Here are some additional links to support that Bennett had to “re-word” his request in order to get a response:
Wisch claiming Bennett hadn’t provided proof that he is eligible to receive verification: http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://www.myfoxphoenix.com/Global/story.asp?S=14880347&clienttype=printable
Bennett saying he has to “re-word” his request: http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/ken_bennett_apologizes_obama_birther_hawaii_arizona.php
Bennett quoted as saying, ” I’m happy that we got what we asked for and that’s what I was expecting all along ” : http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/2012/05/22/20120522obama-birth-hawaii-arizona-verification.html
Butterdezillion's Blog 
13 Comments
I posted a digested and edited excerpt here:
http://www.trueblueliberty.com/index.php?topic=10801.0
They confirmed he has a Kenyan father!
They confirmed that the birth record CLAIMS he had a Kenyan father. We have to remember that the list of things to be verified only asked for verification that those items were CLAIMED on the birth record, as per the specific instructions for that special verification. To get the HDOH to verify what the legally-probative TRUTH is, they’d have to respond to a standard verification, through a request form. That’s why it’s so important that the HI AG made Bennett withdraw that request form.
It is beginning to look like Bennett has caved on the issue (if that was not his intention from the beginning) and is claiming to be satisfied with what amounts to hearsay evidence. Worse still, by accepting that assurance as legitimate proof for ballot inclusion it becomes unlikely that any other state will engage in a separate verification. Granted, the pressures to abandon this issue must have been significant, but will this now be the end of AZ’s interest in the matter? Does the evidence of fraud in other documentation count for nothing? Will this also cut off Arpaio’s investigation at the knees?
Arpaio implied in an interview that he is getting pressure from the AZ SOS’s office to shut down the criminal investigation but he’s not going to. I just saw a news clip where he ways if he needs to send 10 deputies to Hawaii he’ll do it. lol. Gotta love that guy! And keep praying for him too…
I sent Bennett an e-mail asking him why he withdrew his official request form – which included the request for the HDOH to verify the genuine, legally-probative facts that are actually relevant to presidential eligibility (birthplace and date, and names of parents). We’ll see what he says…
This “verification” actually strongly suggests that Obama’s BC is amended and late, which is why Obama had to forge a long-form to present the public (couldn’t have the “LATE” and “ALTERED” stamps showing, nor the notation of evidence presented – probably saying that a 2006 affidavit by his Chicago doctor supplied the birth weight to complete the BC). It’s also why the HDOH was willing to verify that the information on Obama’s long-form matches what is on their record, but was NOT willing to say that Obama’s posted long-form is a “true and accurate representation of the record on file”.
The proper response for other states would be to bear down and submit actual verification request forms like the one Bennett withdrew. Of course, HI has indicated that if anybody tries to make them verify the actual legally-probative FACTS (rather than simply verifying what is CLAIMED) the HI AG will say they haven’t adequately proven that they qualify to have those facts verified.
Coincidence?
Friday, March 23, 2012
INS DOC FOUND: U.S. CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO ONE EAST AFRICAN-BORN CHILD OF U.S. CITIZEN IN 1961!
IMPLICATIVE DISCOVERY: A government document found buried in the online reference section of a Boston Public Library archive bolsters a growing mountain of evidentiary data against Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be president. The document indicates that a consular officer issued a single certificate of statutory citizenship, within the time frame including August 4, 1961, to a child born to a U.S. citizen between July 1st and December 31st, 1961 in the Kenyan region of Africa. The record also reveals that the certificate was the only one issued for this specific type of arrival in the U.S. over a span of more than 18 months, among thousands from other parts of the world.
By Dan Crosby
of THE DAILY PEN
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/03/ins-doc-found-us-certificate-issued-to.html
Durus,
This is misleading “in the Kenyan region of Africa.” If you look at the table they used it actually is for all of Africa with the exception of Libya, Morocco, South Africa, Egypt. The authors just assume it is Kenya.
The same documents say that between July 1st, 1961 and June 30th, 1962, only one person came to the United States from Kenya by air. The rest came by sea. That one person was not a citizen.
butterdezillion,
I encourage you to forward your opinions and findings to Arpaio’s team if you can. You might want to start by sending your stuff to Dr. Corsi as he working closely with Arpaio. Dr. Corsi can then forward your stuff to Arpaio to see what they make of it and can do with it. Showing your findings on blog is good but it really needs to be part of the investigation if any good is to come out of it.
Thanks, John. I did sent it to Mike Zullo but I’m trying to confirm that he received it since he didn’t respond as he usually does. I’ve had communications intercepted and not delivered in the past so I always have to check if there’s monkey business when I don’t hear back. Makes me seem bothersome and paranoid but that’s the natural result when you’ve got a DHS that puts its nose into average citizens’ e-mails.
Is anyone surprised in Hawaii gov’s response?
Former 2008 Hawaii Dem Party Chair Brian Schatz (elected in 2010 to LtGov for Hawaii) signed an official campaign document omitting the statement Obama was Constitutionally qualified to be on Hawaii’s ballot. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=207197
If the documents listed in this article are valid, Brian Schatz is waltzing scot-free regarding his signature and wording on this 27 August 2008 memo noted in the article. Someone needs to call Brian out publicly and nationally for signing this form and the wording he knew was in it. Now that he apparently provided a cover-up favor to the DNC which guaranteed he’d get Lt. Governor in Hawaii, Mr. Schatz needs to come clean on why he approved and authorized this release. Where has the ethical conscience and compass of our government gone? Forget what the media calls the birth issue, this has to do with why Brian validated for our state the national democratic presidential candidate while “clearly omitting” the authentication that the candidate was Constitutionally qualified. In stark contrast, two predecessors from Brian’s party, Brikwood Galuteria and Alfred Lardizabul, did the right thing by clearly certifying John Kerry in 2004 and Al Gore in 2000 as Constitutionally qualified candidates. If we went back further in time, we’d probably find Brian’s actions as Democratic Party Chair here are in clear contrast to far more than just documentation of the last few presidential elections. Brian most likely is not to fault in everything related to this. Many hands across our nation appear to have been deep in the cookie jar. The democratic party was fed a bad deal with what is most likely one of the biggest frauds in American history. Good people should have stopped it. Nothing excuses Brian Schatz, or any other elected or appointed leader, from actions of this weight and consequence.
Our country has gone down a road where our children look up and wonder if anyone in leadership has integrity. Few leaders have touched an honest approach to the shadowy skullduggery surrounding the 2008 election…and the world is just suppose to be okay with it.
Teenagers and young adults are in tune with what is going on and watching to see how we make decisions and lead. We can’t blame them for not being engaged if we can’t make them believe that “right” is worth championing for.
It was Hillary’s camp that started the first legal cases against Obama’s eligibility two weeks after the 2008 DNC convention. Hillary knew Obama was ineligible. That’s why, as the beltway-insider, in early 2008 she yanked him into an intentionally uncomfortable 6-person Senate committee to dig through McCain’s eligibility. Initially Hillary probably planned to select Obama as her VP choice and surge to a clear victory with a stunning ticket; however, when Obama’s own campaign for the WH overtook Mrs. Clinton’s, thermo-nuclear war probably began between Dean, Soros, and the Clintons. Two weeks before the election, even Wolf on CNN said “If Obama is found ineligible, can Hilary win on a 2-week run?” The heat was on all the way to the end.
Reid and Pelosi were reluctant on Obama as the Dem candidate and knew joining on the Obama bandwagon could end in prison like Colson got after Watergate. That’s why Pelosi distanced herself as best she could by not certifying, at least for Hawaii, that Obama was Constitutionally eligible. She knew he wasn’t.
Yes Bush and Cheney most likely knew Obama was ineligible, so did Governor Lingle, so did Howard Dean, so did Aunt Bea and Andy Griffith. Everyone had to bend for two reasons: too many secrets, and to avoid national and international race and religious riots.
For crying out loud, Howard Dean created the largest super majority in a half century and then just a few days after the 2008 election resigns as DNC chair. Why? Answer: Separation. Space. Distance. From what? Ending up like those tangled up in Watergate. Even Blago got his foot tangled in the 2008 grab-bag net.
The bottom-line: Hawaii cannot produce the original piece of microfilm that has the Nordyke twins’ full birth certs and Obama’s connected to it. Obama’s never existed. Everyone knows this to be true.
That’s why in 2008 the Hawaii Democratic Party Chair Brian Schatz wouldn’t certify Obama as Constitutionally eligible as the Hawaii Dem Party did for Gore in 2000 and for Kerry in 2004. Like many others, to create some legal separation and distance from what was becoming a sticky problem, Brian only cited the DNC Convention guidelines rather than the Constitution regarding Obama’s eligibility to run on Hawaii’s ballot.
In addition, new legitimate evidence indicates Obama’s father is very likely Frank Marshall Davis, not Obama Sr. Where Obama’s mother gave birth to her son is still unclear, but Obama is the splitting image of Frank Davis, and bares no resemblance to Obama Sr. See ‘Dreams of My Real Father’ video.
Butter, your analysis of what they have done makes sense to me and just seems to all fit together like a glove.
Here’s my question. Assuming anyone ever gets a look at what is in the haw doh files, isn’t the most likely outcome that all they will find is the ammendment docs and that the original will be……gone? I don’t care whether their laws say that the original is supposed to be there or not. If the law says they are to keep the original, they they will simply add the word “mysteriously” to the word ‘missing’.
The more i think about it, the more i come to the conclusion that i would simply be shocked beyond belief if the original documents were still in the file. They just won’t be there. They will say that they got “accidentally” lost somehow, and then the full compliment of liars in this country will simply say that the ammended bc is “good enough” and we should move on.
We are not going to find a doc that says where he was really born. Their crowd is simply not stupid enough to leave it in there.
That the ammended bc doesn’t have legal value because the state registrar didn’t verify the info won’t matter to the powers that be.
The only way this will ever be resolved is if the american people, a big enough percentage of them, won’t take it anymore. Unfortunately, i don’t have confidence that enough of them feel that way.
On the bright side, this is part of the ‘falling away’ that we know about, and you know what is near.
That’s why Sheriff Joe is so right to be demanding the microfilms. Multiple copies of those are storeed in different locations to insure that not all copies would be destroyed in a “natural disaster”.
You’re absolutely right that nothing will happen on this until enough of the public says “Enough!” That’s why it was so critical for Soros to threaten the CONSERVATIVES. He didn’t even bother to threaten ABC and CNN – at least not before March of 2009; he might have done so since then. But getting CONSERVATIVES to shut up and poo-pooh this trampling of the rule of law was what was critical. The future existence of this country is truly in the hands of people like Rush, Hannity, Levin, the Breitbart people, etc – unless we’ve got enough people who value the rule of law to the point that they don’t care if they are mocked by people like that.
Basically people have to decide whether they’re running for homecoming king/queen, or whether they are engaged in a bloody war for the existence of this nation. If enough people still think it’s about appearing “cool”, then you and I both know where this is headed. The labor before the final delivery.