Letter Faxed to Every Republican Member of Congress

CRITICALLY & LEGALLY URGENT FOR EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS:

                                                                                                                               

Hawaii state registrar Alvin Onaka has publicly certified to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that Barack Obama’s HI birth certificate is legally non-valid and the White House image is a forgery. He also confirmed to KS SOS Kris Kobach that the information contained in the White House image is NOT “identical to” that in the official record.

 

Many of you have replied to concerned constituents that the matter is settled by the public statements of Hawaii officials, the HDOH birth index list, the newspaper birth announcements, and Obama’s posted short-form and long-form birth certificates.  Onaka’s disclosure – the only one made by a HI official under oath –negates all that and fits the vast legal and forensic evidence collected so far, some of which is in my affidavit (privately posted at <REDACTED> for NE criminal case #B2-119<REDACTED>. Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Commander, Mike Zullo  (both of whom initially disbelieved the skeptics) have both signed affidavits saying there is legal-quality FORENSIC evidence that Obama’s long-form birth certificate and draft registration are forged. Onaka has now revealed the REASON for the forgery: to hide the non-validity of the birth record. Evidence in my affidavit proves (among other things) that the 1960-64 birth index includes non-valid records.

 

Onaka’s disclosure is proof of results-altering election fraud in every state in this country, since fraudulent filing documents were used to place Obama on every state’s ballot. Absent a non-Hawaii birth record, Obama doesn’t even have a legally-determined birth date, place, or parents so nobody can lawfully say he meets the age or citizenship requirements to be President – and yet every Certification of Nomination falsely swears that he is eligible.  EVERY electoral vote for Obama is thus now LEGALLY KNOWN to be fraudulently-obtained and must not be certified as lawful on Jan 8th. As with the Sandusky case, those with knowledge have legal responsibility to act, and that is now you.

 

Even if the majority in Congress wrongly certifies the electoral vote, that only makes Obama the President-elect. The 20th Amendment says that if the President-elect fails to qualify by Jan 20th, the Vice-President-elect must “act as President”. Without any legally-determined birth date, birth place, or birth parents, there is no way that Barack Obama could have qualified by Jan 20, 2009 – or can qualify by Jan 20, 2013, unless his birth facts ARE legally determined. The biggest favor any one of you can do for this whole process (and for Obama himself if he is to become President LAWFULLY) is to file a lawsuit (with standing) challenging Obama’s eligibility so that the records will be presented as evidence to a JUDICIAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE person or body (not legislative, according to Hawaii statute 338-17, so Congress is powerless on this issue) and birth facts determined. That’s the only way Obama can “qualify” by Jan 20, 2013.

 

Our President has committed perjury 6 times by swearing (in AZ, NC, and WV) that he is eligible, knowing that he has no valid HI birth certificate (and claiming a Kenyan birth in his bio until 2007), and let his spokesmen pass off two forgeries as genuine on his behalf. He knowingly allowed a decorated military surgeon to lose his life’s savings and retirement and spend 6 months in prison for simply wanting to know if his combat orders were lawful, or whether they Constitutionally had to come from Joe Biden instead – who OPPOSED the “surge”.

 

It appears that many felonies have been committed. An impeachment must precede a criminal investigation and trial, so failure to impeach is obstruction of equal protection & the rule of law – without which, none of your life’s work even matters because the laws you make will only be enforced when politically expedient to the powerful. A banana republic. DON’T LET THAT HAPPEN IN THE AMERICA YOU HAND YOUR CHILDREN, GRANDCHILDREN, OR FRIENDS. Instead, keep your oath and love your families. Truth matters.  Please reply to tell me what you will do to defend truth, the rule of law, and the Constitution you swore to defend.

 

Sincerely,

                  

Nellie <CONTACT INFO REDACTED>

 

41 Comments

  1. multisigma
    Posted December 27, 2012 at 8:35 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Historically, this is an event of great significance in that it establishes in public records that a discrepancy was recognized. Further, it is now also established that members of Congress were duly petitioned by a constituent on the matter. This is no small amount of progress.
    But given the current attitude and agenda on Capitol Hill, it may be that the bottom line for this entire issue will be an opportunity to someday admonish America that “we told you so”.
    However, this will also amount to a test of the sincerity of those who were elected on the basis of their promises to stand up for the Constitution to act upon evidence of its violation. That, too, will be significant in terms of its historical perspective.

  2. Katie
    Posted December 27, 2012 at 9:26 pm | Permalink | Reply

    More proof of your insanity? You and Orly should book a room together at the nearest hospital for the mentally ill ASAP. You’re definitely in need of professional help although probably too far gone to ever be able to live in society again.

    • Posted December 27, 2012 at 10:01 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Katie, I normally don’t print ad hominems but this time I will because I want to tell you something. Officer Flood of the Lincoln Police Department strongly disagrees with you. I’ve got 187 pages of evidence in an affidavit that says you’re wrong. Officer Flood would not have had a case number assigned to my criminal report if he had thought otherwise.

      If I were you, I would be careful about what you say. I have your IP address and what you are doing is known in the law enforcement system as libel. Cease and desist.

      • Posted December 28, 2012 at 11:43 pm | Permalink

        Libel is a civil action–not a criminal (law enforcement) matter.

    • drkate
      Posted December 29, 2012 at 6:01 am | Permalink | Reply

      Unbelievable, after all this time you still have your head in the sand. You are willfully ignorant.

      • Posted December 31, 2012 at 4:18 am | Permalink

        She is not ONLY willfully ignorant, but a useful idiot. Can anyone say “Germany prior to WWII”???

  3. drkate
    Posted December 29, 2012 at 6:03 am | Permalink | Reply

    Congratulations and THANK YOU for this effort. I will spread the word and get on the phone. did you know they changed the date to January 4?

    • Posted December 29, 2012 at 9:28 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Yes, somebody on Free Republic mentioned the date change. I’m glad he did.

      Thank you for any help you and your friends can give. If the members of Congress meant anything they said in the letters they sent to constitutents – about the issue already being decided by the HI government – then Onaka’s legal disclosure should spring them quickly into action. I guess we’ll see how many of them actually meant what they said.

      • Monica
        Posted December 31, 2012 at 6:09 am | Permalink

        The trial date is January 3rd at 2pm. It was never changed. Anyone who wants to show their support should be there. Prayers for Dr. Taitz and America!

  4. Ron
    Posted December 29, 2012 at 3:50 pm | Permalink | Reply

    where is a link to the evidence?

    or a link to onaka’s disclosure?

    i need to read it for myself before i send any letters.

    thanks, ron

    • Posted December 29, 2012 at 9:57 pm | Permalink | Reply

      The disclosure is in what Onaka DIDN’T say in his verification. Bennett mentioned an enclosed application for a verification and asked for some other things to be verified IN ADDITION TO the items on that enclosed application. What people need to realize is that on that official application Bennett asked Onaka to verify that Barack Hussein Obama, II, male, was born on Aug 4, 1961 in Honolulu on the island of Oahu, to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama. By HI statute, Onaka was required to verify every one of those facts is he could certify that it was the way that the event really happened – which they do if they have a legally valid record that makes the claims the requestor is asking verification for.

      Look on the verification that Bennett received back and you do not see male, Aug 4, 1961, Oahu, Stanley Ann Dunham, or Barack Hussein Obama mentioned anywhere. You see Honolulu mentioned but Honolulu is not being verified; what Onaka verifies is the existence of a birth record which “indicates” (claims) a Honolulu birth. IOW what is being verified is the existence of the record itself. Nowhere is it said that Honolulu is verified as the actual place of birth.

      So Onaka cannot verify that Obama was born male, that his b-day is Aug 4, 1961, that the birth city was Honolulu, that the birth island was Oahu, that Stanley Ann Dunham was the mother, or that Barack Hussein Obama was the father.

      In the additional items that Bennett wanted verified, he asked for verification that the White House long-form image is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”. Onaka would not verify that. He did verify that the “information contained in” the White House image “matches” the original record. The only lawful reason for Onaka to fail to verify that the White House image is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file” is if he CAN’T verify it. IOW, Onaka is disclosing that it is NOT a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”.

      And we know that saying that the information “matches” isn’t just another way to say that it’s a true and accurate representation, because later, when KS SOS Kris Kobach asked him to verify that the information contained in the White House image “is identical to” the information contained in the original record, Onaka would not verify that. So “matches” is different than “identical to”. So there is something on the original that is not included on the White House image. But what is actually on the White House image matches what is on the original.

      If the original was a valid record, Onaka would have to verify every one of those items that matched Bennett’s request: male, Aug 4, 1961, Honolulu, Oahu, Stanley Ann Dunham, and Barack Hussein Obama. The only lawful reason for him to fail to do that is if the record they have – which makes those claims – is not legally valid and HI therefore cannot vouch for those claims (certify that as the way the event really happened).

      Onaka can only bring up birth facts that were submitted to him. If somebody didn’t submit the birth fact for verification he can’t mention that birth fact. Because Onaka mentioned Honolulu, we know that he was responding to a document where Honolulu was mentioned – and the only place it was mentioned was in the application form. So we know that Bennett did not withdraw that application form, and Onaka is acknowledging that he is responding to that form.

      The fact that he doesn’t mention Oahu tells us that he was NOT verifying Honolulu as the actual birth city – because if he was verifying Honolulu as the real city of birth he would also have to verify Oahu as the real island of birth (since Honolulu has always been on Oahu and there is no other Honolulu on a different island) – yet he never once mentioned Oahu.

      The complete request and the response are both in the PDF of the letter Klayman sent to DNC Counsel Bob Bauer. You can see it for yourself at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf That letter quotes the HI statutes that govern Onaka’s response, so everyone can see the rules he had to follow when responding.

      Let me know if this is or isn’t understandable.

    • Donna LS
      Posted January 12, 2013 at 7:33 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Per “Butter” -”Hawaii state registrar Alvin Onaka has publicly certified to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that Barack Obama’s HI birth certificate is legally non-valid and the White House image is a forgery>” Hello from Tucson, AZ – I emailed directly to the SOS here – - copying reply that I rec’d. – Dec. 31, 1912 – “Dear Ms. Schoening:

      Contrary to the recent blog, we have NOT had any further correspondence from the state of Hawaii regarding this matter.

      Regards,

      Kim Crawford

      Communications Specialist

      Arizona Office of the Secretary of State

      Public Disclosure Notice: This message and any messages in response to the sender of this message may be subject to a public records request. “

      • Posted January 13, 2013 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

        Kim Crawford apparently doesn’t understand that there didn’t need to be FURTHER correspondence, since the certification was in the letter of verification that Onaka sent to Ken Bennett on May 22, 2012 – which indirectly confirms that Obama’s HI BC is non-valid and the White House image is NOT a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file” (IOW, it is a forgery, which was also confirmed when Onaka would not verify to KS SOS Kris Kobach that the information contained in the White House image is “identical to” the information contained in the actual record).

        Bennett asked Onaka to verify that Barack Hussein Obama, II, male, was born on Aug 4, 1961, in Honolulu on the island of Oahu, to mother Stanley Ann Dunham and father Barack Hussein Obama. Onaka is required to verify any requested information that he can certify as actually having happened (IOW, information that is claimed on a valid (prima facia – legally presumed to be true) record. Onaka would not verify any of those claims as true, even though he verified that the information on the White House image (including all the above claims) match the record they have. The only lawful reason for Onaka’s response to not verify the above facts as true is if the record on which those claims are made…. is not legally valid.

        All this has already been explained to the AZ SOS’s office – when Larry Klayman sent them a carbon copy of his letter to Bauer (which can be viewed at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf ). The AZ SOS’s office received that letter on or around Sept 4th, with the certified mail receipt signed by Fernando Lopez.

  5. truth seeker
    Posted December 29, 2012 at 4:36 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Clarification please. You wrote:

    “Hawaii state registrar Alvin Onaka has publicly certified to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that Barack Obama’s HI birth certificate is legally non-valid and the White House image is a forgery.”

    Onaka in his May 22, 2012 Verification of Birth letter to Airizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett stated:

    “Additionally, I verify that the information in the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama that you attached with your request matches the original record in our files.”

    He then stated:

    “I certify that the information contained in the vital record on file with the Department of Health was used to verify the facts of the vital event.”

    As a result of these statements in the Verification of Birth letter from Hawaii State Registrar Alvin T. Onaka, Secretary of State Ken Bennett place Obama on the Arizona ballot.

    Where does Onaka say in the May 22, 2012 State of Hawaii Verification of Birth letter to Ken Bennett that Barack Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate is legally non-valid and the White House image is a forgery?

    In what document sent to Bennett does Onaka make the statement that you have provided?

    Thanks,
    truth seeker

    • Posted December 29, 2012 at 9:59 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Please look at the response I just gave Ron. The confirmation of a legally non-valid record is in what Onaka DIDN’T say, that he is legally required to say if the record on file is legally valid. Let me know if you don’t understand or still have questions. People are looking at what he said, but what he DIDN’T say is what reveals everything.

      • truth seeker
        Posted December 30, 2012 at 4:07 am | Permalink

        Having now read Bennett’s original verification request letter, and Klayman’s letter to Bauer it is very clear what you are doing. In my opinion this is very strong argument against the validity of Onaka’s letter of verification to Bennett and further discredits the authenticity of the Obama Certificate of Live Birth posted on the White House webste April 27, 2011. In light of this information it calls into question Bennett’s action to put Obama on the Arizona ballot.

        Well done Nellie. Thanks.

    • Lewis Thomasonn
      Posted December 30, 2012 at 10:00 pm | Permalink | Reply

      What Onaka actually said to Bennett was:

      Additionally, I verify that the information in the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama that you attached with your request matches the original record in our files.

      What Onaka actually said to Kobach was:

      The original Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama, II, is on file with the State of Hawaii Department of Health.
      The file number for the Certificate of live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama, II, is 151 61 10641.
      The information contained in the “Certificate of Live Birth” published at http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/president-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate and reviewed by me on the date of this verification, a copy of which is attached with your request, matches the information contained in the original Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama, II on file with the State of Hawaii Department of Health.

      • Posted December 31, 2012 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

        What Onaka did NOT say to Bennett was:

        “I verify that Barack Hussein Obama, II, male, was born on Aug 4, 1961 in Honolulu on the island of Oahu, to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama.

        I additionally verify that the birth certificate image posted on the White House website is a true and accurate representation of the original record on file.”

        Onaka is required by law to say those things if he can. So why didn’t he say them?

        What Onaka DID NOT say to Koback was:

        “I verify that the information contained in the Certificate of Live Birth published at (and use the actual link that Kobach gave instead of a different link) and reviewed by me on the date of this verification, a copy of which is attached with your request, IS IDENTICAL TO the information contained in the original Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama, II on file with the State of Hawaii Department of Health”.

        Onaka is required by law to say that if he can. So why didn’t he say it?

  6. protectourcivilrightsfreedoms
    Posted December 29, 2012 at 10:10 pm | Permalink | Reply

    PLEASE READ THESE ARTICLES!!

    VELVET REVOLUTION

    AN AMERICAN PEACEFUL CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE REVOLUTION

    http://commieblaster.com/velvet-revolution/index.html

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    IS IT TIME TO CONSIDER CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE?

    Joseph Farah: “For instance, I am not going to participate in Obamacare. I’m not going to do it as an individual, and I’m not going to do it as an employer. I would like to be joined by thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of others – maybe even millions.”

    Read more here at: http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/is-it-time-to-consider-civil-disobedience/#dPljmB5Y7FOAR2Cw.99

    I will not on this earth participate in ObamaDeathCare in any way.
    I will not agree to ever pay any fines for it. I will not participate in offering it to any employee’s that I may have. You cannot be a Christian & support ObamaDeathCare.

  7. Pattie Wagner
    Posted December 30, 2012 at 6:49 am | Permalink | Reply

    It was very obvious to me and those that knew it from day 1 that he was a fraud, I am curious about what you said about the Congress NOT being able to do anything about this?? are you telling me we have to allow a fraud to stay in power and ruin our Country ..I am confused because I thought the Congress had the power to kick him out. ot would be a crime to me if he wasn’t kicked out and every one that knew go to jail.

    • Posted December 30, 2012 at 2:07 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Congress can and must object to the certification of the electoral vote. But Congress debating the issue can never settle the issue of whether Obama himself is qualified. According to Hawaii statute (HRS 338-17), a late or altered BC has no probative (evidentiary or legal) value until it is presented as evidence to a JUDICIAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE person or body and its probative value determined. Congress is legislative; it doesn’t have to follow the Federal Rules of Evidence. But administrative and judicial proceedings must, and HI law requires that the protections of the evidentiary standards applied to late and altered BC’s in order for them to have any evidentiary value whatsoever.

      Without a valid/probative birth certificate, Obama has no legally-established birth facts. And he never can have any until that BC is presented to a person or body who is subject to the Federal Rules of Evidence. That is not Congress. Congress can debate the electoral vote certification all they want, but they can never determine whether or not Obama is eligible. The right thing for them to do is to refuse to certify the electoral vote on the grounds that the electoral votes were fraudulently obtained and eligibility cannot be known at this point, and file a lawsuit to force the BC to be presented to a court and probative value determined according to HI law, so birth facts can be legally determined and eligibility decided.

      Does that make sense?

  8. americanadvocate
    Posted December 30, 2012 at 5:18 pm | Permalink | Reply

    THANK YOU FOR THIS INFORMATION , EXPOSE ‘ , AND ADDED TRUTH THAT obummer IS A TREASONOUS , INELIGIBLE , LYING SOCIALIST FRAUD AND IMPOSTER . THIS ARTICLE WILL BE SENT TO 440 SOURCES OF ( MOSTLY ) TRUTH IN REPORTING AND TO MY PERSONAL LIST .

    • Posted December 30, 2012 at 6:21 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Thank you. Time is very, very short and getting the word out is imperative – so the weak-of-heart in Congress will find the courage to step up to the plate. This is really and truly their last stand; if Obama is allowed to take office even when every Congressman knows it is both criminal and Constitutional for him to do so… he will have the “flexibility” to do ANYTHING he wants because Congress has already neutered itself.

  9. Nancy L.
    Posted December 30, 2012 at 6:46 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Nellie, I have a concern about the paragraph near the end of your FAX to Congress that starts: “It appears that many felonies have been committed. An impeachment must precede a criminal investigation and trial, so failure to impeach is obstruction of equal protection & the rule of law –. ” I thought that only a legitimate
    President could be impeached. If he was never eligible to be President, then wouldn’t everything that he has done in office become null and void? Thank you for all of your work on this. May truth be known and the Lord’s Will be done.

    • Posted December 30, 2012 at 8:24 pm | Permalink | Reply

      As things stand right now, without a legal recognition that he never qualified and thus could never be the President, impeachment would have to precede a CRIMINAL trial for Obama – that’s just regarding the crimes he has committed, not whether he can be POTUS.

      Ultimately, to have a LEGAL RULING on whether Obama has ever lawfully been President, the step that has to be taken is for a Congressman – or somebody with obvious standing, such as Hobby Lobby – to challenge Obama’s Constitutional ability to either be or “act” as President, as per Article I and the 20th Amendment, respectively. If those procedures are undergone and it is found that Obama never qualified, then impeachment would be neither possible nor necessary, because Obama could be arrested on the spot, once SCOTUS rules that Obama could never be the President.

      At least that’s my understanding.

    • americanadvocate
      Posted December 30, 2012 at 9:09 pm | Permalink | Reply

      THE IMPOSTER CAN CERTAINLY BE INDICTED FOR TREASON AND FRAUD , PLUS LYING AND BAD GOVERNANCE .

  10. Posted December 30, 2012 at 7:35 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Obama is not impeachable. Please see Devvykidd.com or go into her archives at newswithviews.com. Thanks for all of this info.

    • Posted December 30, 2012 at 8:28 pm | Permalink | Reply

      To legally determine that he’s not impeachable, though, we have to go through the procedures to determine his eligibility this time. If he isn’t eligible this time, then he was never eligible, and at the point that is legally determined, impeachment would no longer be possible or necessary; an arrest would be in order. Without a legal determination that he is NOT eligible, the legal presumption is that he is. You and I both know otherwise, but what matters in this context is what is legally determined.

  11. Posted December 30, 2012 at 7:46 pm | Permalink | Reply

    butterdezillion – is your family proud of you now, based upon this unique analysis or do they still ostracize you?

    • Posted December 30, 2012 at 8:36 pm | Permalink | Reply

      I don’t really talk about this with my extended family so I don’t think they even know what I’ve been up to on this. The more I personally can be in the background, the better for everybody involved. But at the same time, the information needs to get out there and Congress members and law enforcement need to do what’s right, based on the legal information currently available. That’s why the whole huge body of America-lovers are so needed at this point. In many ways the very existence of this nation depends on whether the “little people” (hobbits) love the country enough to hope even when despair seems the only reasonable response, and each rise in time to make a wave that rises too high to be ignored any longer. This may well be our last stand; we need to take it while we have the chance.

  12. Jerry
    Posted December 30, 2012 at 8:46 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Breaking News!
    Request for video recording and broadcasting of January 3, 2013 hearing before Judge England was forwarded to the judge and court Please, come to the hearing on January 3rd, 2pm
    Chief District Judge to rule whether there will be a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining certification of Obama’s election by Congress pending adjudication on the merits of the issues of Obama’s use of forged IDs and fraudulently obtained CT SSN 042-68-4425, which Obama used on his tax returns, but which was never assigned to him according E-Verify and SSNVS
    Complaint also contains a sworn affidavit of an assistant clerk of the Registrar for the City of Hawaii and county of Hawaii, attesting to the fact that there is no birth certificate for barack obama from any hospital in Hawaii.

    Chief U.S. District judge for the Eastern District of California Morrison C. England to rule whether the U.S. Congress will be enjoined from certifying the Certificate of electoral Vote for Candidate for the U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) soetoro, aka Barack (Barry) Obama soebarkah, pursuant to a Temporary restraining order Motion filed by Attorney Orly Titz on behalf of several Presidential Candidates and Presidential candidates.

    TRO request was filed pursuant to sworn affidavits of Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona, Sheriff Arpaio, Investigator Mike Zullo, senior Deportation Officer with the department of Homeland Security John Sampson, Licensed investigator Susan Daniels, typesetting and Printing expert Paul Irey, Printing expert Douglas Vogt, Printing Expert Jonathan Poland, information Technology Expert Felicito Papa witness Linda Jordan and others attesting to the fact that Barack Obama’s short form birth certificate, long form birth certificate and Selective Service certificate represent computer generated forgeries and his social Security number is a fraudulently obtained Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was issued in and around March 28, 1977 to an elderly resident of Connecticut born in 1890, who is presumed to be deceased, whose death was not reported to the SSA and whose number was unlawfully assumed by Barack (Barry) Soetoro/Soebarkah/Obama in around 1980.

    Complaint also contains a sworn affidavit of an assistant clerk of the Registrar for the City of Hawaii and county of Hawaii, attesting to the fact that there is no birth certificate for Barack obama from any hospital in Hawaii.

    • Posted December 30, 2012 at 9:54 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Prayers up for both Orly and Judge Morrison England!

      I would think that other Presidential candidates would have standing to demand action. But then, a lot of things that should have been haven’t turned out that way. Like the whole rule of law…

  13. Posted December 31, 2012 at 1:21 am | Permalink | Reply

    Hi Butterdezillion,

    I think what you’re doing is very important. Are you the only blogger devoting this much attention to the issue?

    I put up a brief essay on my blog linking to your blog here — http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-eligibility-issue-nope-it-didnt-go.html

    • Posted December 31, 2012 at 3:10 pm | Permalink | Reply

      A lot of bloggers have devoted a lot of time to the issue. Most of what I’ve got was obtained with the help of others. I wish I could say who all they are but at this point I can’t – either by their request or because I just don’t have time right now. But everybody should know that we have a lot of extremely concerned, dedicated, intelligent, and diligent people who have been investigating a lot of different angles regarding this issue.

      Thanks for bringing attention to this on your blog. We need to get the truth out and get somebody in Congress to file a lawsuit with standing so Obama will have to present his BC and all the evidence related to its accuracy can be gathered and probative value determined, as well as his actual birth facts, so it can be found whether he is eligible.

  14. Posted December 31, 2012 at 7:20 am | Permalink | Reply

    Butterdezillion,

    The few skeptics here who quibble with you about the Onaka language could perhaps be additionally persuaded by the strong impression, based on direct experience, of Det. Mike Zullo, lead investigator for Sheriff Arpaio, as reported last month:

    An angry statement just sworn by the lead investigator of a team assigned to review Barack Obama’s birth certificate says Hawaii officials – who are Democrats like Obama – are using “elaborate non-cooperation” to conceal birth records from law enforcement and the public.

    Zullo, a seasoned sleuth who heads the team deputized by Joe Arpaio, recently re-elected sheriff of Maricopa County, Ariz., fingers Hawaii’s governor, deputy attorney general and health department chiefs as obstructing justice.

    Zullo’s affidavit charges these officials are “hiding” original birth records, thwarting the posse’s hunt for those who forged the document at the White House website.

    His detailed catalog of Hawaii’s misfeasance is shocking.

    The department, Zullo said, “has engaged in what the sheriff’s investigators believe is a systematic effort to hide from law enforcement and the public whatever original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may have in its possession.”

    Officials “changed their policies and procedures in a manner calculated to hinder our law-enforcement investigation,” he continued.

    Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2960492/posts

    • Posted December 31, 2012 at 3:16 pm | Permalink | Reply

      It was the lawlessness of the HDOH that convinced me I had to go public with what I’ve found out. That’s why I started this blog. I don’t think it’s an accident that about a month after I started the blog, Hawaii began their attempt to gut their open records law. The affidavit I filed (and for which I gave a link to the Congress members) provides evidence of violations of the law, manipulation/alteration of public records, and deceptions by the HDOH itself, as well as others.

      If government at every level can get away with this kind of crap we have no reason to trust them with anything or believe anything they say. Period. That’s one reason why we have to get to the bottom of this.

  15. Carmen Waggoner, Ph.D.
    Posted January 1, 2013 at 4:26 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Dabney: January 1st, 2013 at 11:05
    I am a psychologist, who shares your belief about Obama. His narcissistic personality disorder developped at a young age and reinforces his belief that he is the chosen one to save the world; he therefore cannot recognize his blatant contradictions or lies. Hitler had the same framework.

  16. Posted January 12, 2013 at 7:39 pm | Permalink | Reply

    Hello from Tucson, AZ – Sheriff Arpaio NEVER filed a complaint!!! “Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court” – February 15, 2013

    • Posted January 13, 2013 at 9:19 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Arpaio can’t file a complaint because he can’t yet prove who committed the forgeries, when, or where. However, he can testify that the birth certificate and draft registrations are indeed forgeries, and both he and his lead investigator, Mike Zullo, have signed affidavits saying the evidence shows that they were forged.

  17. Posted April 13, 2013 at 8:46 pm | Permalink | Reply

    We still have no fixed answer on this. History is suspended. No
    one in power will act until the SCOTUS gives a clear ruling on the
    case in 2013 or beyond. We are all nothing but hostages to the
    illegalities, forgeries, congeries, and calumnies of Obot and the
    trolls. Bad Luck for all good people. IMO.

    • Posted April 13, 2013 at 9:27 pm | Permalink | Reply

      Exactly. We’ve got North Korea screaming “nuclear war!” and we have no idea whose side our supposed-Commander-in-Chief is even on.

      Anybody who can’t see that as problematic is one of the walking dead.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 98 other followers

%d bloggers like this: