NEW: Remember that video of the Cessna crash after which HDOH Director Loretta Fuddy was reported as dead? You need to look closer. See my youtube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvn8iPE4l-8&feature=youtu.be and some supporting images at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/extras/ . There are also more images and questions at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2014/02/22/some-more-images/
There will be more images coming.
Please make this go viral. Millions of people saw the clips that ABC posted and, as ABC intended, ridiculed those of us who knew there was more to the story. Those same people need to see the anatomy of Alinsky in technicolor – how the truth is hidden by the Alinskiy operatives, and how those who know it are ridiculed and marginalized. And silenced.
The Putting-it-All-Together Series:
Part 1: HDOH Red Flags http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/hdoh-red-flags.pdf
Virginia Sunahara’s death certificate shows us not only that the HDOH is fabricating vital records, but that the subordinates ordered to do it are resisting by raising red flags in the forgeries they create. This is one of the central pieces to finishing this puzzle.
Part 2: Clue Number Two
Four August 1961 BC#’s were changed by the HDOH, based on the BC numbering system documented by CDC records. Obama was given the BC# that originally belonged to the 3rd Honolulu birth after Gretchen Nordyke – almost certainly Stig Waidelich.
Part 3: The Law Enforcement Provision
The alteration of 4 out of the 6 disclosed August 1961 BC#’s (including one deceased infant) makes it almost certain that the HDOH shifted BC#’s in order to give Obama a new BC# on a BC created at the request of law enforcement and claiming whatever law enforcement said it should say. There is a BC in Hawaii that has the BC# 10641 and whatever law enforcement ordered it to say, for Obama’s safety. There is also the record that Obama originally had, which has a different BC# and reveals something so drastically different that law enforcement claimed that real record would put Obama’s life at risk. Either that, or the HDOH falsified at least 4 August 1961 BC#’s without even trying to legally justify it.
Part 4: Three Bizarre Events
Three events are bizarre unless you realize what was going on:
1. Abercrombie claimed an investigation of Obama’s birth record found something actually written down in the State Archives.
2. Mike Evans claimed Abercrombie told him he had gone to the hospitals with a search warrant, and there is no birth certificate or other evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii.
3. When the story of Evans’ claims went viral Abercrombie and AG Louie forced HDOH Director Palafox to resign and lied about it while anonymously threatening to investigate him for medical billing fraud. Three days later Palafox forced them to tell the truth about firing him by saying he didn’t know why he resigned.
I believe Palafox was the snag in the plan to create a new BC for Obama based on law enforcement saying it was necessary to protect Obama from those “crazy Arizona birthers”. Palafox wouldn’t create a new BC for Obama because the only record they had for Obama was non-valid and couldn’t legally be presumed as true, and the law only allows a new BC to be created for someone who was born in Hawaii. So Gov. Abercrombie and AG Louie got rid of Palafox and replaced him with Loretta Fuddy who (as we will see) proceeded to execute the plan – including (among other things) the unlawful shuffling of 4 August 1961 BC#’s in order to land Obama with a BC that claimed a Kapiolani Hospital birth and had the BC# that had been used on the forgery to sanitize Obama’s passport file 3 years earlier: Stig Waidelich’s.
Part Five: Fuddy Illegally Executes the Plan
9-19-12 Secretaries of State, look at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2012/09/21/birth-index-list-does-not-indicate-legally-valid-record/ for proof that Obama’s name on the birth index list proves nothing about his birth certificate’s legal validity and thus doesn’t contradict Onaka’s confirmation to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that the record is non-valid. See http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf for a reminder of what you received via certified mail from Attorney Larry Klayman a couple weeks ago (the proof of receipt will be posted here soon). See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2012/09/21/kansas-never-asked-if-record-was-valid/ to see that the verification Kansas received is legally worthless. To understand the difference between the AZ verification and the legally-worthless verifications requested by both MDEC and KS SOS Kris Kobach, see http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/wheel-of-fortune-v-family-feud-final.pdf
9-13-12 The current BC#’s the HDOH claims for Barack Obama, Stig Waidelich, Johanna Ah Nee, and Virginia Sunahara could not have been on their original 1961 BC’s if either Okubo’s or Verna Lee’s numbering methods were used. If Lee’s was used, then the trail of BC#-swapping isn’t hard to follow at all… See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/the-hdoh-has-juggled-bcs-for-at-least-4-1961-bcs/
9-3-12 I’ve confirmed the legal reasoning with 3 different attorneys: Onaka confirmed that Obama’s HI BC is not legally valid: http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2012/09/02/onaka-confirms-obamas-bc-is-non-valid/
You will be hearing more about this.
5-30-12 AZ SOS Bennett did NOT withdraw his form request; the verification’s response was to not verify that birthdate (and other information) because those facts CANNOT be verified. This is indirect confirmation that Obama’s birth record is not legally valid. http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/verification-verifies-if-anything-that-obamas-record-is-legally-non-valid/
5-25-12 CRITICAL – WHAT THE HDOH “VERIFIED” FOR THE AZ SOS ACTUALLY STRONGLY SUPPORTS OBAMA’S BC BEING LATE AND AMENDED, AND THUS NOT LEGALLY VALID: http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2012/05/24/hawaiis-non-verification/
5-21-12 Important updates at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/important-updates/
NEW: HDOH Funny Business Regarding Virginia Sunahara This one is critical. The HDOH says they can’t find any birth record under Virginia Sunahara’s name even though she is listed in their 1960-64 birth index. Much more.
NEW: 1960-64 Birth Index Includes Legally Invalid Records . This one is also critical. The 1960-64 birth index includes the birth names of at least 2 adopted children. Those records are required to be sealed, and their inclusion in the public list indicates that the list has been manipulated by the HDOH. At this point we have no way of knowing whether any name listed in the birth index represents a legally-valid record.
NEW: HDOH Has Two Different Versions of 1960-64 Birth Index. The HDOH sent me copies of the exact same page from the 1960-64 Birth Index Book, 2 months apart. But one has the date range heading and the other doesn’t. Either there are 2 versions of the 1960-64 birth index, or they are altering pages from it at will.
NEW: If the COLB Seal Is Nickel-Sized… The seal on Obama’s COLB is a significantly different size than the seal on Obama’s long-form. Companion to “Obama BC Seal Contradicts Factcheck”
New: Did Factcheck Help Forge the COLB? Just like some of the items on the long-form forgery, the seal on the Factcheck COLB doesn’t distort properly for the bend of the paper it’s on. That seal could not have been on the COLB when Factcheck photographed it.
NEW: “Obama BC Seal Contradicts Factcheck” I was wrong. A photo by Savanna Guthrie shows there WAS a very light, indistinct seal on the long-form BC. Unfortunately for Obama, it can’t be the same seal as was on the Factcheck COLB.
NEW: “White Copy” Not Directly From Certified Birth Certificate The copy distributed to the press was taken from a print-out, not from the certified BC. This specifically enabled manipulation.
NEW: Long-Form Forgery for Dummies How we know the long-form Obama presented is a forgery – NO COMPUTER KNOWLEDGE NECESSARY TO UNDERSTAND =) Updated by “Obama BC Seal Contradicts Factcheck” and further clarified by If the COLB Seal Is Nickel-Sized…
New News: Please see important new post about the Birth Announcements – Attention Bill O’Reilly: The Rest of the Story . Or click here to just see the article. This article will be updated as soon as I can tie loose ends. The Star-Bulletin portion is current and accurate. The Advertiser portion needs to be revised because I have been able to access information I didn’t have before and it changes the focus of where the problem comes from. Starfelt never posted the full-page Advertiser image so that image wasn’t claimed to be from the HSL. It WAS claimed to be from the Advertiser office, which reveals a different problem and possibly points to the source of the deceptions. I will update ASAP.
Also – everybody needs to look here to see that Judge Surick received his “decision” against Berg as a fax from somebody else. The date/time stamp from the original fax remained on every page when Surick forwarded it to Berg as if it was his own. What federal judge would let somebody else make his decision for him, unless he had been threatened? Put a hold on this one for now; I’m still checking this one out. Not sure how the automatic stamps work when a fax is forwarded.
Welcome to my blog. There’s a lot of information here. This post is to give you an overview of the major subject matter here. If you’re already familiar with my content and just want to keep up with the latest posts you can look in the archive (on sidebar at the left) for this month. If you want to follow the posts and comments you can subscribe to the RSS feed. I’m working on categorizing and tagging posts so you can find information more easily, but for now the search feature can help with that. To search this entire site click here and add/type into the very front of the search entry the term you want to search for. (Leave the rest of the search as is. Then hit Enter or click “Search”)
Click here for links to reference materials (laws, opinions, etc)
Why I Care About This Issue
I care about this issue - and I’m choosing my words carefully and precisely here, based on what I can document – because it has shown me that we have a runaway, lawless system of government bureaucracy, media, law enforcement, courts, and Congress, and if we don’t reclaim the rule of law by giving the people real power to insure that the law is enforced at all levels, the future of every child in this nation (including my own) will be destroyed. This has nothing to do with racism and nothing to do with politics. It has everything to do with accountability. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and that’s pretty much where America is at right now, because we have no way to hold our elected officials accountable to the law BETWEEN ELECTIONS.
How I reached that conclusion is here
It is imperative that we pass state laws which require measures to insure that the Constitution is followed and the people are able to hold government accountable. A sample bill is here. The rationale for the measures in the bill is here. An explanation for why this issue should be a priority right now is here . A booklet giving an overview of the eligibility issue is here.
Overview of Birth Certificate Problem
Summary: The Hawaii DOH has indirectly confirmed that Obama’s birth certificate was amended in 2006 and is therefore not legally valid. Obama could not have “qualified” by Jan 20, 2009 as required by the 20th Amendment since his birth date, birthplace, and parentage have not been legally determined (unless he has a BC from somewhere else). The HDOH has also confirmed in 2 different ways that the Factcheck COLB is a forgery. HI Governor and friend to Obama, Neil Abercrombie, concurred, telling Mike Evans that there is no birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii. Former HI elections worker, Tim Adams, has also signed an affidavit saying he was told by his superiors that it was common knowledge that Obama has no birth certificate in Hawaii. No Hawaii official has ever claimed that Hawaii has a LEGALLY VALID birth certificate for Obama; the HDOH has said they can’t reveal the legal status of a birth certificate nor reveal anything about a birth certificate, including anything from a BC that would expose a forgery.
Amendment Confirmation for Dummies =)
- Why any of this matters:
- How the lawlessness matches the pattern of Obama’s first 6 months in office, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3
- Why it doesn’t matter that Obama was already installed
- What we know about Obama’s legal problems
- Transcripts and links to Mike Evans’ audio statements #1 and #2. Abercrombie’s statements to Star Advertiser reporter.
Evidence from HDOH that Factcheck COLB is forged:
Factcheck Forgery For Dummies =)
- Incompatible Certificate Number cert# given by registrar on “date filed“, COLB and long-form #’s the same, corroboration
- BC amendment confirmed but not noted on COLB Index post, all records denied, complete HDOH response, Joesting won’t correct Terri K, clearer Joesting appeal response, Joesting counsel
- Details on amendment 2006, denial of access to supporting evidence, fee records denied, no legal name change order
The Birth Announcement mess
Summary: Two different people claimed to acquire the Advertiser birth announcement copy independently – one from the Hawaii State Library and the other from the Advertiser office – but they are actually the same image and NOT from the Hawaii State Library. Three different people claimed to acquire the Star-Bulletin copy independently – again, one from the Advertiser office and the other 2 from the Hawaii State Library. But they are all identical scans and NOT from the Hawaii State Library. We were told a lie about where those images came from.
We were also told that the announcements had to come from the Vital Records Office because the lists are identical, but in reality the lists only APPEAR identical because the Star-Bulletin image was truncated to leave off the extra 26 announcements it had that were not included in the Advertiser’s list. The more concise report is here. A few more details included here. More info will be coming.
Democratic Party certification mess
Summary: Neither the Democratic National Committee (DNC) nor the Hawaii Democratic Party (HDP) has asked to see Obama’s vital records or receive a letter of verification for Obama’s birth facts. The Hawaii Democratic Party was so eager to get rid of the “Constitutionally-eligible” language in their standard Certification of Nomination that they took out a whole line of text including the only thing they were required by HI law to include. Because the HDP refused to certify Obama’s Constitutional eligibility, the DNC was forced to certify that to get Obama’s name on the Hawaii ballot, but did so without even asking to see any documentation and knowing that the HDP had refused to certify eligibility. The lawyer who had represented the HDP in past lawsuits was the divorce lawyer for Obama’s mother and may well have seen a birth certificate from someplace besides Hawaii.
- Index post:
- Supporting documents: No letter of verification, No DNC or HDP Requests
- Certs: 2004 HDP, 2004 DNC, 2000 HDP, 2000 DNC, 2008 Letter of Transmittal
- Notes from call to Deputy AG Schulaner
The Passport Office mess
Summary: In response to Chris Strunk’s FOIA request and lawsuit for passport records for Obama’s mother, the Passport Office disclosed passport records from 1967 and later, but submitted an affidavit and alleged Department of State “cable” claiming that the retention period for records had been changed in the early 1980’s and millions of passport applications had been destroyed, thus explaining why they can’t find Ann’s earlier records. But there are none of the required records of the disposition changing, no required records of disposal, the records we have strongly suggest that the “cable” is a fabrication, and records that should have been destroyed according to the criteria mentioned in the cable have been disclosed for someone else. It very strongly looks as if the Passport Office and their lawyer have committed fraud and/or perjury in order to hide Obama’s mother’s records. In addition, index cards showing all passports issued to her -which are required to be microfilmed in alphabetical order and are permanent public records – have been requested well over a year and a half ago and the DOS has not disclosed them.
- Index post. Update.
- Supporting documents: Galovich cable, GAO discrepancies , PRISM passport microfilming, PIERS electronic indexing of passport records, Jacobsen passport photo, Strunk response 1, Jacobsen’s Stunk Response 1, Jacobsen sur-reply affidavit, DOS first reply
1961 Birth Index mess
Summary: In 1981 when the vital records were being converted to electronic, it was decided that the handwritten paper index of births was to be retained permanently. When asked for the copy of the handwritten 1961 birth index the HDOH responded that there is no handwritten index but the requestor could get a computer printout of 1961 births for $98.75. The requestor sent in a request with a money order for $98.75; the same day as the money was in the HDOH office HDOH spokesperson, Janice Okubo, gave an interview saying the HDOH could disclose the 1961 birth index for $98.75 but nobody had sent in the money. The HDOH then sent the money order back, claimed they had never received a request for the computer-generated index at all, and now says they CANNOT print out a 1961 birth index.
The birth index is of particular interest because in March of 2010 Obama’s name was not in the 1960-64 birth index book at the HDOH office but by June 2010 the HDOH presented a birth index book they claimed was the 1960-64 index which had Obama’s name in it. The name above Obama’s is “Obado, Duplicate Mae”. If there was a duplicate record for Mae Obado the other record for her should have been right where Obama’s name is now posted. If Abercrombie is correct and there is no birth certificate for Obama at the HDOH, the birth index in March was correct, the birth index in June was manipulated to insert Obama’s name falsely, and the HDOH was most probably refusing to show the genuine computer printout because they knew it would not have Obama’s name in it.
This is a convoluted episode showing the sandbagging and gaslighting done by the HDOH in order to cover potentially criminal action on their part in order to cover up Obama’s ineligibility. Sadly, it is just one of many examples of lawlessness and/or corruption in Hawaii’s government.
- Index post:
- Supporting documents: no handwritten index, no AG communications, claims never got my request, cease and desist letter, evasion, request to see my request, returned my money order, HDOH admits they got my request, request for UIPA responses, AP reporter communications, Niesse Facebook message, Niesse UIPA response, HDOH request to re-send, delivery confirmation, my request, Notice to Requestor
Government Corruption in Hawaii:
Investigation of illegally-destroyed records: Nothing to see here.
Refusal to investigate crimes, report crimes to law enforcement, or correct HDOH’s inaccurate justifications
- Hiding of the Administrative Rules
- Unlawful rule changes #1 and #2
- Destruction of permanent records
- Index post
Supporting posts: archivist says HDOH should have records, index of foreign births destroyed, HDOH Retention Schedule
- Failure to retain records the required period
- Obfuscation on birth certificates Dr Conspiracy on BC’s , Hawaii BC requirements, standard BC, late BC and foreign birth Alteration of communication history, e-mail history , HDOH deleted e-mail
- Refusals to make required disclosures: Certificate numbers, July 27 announcement substantiation, non-certified abbreviated BC
- Failure to keep required documentation: #1, #2, #3
- Refusal to clarify (obfuscation)
- Denial of requirement to report forgery
- Suspicious timing of OIP Director Tsukiyama’s resignation and promotion from Fukino’s corp: resignation, promotion, Takase explanation
- Refusing statutory duty to hold agencies accountable
- Failure to investigate
- The Vexatious Requestor Mess: the bill, testimony, late testimony
The Media Mess
Summary: There is evidence that in October of 2008 the major TV and radio companies were threatened by Obama’s representatives if they reported on the eligibility issue – evidence including a signed statement by a media personality who was threatened, handwritten notes by a secretary at one of the meetings, corroborating information and statements about the meetings, etc. Since that time both the conservative and liberal media have been either refusing to report on the subject at all, or reporting inaccuracies and refusing to correct errors when made aware of the inaccuracies. Most often they just don’t acknowledge receiving the correct information.