july-2014/181264656/-/5-1002

What follows is a summary of one of the major points. (The request and response are found at https://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/faa-foia-request-2-and-disclosure-letter.pdf ):

I submitted a FOIA request for FAA records related to the “Fuddy crash”, including radar, radio, computer records, handwritten notes, emails, and  phone calls including inter- and intra-agency phone calls during the 2-8pm HST time period as well as in the follow-up to the water landing of N687MA.

 

The FAA responded by sending from the Honolulu Control Facility (HCF)  some air traffic audio files, Daily Record of Facility Operation, Mandatory Occurrence Report, and  National Traffic Management Log (NTML). They also sent the result of a computer search for NOTAM’s (Notices to Airmen) for the Maui FAA facility.

 

The NTML had the identities of 3 “special operations” military aircraft redacted – one of which was scheduled in advance for 3-4pm HST on Dec 11th. The audio files suggest that this operation was in the Molokai/Kalaupapa area and left the area around the same time as the crash (based on the FAA investigator’s calculated time for the crash).

 

But beyond that, the FAA said that all the other records which would have been responsive to my request were destroyed.

 

No radar, no computer records/files, no handwritten notes, no emails, no phone calls. There were no other records responsive to my request; whatever might have existed had been destroyed:

 

“The search revealed no ATO records responsive to items 3, 4, 7. 9, 10, 12, and 13 of your request. There are no ATO provisions for recording the frequencies listed in items 12 and 13. In addition, this accident was classified as a “no services” accident, meaning no FAA facility had contact with the aircraft. No transcripts were created and any radar data responsive to item 9 or additional audio re-recordings that may have existed have been destroyed in accordance with FAA Order 7210.3Y, Facility Operation and Administration…”

 

A Mandatory Occurrence Report is the report required to be filed (usually by the last FAA facility to have contact with the plane before the accident) when a report and “accident package” and file are mandated because the accident involved a commercial aircraft and/or fatalities or serious injury. If there is a MOR there also has to be an “accident package” – pertinent records (of the very kinds I asked to see) collected (and retained for 5 years) by the reporting facility from all the FAA or FAA-contracted facilities which could have relevant records. HCF filed the MOR because (according to the MOR) HCF’s  Operational Supervisor in Charge was in contact with N687MA – although none of the audio files disclosed to me  showed that, and the frequency for the contact was not included in the MOR.

Those records should not have been destroyed. If they truly have been destroyed someone should go to jail for destroying them. If they haven’t been destroyed, somebody should go to jail for lying in an official FOIA response, in order to keep from being forced to disclose those records.

There’s more, which can be heard on the audio linked above. But for now I want to make sure that people realize the enormity of the FAA’s claim that they destroyed these records. There are a TON of discrepancies in the official records that have been made available to me, including these FAA written and audio files. But we can’t get to the bottom of what really happened because the FAA records which would reveal exactly what happened have been destroyed. according to the official FAA FOIA response.

Some Background Information

Some have expressed concern because I’ve not posted for a while. Thank you for caring. I’ve had a lot of real-life stuff that has required my attention, in addition to the research.

To those who have given me information or input, thank you! I have read what you said and have been processing it in my mind and collating it with other information I’ve received. A lot of the processing and information I’ve got right now can’t be revealed yet because I have a bunch of pending FOIA requests and I want to make sure that state and federal agencies don’t know what discrepancies they need to try to mitigate, so they don’t know how to alter the records they give me. The records I’ve got so far show serious discrepancies on every major detail regarding this crash and the response to it, and also show some agencies manipulating the data to try to hide things. So I know that manipulation of the records is a very real possibility. I’ve been biting my tongue, trying not to say more than I should in places like Free Republic.

Every request I’ve made has been like pulling teeth, with emails disappearing, UIPA (HI’s FOIA) responses getting “lost” in the US mail, delays, appeals, non-responses, etc. I’ve had to babysit every request, forcing people to do what is required by law, force-feeding them the legal reasons why they have to respond and why the records are discloseable, appealing their non-responses or denials, reminding them they haven’t responded, double-checking to make sure they got my communications and I got theirs, looking up contact information for people who aren’t responding or to whom my request was forwarded, sorting out how my requests were divided and whose responses are about what part of the request (a way that the FAA was able to cancel a request, since I didn’t know that the longer deadline I was given only applied to a portion of the request  that was separated from my original request without the agency telling me what part was separated), etc.

So it’s been a zoo. The extra people in the water just minutes after the crash strongly suggest that the crash was planned in advance. I will say that the combined records so far allude to 11 people who were pulled from the water by rescuers and at least another 2 who swam ashore. That’s 13 people when the “official narrative” claims only 9 were there. So the extra people shown in the video are also corroborated by the records, with summaries provided to the public contradicting what’s in the internal records.

Why was the crash planned? The answer to that depends on whether Fuddy is actually dead. Some of my records requests are trying to get to the bottom of that, using records that are required public disclosures. MAJOR obstructions on all those records.

Part of the obstructions could be legally-justified, IF this crash was planned in order to put Fuddy into witness protection – if not on a federal level then on a state level. Either level would make it mandatory for the agencies to hide information which would reveal Fuddy’s hidden protected status, if the AG so ordered it. HI statute allows the AG to do ANYTHING that he/she deems necessary to “protect” somebody who somewhere down the line might testify for the government in some investigation or legal proceeding – as long as the AG believes that investigation/case will have a lot of people interested in it and the potential witness could be in danger.

Rather than take the time to rewrite everything, I’m going to adapt what I posted elsewhere, about that, and about the whole idea of faked deaths and whether it is an unthinkably crazy theory. Given the evidence that the crash was planned, the alternate theory is murder.

The rest of this post is how I responded when asked the question, “Who/what was in the casket?”:

I have no way of knowing because the image that I know is genuinely from the funeral and shows some of the interior of the casket doesn’t seem to match the photoshopped images. What’s in the middle of the casket in the genuine photo looks dark and round, not like the pasty-white hands from the other images. There’s not much empty space on either side of the person, in the casket showing the hands. But it seems like you can see the whole side cushion inside the coffin in the genuine photo – with no arms, torso or anything showing. The style of the casket seems different – rounded top versus flat top, different profile when the lid was open, etc. The images just don’t seem to match.

And I can’t help but wonder why they photoshopped the other images.

So I don’t know. I have no way of knowing. What I do know is that something seems screwy, with the photoshopping and the images not seeming to match.

And I suppose Fred is right. I suppose you’re setting me up to laugh at me, because of course funerals are NEVER faked. Reading a bit, I find that drownings are the easiest way to fake a death because there doesn’t have to be a body. That makes it all the more interesting that the acting coroner’s information officer, Lt William Juan, was quoted in the LA Times the day after the crash, saying that Fuddy’s body was retrieved from the wreckage. The confusion over how many people were in the plane, how many swam ashore, who picked them out of the water, etc means that to this day the public claims of what really happened don’t match the number of people reported in the records as having been retrieved. There are differing numbers reported as having been transported. The lat-longitude coordinates for where the helos went when they transported people make no sense.

Confusion like that allowed several different claims to be an option – from Fuddy drowning and her body not being found, to her drowned body being retrieved from the wreckage, to her dying in the water, to her being in critical condition when found but dying while she was being worked on… And almost all those stories have been simultaneously claimed by different people in the reports or in the media statements. There may have been Plan A, Plan B, Plan C, and Plan D, and people got confused over which one was actually going to be used. Maybe it depended on how things went. For whatever reason, the timing of the crash being discovered, the media report of one dead, the timing of when the helicopters were where and what was in the Fire Dept versus the USCG CAD transcripts, when the aircraft arrived, etc were all off as well as the stories of where and in what condition Fuddy was found, by whom, by whom she was lifted, where she was taken once lifted, etc, which are all off. They have internal and external inconsistencies. Which is what clued in a lot of people (including myself) to the suspicious nature of this crash, even before the video surfaced showing extra people and equipment in the water.

At http://thekojonnamdishow.org/audio-player?nid=11442 there is a 2002 interview with the guy who founded the federal Witsec program. I believe around the 30-minute mark he says that they don’t need to do elaborate schemes to make it appear that somebody died because the US is a big enough place that a person can effectively be hidden (Note that this was in 2002 – before we had surveillance cameras, drones, etc all over the place). And that’s probably true for low-profile people. It might not be as true for somebody widely-known, and especially if it is somebody people all over the country might recognize and suspect as still being alive.

Such a person might not so easily hide in this age of surveillance and social media – as evidenced by the fact that by the time of Fuddy’s funeral a dear Freeper sleuth had discovered Fuddy’s alternate facebook account using the name she thought only her friends would recognize: Deliana Antone, the name under which it is claimed that she bought with cash a multi-million-dollar house in Florida shortly after her alleged death.

An interesting factoid about the FEDERAL WITSEC program: people in the program are not allowed to contact their non-protected friends and relatives after getting their new identity and are urged to choose a new LAST NAME but to keep their original first name. By using Deliana instead of Loretta, Fuddy would have ensured that her friends and family would be able to know it was her – and especially since she already had a facebook account under that name (though it is impossible to know who set up that FB account or when…)

Another interesting factoid: the feds will not provide a credit record for the new identity taken by people in the WITSEC program. If such a person wanted to buy a house they would not have the credit references needed to get a loan. They would have to pay cash.

The introduction to that audio clip says, “From arranging fake funerals to obtaining breast implants for a mobster’s wife — the federal witness protection program has done and seen it all. Gerald Shur, the man who created the program, joins Kojo for a behind-the-scenes discussion.” That is just one of the places where it is mentioned that a fake funeral can be part of the process of giving somebody a new identity. As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, the Obama regime gave dozens of Benghazi witnesses new identities in order to keep them hidden from Congressional investigators, so the Obama regime probably has the fake funeral streamlined pretty well by now…

HRS 338-17.7 is where the HDOH (under the control of the Director) is authorized to give a new, totally fake BC for somebody with a Hawaii BC if law enforcement says a BC with different claims is necessary for that person’s protection. This may be the law that Fuddy relied upon as a legal fig leaf to cover her behind when she ordered the creation of Obama’s fake BC. As far as I know, a death certificate is not similarly authorized, BUT in HRS 28-101 (seen at http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol01_Ch0001-0042F/HRS0028/HRS_0028-0101.htm ) the Attorney General is given permission to do ANYTHING he/she deems necessary to protect a potential witness in what could potentially be a case (or a mere INVESTIGATION…) with high public interest. Here’s what it says (emphasis mine):

“(a) The attorney general shall establish a statewide witness program through which the attorney general may fund or provide for the security and protection of a government witness or a potential government witness in an official proceeding or investigation where the attorney general determines that an offense such as those described in section 710-1071 (intimidating a witness), 710-1072 (tampering with a witness), or 710-1072.2 (retaliating against a witness) is likely to be committed or which involves great public interest…

“(b) In connection with the security and protection of a witness, a potential witness, or an immediate family member or close associate of a witness or potential witness, the attorney general may fund or take ANY ACTION the attorney general determines to be necessary to protect such person from bodily injury, or to assure the person’s health, safety, and welfare, for as long as, in the judgment of the attorney general, such danger exists.”

Notice this covers a “potential government witness” for any kind of investigation or proceeding. This could be applied to almost any situation that the AG could imagine cropping up in the future, as long as he/she thinks the case would have high public interest.

And “any action” would cover a fake autopsy and death certificate, or anything else. The state AG would have the authority to order the Maui County Police Chief to fake an autopsy, for instance, or request the USCG to lie about what happened in a staged rescue call.

That is a LOT of leeway. The state AG has a signed blank check in that statute. And that would be David Louie – the guy who would never say for sure whether Neal Palafox was being investigated for Medicare billing fraud, when they forced Palafox to resign (while lying and saying he resigned for “personal reasons”) so they could get Fuddy as HDOH director instead, the day after Birtherreport reported that Gov. Abercrombie had told Mike Evans there wasn’t a birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii…

And of course, though the state statute probably means the STATE AG in that statute, rather than the US AG, it is interesting to note that when the Maui County Police Chief was deciding on the cause of death for Fuddy, the US Attorney General’s wife was there in Maui along with Michelle Obama and Valerie Jarrett, demanding the chief provide lots and lots of security for them so they were constantly in his face. Michelle was staying there indefinitely, but the day that the Police Chief announced cardiac arrhythmia as the accidental cause of death, it was revealed that Michelle would be going back to DC.

At http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faked_death it lists some notable faked deaths.

Another list of faked deaths is at http://marlowe-shakespeare.blogspot.com/2010/01/in-plain-sight-what-witness-protection.html where it says:

“Daryl Pinksen said…

I thought it might be useful to provide a list of links to stories about people who tried, and ultimately failed, to fake their own deaths.(It is worth noting that those who are successful in the attempt do not make the news.)

Consider that these cases date only from the past decade or so, and represent only those that turned up in a quick Google search. If we extrapolate this rate back 400 years, the scenario does become mundane.

The point is that while faking one’s death may be sensational, it is far from extraordinary.

1. Bruce Leyte
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2009/03/11/leyte-guilty-plea.html

2. Patrick McDermott (suspected, Olivia Newton-John’s husband)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1129814/Olivia-Newton-Johns-partner-staged-death-alive-U-S-investigators-claim.html

3. John Stonehouse
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/december/24/newsid_2540000/2540557.stm

4-6. Carl Hackett, Graham Cardwell, Thomas Osmond
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-499515/The-men-decided-Reggie-Perrin.html

7. Bennie Wint
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1132483/Man-faked-death-went-run-20-years-believing-police-They-werent.html

8. Marcus Shrenk
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28623108/

9. Jenaro Hernandez
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/aug/13/missing-businessman-arrested-spain

10. John Sung Park
http://www.cdnn.info/news/safety/s090101.html

11. Daniel Kinge
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/01/10/paedo-sir-faked-his-own-death-115875-21955207/

12. Harry Gordon
http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/55130

13. Bill Grothe
http://nashvillecitypaper.com/content/city-news/police-allege-music-row-attorney-faked-his-own-death

14. Gubraman Subramaniam
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSPAT26223520080602

15. Sean Lovelock-Woodall (suspected)
http://www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/news/Man-defends-brother-claims-faked-death/article-1589692-detail/article.html

16. Bruce Dale
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10521036&pnum=1

17. Jason Hart
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1099850_ebay_conman_faked_his_death

18. John Darwin
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/north-east-news/todays-evening-chronicle/2009/08/17/canoe-man-tells-how-he-faked-his-own-death-72703-24459513/

19. John Fossett (suspected, later disproved)
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/fossett-may-have-faked-his-death/story-e6frg6tf-1111117040246

20. Jeremy Daniel Oakley
http://www.canada.com/nanaimodailynews/news/story.html?id=d3ed0c94-2e62-47af-9231-cb656b8cb5a5

There are other links somebody gave me too, but I can’t find them right now. It’s been a long day and I need to go to bed. Those who want to laugh at me are going to do so no matter what I say anyway so this is really just for the benefit of anybody who cares to know some factual information instead of guffawing based on ignorance.

Means, motive, and opportunity. They were all there that day. Just a couple weeks before this crash, Mike Zullo had told Carl Gallups that they had universe-shattering evidence that was going to require a response from the feds – the feds who could appoint a Congressional investigation having the ability to override Eric Holder’s fox-guarding-the-henhouse position of sabotaging real justice. Given what we know about the NSA, it’s a really good bet that Obama’s people know what evidence Zullo and Arpaio have. They knew this was serious. And it is, people. It is VERY serious.

Serious as a heart attack.

Misc Images

This is where I’ll dump various images needed in conversations. Right now I can’t post any images at ATS and can only link to thumbnails in my ATS library so to allow people to see stuff clearly I’ll have to put things here.

Here’s an image of a helicopter that is said to be dropping off victims from the Fuddy crash directly at the Queens Medical Center helipad in Honolulu. Note the red lettering on the helipad and the arrows pointing to the H in the middle. Also notice the concrete blocks to the right behind the roof of the hospital leading to what appears to be a taller building directly behind the helicopter, and the hillside with the trees and what looks like power poles:

supposed queens landing

Now let’s look at the Bing Maps image of Queens Medical Center. Notice the placement of the metal structures to understand where the camera would have to be (Mikeultra at ATS circled the area), the open triangle on the roof,  and the 6 windows/stories you can count on the interior of the triangle:

queens hospital bing maps

Here’s the Google image of Queens:

queens hospital google

And here’s a close-up of the landing pad. Note the black lettering and straight (not pointed) lines pointing to the H in the middle. Sigh. Nothing I do in this version of Paint will get rid of the white space surrounding the image, which is keeping this from being able to be larger here.  I don’t know if clicking on the image will make it bigger for you or not.:

queens hospital landing pad bigger

The conversation starts at http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread999641/pg20#pid17647254 , as to whether the building behindthat looks taller in the helicopter photo could actually be a 2-3-story building that’s 3-4 blocks away. Here’s the image that shows that theory (note that there is an inset to show the proposed building; there’s not a border on the inset so it’s a little hard to see that it’s an inset) This is copying as very large on my admin screen so you may have to click on the image to see the whole thing:

Private – Now Public

 

Here are some screenshots from the Nightline video. If anybody has expertise in sorting out all the information contained in these images, please chime in:

 

Plane Image A

Plane Image A

 

Plane image B

Plane image B

Plane Image C

Plane Image C

Plane image D

Plane image D

Plane image E

Plane image E

Plane Image F

Plane Image F

Plane Image G

Plane Image G

Plane Image H

Plane Image H

Plane Image I

Plane Image I

Plane Image J

Plane Image J

Plane Image K

Plane Image K

Plane Image L

Plane Image L

Plane Image M

Plane Image M

Plane Image N

Plane Image N

Plane Image O

Plane Image O

Plane Image P

Plane Image P

Plane Image Q

Plane Image Q

Plane Image R

Plane Image R

Plane Image S

Plane Image S

plane underwater t

Plane Image U

Plane Image U

Plane Image V

Plane Image V

Plane Image X

Plane Image X

 

These are images from “Good Morning America”. Trying to figure out what the “stick”/tube type thing is…

Stick A

Stick A

Stick B

Stick B

Stick C

Stick C

Stick D

Stick D

Stick E Context

Stick E Context

Stick F

Stick F

Stick G

Stick G

stick h

Stick I Context

Stick I Context

Stick J

Stick J

Stick K

Stick K

 

And these are from Nightline:

Stick L

Stick L from Nightline

Stick M from Nightline

Stick M from Nightline

Stick N from Nightline

Stick N from Nightline

Stick O from Nightline

Stick O from Nightline

Stick P from Nightline after skipping 3 frames

Stick P from Nightline after skipping 3 frames

Kawasaki Underwater Images

Here are the full-screen, no-cropping, no-enhancing images of the Kawasaki underwater sequence, with Bandicam timestamp showing (slowed down 16x I think) Looks like I left out 2 images in the youtube – the ones where you can’t see the yellow.

These first ones are before the ones I included in the youtube; they give some context. Turns out that Kawasaki (and probably the 70-ish-year-old guy) apparently wasn’t treading water. He was apparently holding onto a black cushion.

nl 1-05-55-63

nl 1-05-55-63nl 1-05-58-17nl 1-06-00-30nl 1-06-01-37nl 1-06-03-47nl 1-06-05-63nl 1-06-10-33nl 1-06-12-50nl 1-06-12-50 nl 1-06-14-67nl 1-06-14-67 nl 1-06-16-73nl 1-06-18-90nl 1-06-22-10nl 1-06-24-30nl 1-06-26-43nl 1-06-28-60nl 1-06-29-60

This one is ZTnl 1-06-32-73

ZUnl 1-06-33-87

ZVnl 1-06-35-93

ZW:nl 1-06-37-03

 

I skipped these next 2, apparentlynl 1-06-39-20

nl 1-06-40-27

 

ZX:nl 1-06-42-53

ZY:nl 1-06-44-53

 

ZZ:nl 1-06-45-63

ZZA:nl 1-06-47-80

ZZB:nl 1-06-49-83

ZZC:nl 1-06-50-93

I stopped there. The frames to finish out the entire sequence of underwater shots are these last 2.

nl 1-06-53-10nl 1-06-55-30